Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

Riverbed and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 90% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Read 10 Aternity AppInternals [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

Splunk AppDynamics

Read 259 Splunk AppDynamics reviews

13,654 Views
10,377 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Splunk AppDynamics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

Aternity AppInternals [EOL] and Splunk AppDynamics compete in the application performance management space. Splunk AppDynamics holds the upper hand with its advanced features and integration capabilities, providing comprehensive solutions.

Features: Aternity AppInternals [EOL] provides in-depth transaction monitoring, server analysis, and root cause analysis. Splunk AppDynamics offers application performance diagnostics, business transaction analytics, and seamless integration with existing Splunk infrastructures.

Room for Improvement: Aternity AppInternals [EOL] could enhance its feature set and expand integration capabilities. It could also focus on broadening analytics scope and improving interface intuitiveness. Splunk AppDynamics may benefit from streamlining deployment complexity, refining its user interface for ease of use, and enhancing its support for dynamic environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aternity AppInternals [EOL] excels in streamlined deployment and robust support. Splunk AppDynamics offers cloud-based deployment options, enhancing flexibility and scalability, alongside commendable customer service for integration management.

Pricing and ROI: Aternity AppInternals [EOL] is cost-effective with reasonable ROI, offering value without significant financial burden. Splunk AppDynamics, while having a higher initial cost, promises justified ROI through its extensive feature capabilities by meeting complex system demands proficiently.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk AppDynamics

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

259

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (3rd)

Featured Reviews

PAUL JOSEPHS

Security & Performance Analytics Technical Specialist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Points out the relevant problems in the enterprise and it's easy to understand

The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it…

Read full review

DevendraKumar1

Technology lead at Infosys

Has enabled us to detect issues instantly through alerts and monitor every service from a single dashboard

Splunk requires significantly more improvements compared to Splunk AppDynamics, specifically regarding the licensing aspect. Splunk renews licenses every six months, which is inconvenient. It would be better to have a one-year license to avoid needing to update keys constantly, which can only occur on weekends, making it a burdensome task. Although Splunk is better for certain use cases, Splunk AppDynamics is broader in functionality. Specifically, I want enhancements related to creating dashboards not only for logs or minor services but also for configuration levels, allowing us to check configurations immediately without manually opening the entire code when exceptions arise—a feature I wish to see improved in Splunk, although it may not be necessary for Splunk AppDynamics.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is very useful to find problems in middleware for the application servers, especially agent instrumentation and management is user friendly."

"Browsermetrix, which is real-user monitoring via JS injection and linked back to TTW via cookie. It allows us to see the experience of every user hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc."

"The capability of analysing each individual transaction captured to a very low level detail (method call/line of code)."

"We just control on the backend of AppInternals what we want to instrument and what we don't want to instrument."

"As an Administrator, before we bought this AppInternals, I didn't have visibility on why items were slow or why an application was not running. This gives us the ability to see what's going on. The application is load balancing. We can now see if its own server has issues or just one specific server has issues."

"I like it that one can match IPs with the application name."

"Clicks to root cause - fast & easy to diagnose and deep-dive"

"Synthetic transactions, WMI and SNMP query capability."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] pros

"The auto-discovery of the logs is the most valuable feature. It requires minimal configuration, we just need to set up on once and it automatically detects through the code."

"Error analysis in the troubleshooting sections go straight to the point."

"Users can configure business sections in their environment, and it's possible for customers to configure different sources for the name of the class, the name of the method, or the name of the web service, which is very interesting."

"Visibility to the end-users is a valuable feature."

"The solution offers great visibility that allows you to track where errors originated."

"The features that I like best are the dashboard and Business Journey."

"The business transaction that stands between multiple applications is proving to be most valuable."

"Applications: This provides us insight into how our applications are performing within our environments and affords us the ability to identify opportunities and make changes to code / environment to effect positive performance lift."

More Splunk AppDynamics pros

Cons

"The admin dashboard could be easier as it takes a little bit of time to get used to it."

"The technical support is not very good and should be improved."

"We'd like to be able to find out performance problems on application class and methods."

"The recording mechanism for synthetic transactions could be improved as well."

"Support for PHP, DB and other applications need to be supported."

"It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."

"We have put in a request as an enhancement that we would like to search for items. If we're searching for a URL and we want to know was it a get or was it a post."

"I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it is now."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] cons

"An improvement could be if the monitoring was able to be summarized into something more clear and simple for people who don't have the technical skills on the database side."

"In the current version of AppDynamics, there is a correlated section, where we can see all servers’ performance along with application performance, but network performance is missing."

"I would like the solution to be more customizable to meet our client's requirements."

"The solution could improve by covering more technologies. For example, it does support .NET Core applications. However, it could be a bit better."

"The integration part in AppDynamics with other systems is an area with a little difficulty, especially when it comes to the configuration area. The integration of AppDynamics with other products takes a lot of time."

"The cost element is an issue. I can't expect the company to change its way of work. However, given the fact that we earn and do all our business in South African Rand, I would prefer to buy in Rand as opposed to the American dollar or British pound."

"The only improvement I see is intercepting calls in a mobile application without injecting additional code. Currently, when instrumenting or monitoring a mobile application, it's necessary to release updates, prompt users to upgrade, and inject code into the backend. It would be beneficial if there were a method to intercept these calls without requiring users to download and upgrade the application. However, I'm unsure about the feasibility of such an approach."

"One aspect that requires improvement is the agent. Without an agent, gathering sufficient information on applications is challenging. Additionally, the agent sometimes creates performance issues in production environments."

More Splunk AppDynamics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."

"There is no standard license instead, the license is adapted to the organization's requirements."

"AppDynamics is really pricey as it requires licenses for every feature."

"Our purchasing experience through the AWS Marketplace has been pretty painless."

"AppDynamics is priced on the higher side."

"The tool is expensive."

"The way it is structured in terms of price could be better. You pay for individual modules and that adds on to the cost, which detracts you from implementing those modules and slows you down."

"The cost is prohibitive."

"It is expensive. However, our time to recover has been reduced, and this product has helped recuperate costs and provided us with ROI."

More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	55
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	194

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What do you like most about AppDynamics?

The solution saves time and cost.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppDynamics?

I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten. The solution is highly expensive. Our company pays for the solution on a yearly basis, if we don't add new modules or features to the license, we need ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Correlsense SharePath vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Dynatrace vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Datadog vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

IDERA Precise vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Competitors

Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 11% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 3% of the time

More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Download Aternity AppInternals [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk AppDynamics

January 2026

Download Splunk AppDynamics product report

Also Known As

SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert

No data available

Overview

Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

Riverbed

Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.

AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.

What are the key features of AppDynamics?

Real-time Performance Monitoring: Offers immediate insights into application behavior.
Business Transaction Tracking: Tracks transactions from start to finish for bottleneck identification.
JVM Memory Monitoring: Provides detailed JVM metrics and memory use information.
Deep-dive Diagnostics: Enables in-depth analysis of code and stack traces.
Adaptable Dashboards: Customizable views for better data interpretation.

How does AppDynamics benefit users?

Improved Incident Resolution: Faster problem detection and solution implementation.
Enhanced Application Performance: Real-time monitoring optimizes system operations.
Comprehensive Visibility: Provides a full view of application infrastructure.
Informed Decision Making: Detailed analytics guide performance improvements.
Customer Satisfaction: Enhances user experience through faster issue resolutions.

In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.

Splunk

Sample Customers

National Instruments, Allianz

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.