No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Aruba Access Points vs Cisco Meraki MR Wireless comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
4.6
Aruba Access Points offer quick ROI, ease of management, cost savings, and efficiency, enhancing communication without needing extensive support.
Sentiment score
3.9
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless reduces manpower needs and costs while enhancing network availability and security, offering significant ROI.
This is why we do not require technical support, as the solution remains simple without AI implementation.
Manager Technical at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
It is acceptable; it was not very cheap, but it was acceptable, and we can tell our customers, 'This is a good solution and you should pay this once and you have this solution forever.'
Telecommunication Engineer at Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia
This singular point is important because one wants something that is not just cost-effective but also something that can be supported and troubleshot with skilled people familiar with the technology.
Senior Product Manager at Packet Clouds
Giving me a view of unauthorized users attempting to access the environment, which I can easily track from the Meraki dashboard, allowing me to reject such traffic as and when needed.
Solution Engineer & Manager at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
If it is not cloud managed, there's a 30 to 40% reduction in manpower.
Manager of Solutions and Support at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Aruba Access Points' customer service receives mixed reviews, with varying response times and satisfaction levels among users.
Sentiment score
6.4
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless support varies in effectiveness, with mixed ratings, valued replacements, and helpful account managers.
A company called ACT is very good at support.
Senior Manager, Hospitality Program at ACT international
For technical support alone, I would give them a score of nine out of ten.
Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation
I need them to provide faster response and resolution time.
Technical wireless Team Lead at SEE "Systems Engineering of Egypt"
Cisco's technical support is the best.
Technical wireless Team Lead at SEE "Systems Engineering of Egypt"
Raising a tech call can be a convoluted mechanism, which impacts my rating.
Enterprise Architect at Fujitsu
Among our tickets, 50% receive proper support and guidance, while the remaining 50% do not receive adequate attention.
Technical Solution Architect at liwa
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Aruba Access Points excel in scalability and adaptability, efficiently supporting varied network setups for growing and extensive deployments.
Sentiment score
5.3
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless scales easily with a centralized dashboard but lacks policy-based routing and advanced feature support.
Aruba access points integrate well with existing networks via PoE switches.
Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation
Scalability and expandability are adjusted from day one based on expansion and growth projections.
Manager Technical at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Every decision the central management makes takes extra latency to send over to the local area network.
Telecommunication Engineer at Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is easier to deploy or manage multiple access points via the same Meraki dashboard cloud.
Solution Engineer & Manager at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I have seen a customer scale from three branch offices to approximately ninety-seven, and it scaled without issues.
Senior Product Manager at Packet Clouds
Policy-based routing is not available in Cisco Meraki MR Wireless, but it is available in Nexus and other products.
Manager of Solutions and Support at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Aruba Access Points are highly reliable, with strong stability; occasional firmware or power issues may arise after extended use.
Sentiment score
7.4
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is praised for its exceptional reliability and stability, despite concerns about vendor lock-in.
The failure rate is very rare.
Manager Technical at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The only thing the customers need is that wireless communications work stably.
Telecommunication Engineer at Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia
Aruba Access Points are stable.
Technical wireless Team Lead at SEE "Systems Engineering of Egypt"
I have not seen any glitches, bugs, or stability problems with Cisco Meraki MR Wireless.
IT Specialist at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is a 99% stable and reliable solution.
Manager of Solutions and Support at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Once Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is installed, it is very reliable and lasts for a long time.
Sales Director at Integrated Tech9labs Pvt. Ltd.
 

Room For Improvement

Aruba Access Points require enhanced coverage, improved integration, cost-effective pricing, refined support, and reliable performance in high-density areas.
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless struggles with pricing, limited features, configuration issues, needing improvements in AI, integrations, and support.
Everyone discusses AI, but for providing wireless access to users, AI only plays its part when analytics are needed.
Manager Technical at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
There are some problems in assessing the performance of Aruba Access Points in environments with high user density.
Telecommunication Engineer at Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia
Performance is an area that could be improved and represents a gap for enhancement.
Wireless Network Engineer
In my opinion, what should be improved in Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is that the AP should initially get configured irrespective of the internet connectivity.
Technical Presales at Vcom Technologies
My main concern is that Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is overpriced, has limited functionality, and the hardware is not prepared for any further improvements in terms of features.
Enterprise Architect at Fujitsu
Cost is also an area for improvement, as feedback from some customers indicates that for the same amount of value received from alternative solutions, Cisco Meraki MR Wireless could be priced better.
Senior Product Manager at Packet Clouds
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers view Aruba Access Points as cost-effective, offering good value despite recurring and rising licensing fees.
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless offers straightforward pricing with potential discounts for known customers, balancing high retail costs with quality.
The pricing is reasonable and lower than competitors.
Senior Manager, Hospitality Program at ACT international
They are priced at half the rate of Juniper access points for basic models.
Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation
I would rate the price for the product as two, with one being high and ten being low.
Wireless Network Engineer
The cost of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is high; the price of one AP to the end customer is approximately 50,000 INR.
Technical Presales at Vcom Technologies
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very straightforward with no complex licensing requirements; just one single subscription based license on the APs is what is outstanding, making pricing and licensing pretty easy.
Solution Engineer & Manager at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would rate pricing an eight, as the retail prices are rather high, but if we go as a known customer to Meraki, there are some nice discounts.
IT Specialist at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

Aruba Access Points offer stability, security, and cost-effectiveness with seamless roaming, advanced features, and a simple pricing model.
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless offers cloud management, advanced security, easy deployment, and enhanced performance with frequent updates and multi-site visibility.
It is relatively easy to deploy Aruba Access Points, so from the box to operation is straightforward. In a few minutes, it is up and running.
Wireless Network Engineer
Aruba Access Points offer strong security with ClearPass, along with strong RF propagation, stability, security, and good coverage.
Technical wireless Team Lead at SEE "Systems Engineering of Egypt"
We receive support from Aruba, with assistance from the country manager in providing better quotations and support for projects.
Senior Manager, Hospitality Program at ACT international
Regarding security features Air Marshal and WIPS, they help with protecting my network, as we use enterprise protocols, so it meets our standards.
IT Specialist at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Easy deployment and configuration is the biggest feature that I really appreciate about the solution, plus it allows me to implement basic access-based controls, which gives me the feasibility of having secured connectivity.
Solution Engineer & Manager at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Everything can be done remotely, including deployment, provisioning, and troubleshooting from the cloud.
Senior Product Manager at Packet Clouds
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Access Points
Ranking in Wireless LAN
11th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless
Ranking in Wireless LAN
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Access Points is 2.7%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is 1.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless1.7%
Aruba Access Points2.7%
Other95.6%
Wireless LAN
 

Featured Reviews

HJ
Telecommunication Engineer at Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia
Wireless connectivity has remained reliable and supports flexible, cloud‑independent management
As I already mentioned, the ability to stay with self-hosting solutions for central management is what I think could be improved about Aruba Access Points. If this becomes available in the future, I think it should change the game. However, I don't currently see this because I see nothing about AirWave anymore on your roadmap. I don't understand what happens next. There are some problems in assessing the performance of Aruba Access Points in environments with high user density. If there is a dense environment, a mobility controller would be the one you should go with because this needs more telemetry to calculate. I suspect this will be easier to do with local administration or local management because if everything goes over the internet through Aruba Central, it takes time. Every decision the central management makes takes extra latency to send over to the local area network. I think this is not a good approach to move to central management that is hosted somewhere far away. It should still retain the functionality to use Instant AP functionality that is available until 500 and maybe 600 as well. If you go to software version 10 and future versions, then you lose this functionality and you can't go back anymore. It would be good to assist with local location management and BLE-based functionalities as additional features I expect from future Aruba Access Points. There were some attempts to support third-party integrations through cooperation between Aruba and Meridian. However, I don't understand what happened there, and nothing is clear in this area. IoT will also be very important for people. You should add functionality to the platform that will support third-party IoT devices.
Michel Ned - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Product Manager at Packet Clouds
Cloud-managed wireless has unified multi-floor offices and has improved application visibility
The central provisioning capability is a major strength, combined with the cloud-based nature of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless. Everything can be done remotely, including deployment, provisioning, and troubleshooting from the cloud. The hardware requirement on-premises is significantly reduced, with only access points needed on-site while the controller sits in the cloud. This represents the major selling point. Many enterprise environments now require application steering and the ability to control traffic through their WAN or SD-WAN, ensuring they can tag applications and enforce policies from a Layer 7 perspective. From the wireless perspective, being able to begin that Layer 7 tracking or Layer 7 enforcement all the way down to the core and to the WAN is valuable. The ability to see through packets at Layer 7 is a good advantage for enterprises that are very security-focused and optimization-focused, making application steering a very important feature. Cloud provisioning is beneficial not only for initial setup but also for troubleshooting and issue resolution. The advantage is that one does not have to deal with the issues of on-premises accessibility, and network issues can be isolated from the cloud. Since Cisco Meraki MR Wireless controller itself is in the cloud, it makes operations easier. The visibility on-premises combined with the ability to control and troubleshoot multiple locations and branch offices from a single pane of glass is very useful. Visibility into the type of traffic passing through at a given point in time is important. If that information can be passed through a SIEM or integrated with a security operations center or incident and event management tool within Cisco Meraki MR Wireless, it provides deeper visibility. The fact that Cisco Meraki MR Wireless can log traffic data for analysis is a very good and frequently used feature.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Access Points?
I would rate the price for the product as two, with one being high and ten being low.
What needs improvement with Aruba Access Points?
AI is only in Aruba Central, and we don't use Aruba Central yet. Integrating AI in the controller would be a good point for improvement. Performance is an area that could be improved and represents...
What advice do you have for others considering Aruba Access Points?
Aruba Access Points work fine with another product called ClearPass. I integrated it with the Access Point. Overall, I would give a final rating of eight for Aruba Access Points. I would recommend ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?
Regarding the pricing aspect, I think the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless are very reasonable and good.
What needs improvement with Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?
Regarding improvements or enhancements in Cisco Meraki MR Wireless, I believe Cisco should take the step of offering multi-vendor support. I have worked with solutions where the same access point c...
What is your primary use case for Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is mainly used in commercial or business environments and is very suitable for marketing or announcing. Easy deployment is one of its key advantages, requiring only the ins...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Access Points vs. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.