Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs IDERA Precise comparison

Riverbed and IDERA are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 90% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Read 10 Aternity AppInternals [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

IDERA Precise

Read 2 IDERA Precise reviews

1,450 Views
1,276 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

IDERA Precise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aternity AppInternals [EOL] and IDERA Precise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IDERA Precise

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (61st)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1374792

IT Support Specialist at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for visibility but lacks many features and difficult to update

We're customers. We don't have a special relationship with the company. I am the operation's application administrator. At the moment, the solution is monitoring the applications that we want it to monitor. We're not looking at it on a daily basis. We just use it here and there. The challenge we have is that we believe that Dynatrace can address some tasks we'd like done that are not possible to execute on this solution. Dynatrace includes monitoring of not just the logs, but the applications as well. Dynatrace also makes us include firewalls, etc. We could have it so there are end to end solutions or identifications within the process. What we have right now is only the app server as well as the database server and its connectivity. The solution does save time that's caused when creating SQL coding. However, there are some issues around AppInternals changing the code and giving us issues. From the point of view of the top management, we want a more permanent solution. We want to identify what causes issues and we are looking for a more end-to-end solution. That is why we are looking at Dynatrace. I don't know if I have any advice for other organizations. The experience I have is only based on my own limited experience. However, I believe that the application has the potential to be really good if it identifies what is really important to an organization. It's still sort of half-baked without AppResponse. Without the other key features in infrastructure, like the network, firewalls, and proxies, it's lacking. It's not fully complete. I'd rate the solution six out of ten. It addresses some of our needs, but there's a lot lacking that could be added to make it a fuller, more interesting product.

Read full review

it_user3024

Senior Manager of Operations at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Simple to use but incredibly powerful

Great for rapid root cause, data is presented back in a way that is easy for non technical stakeholders to absorb (DBAs, Cap Analysts, testers, developers, application support), easy deployment on Oracle and SQL systems. Trending all SQL statements over time is invaluable to understand step changes. i.e is this slow because it is processing more or because an explain plan has changed.Dashboards and reports are very powerful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is very useful to find problems in middleware for the application servers, especially agent instrumentation and management is user friendly."

"By going to v10 it made our lives a whole lot easier because prior to v10, we had to put all of these assets, these Riverbed arguments, basically JVM start up itself."

"Browsermetrix, which is real-user monitoring via JS injection and linked back to TTW via cookie. It allows us to see the experience of every user hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc."

"Transaction Tracing is the most useful; being able to have the transaction stitched together so we can see where the problem is has proven invaluable."

"As an Administrator, before we bought this AppInternals, I didn't have visibility on why items were slow or why an application was not running. This gives us the ability to see what's going on. The application is load balancing. We can now see if its own server has issues or just one specific server has issues."

"Many times what might have taken hours or days can be resolved in a few minutes."

"As an Administrator, before we bought this AppInternals, I didn't have visibility on why items were slow or why an application was not running, and this gives us the ability to see what's going on."

"Clicks to root cause - fast & easy to diagnose and deep-dive"

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] pros

"Great for rapid root cause, data is presented back in a way that is easy for non technical stakeholders to absorb (DBAs, Cap Analysts, testers, developers, application support), easy deployment on Oracle and SQL systems."

"Gives an excellent perspective on the state of the system at fault as well as the past!"

Cons

"It's not as good as it was three years ago before meddling by an activist investor, privatization, and subsequent layoffs hurt support."

"Deployment and agent patch management is not managed centrally, resulting in a large level of effort to update."

"The technical support is not very good and should be improved."

"It wasn't a critical issue, but it was hot enough to where it would have been nice to get some guidance from Riverbed, but they went ahead and let us down, but that was only one occasion."

"They should find a way for report generation from TTW to run quicker."

"There are some functional bugs when using TTW and making report queries (to generate graphs)."

"We had issues with the end-to-end view of unique customer: reviewing end-to-end customer problems to see where a problem is about customer, code, DB or network."

"We'd like to be able to find out performance problems on application class and methods."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] cons

"Web monitoring could be more robust and intuitive."

"The user interface requires little change-but this problem is small compared to the capabilities of the tool"

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Dynatrace vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Correlsense SharePath vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Datadog vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Competitors

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs IDERA Precise

Compared 11% of the time

Dynatrace vs IDERA Precise

Compared 8% of the time

Automai AppLoader vs IDERA Precise

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service vs IDERA Precise

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs IDERA Precise

Compared 5% of the time

More IDERA Precise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Download Aternity AppInternals [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Download IDERA Precise product report

Also Known As

SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert

Precise Application Performance Platform, Precise APM, Precise for SAP, Precise for Peoplesoft

Overview

Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

Riverbed

IDERA Precise provides advanced monitoring solutions for institutions seeking to optimize database performance and maximize resource utilization effectively.

Designed to facilitate decision-making, IDERA Precise targets performance tuning challenges with precision, aiding IT teams in maintaining optimal server functionality. The software's comprehensive monitoring approach ensures critical applications operate smoothly, minimizing downtime and enhancing data flow efficiency.

What are the key features of IDERA Precise?

Database Monitoring: Continuously monitors database activity for improved performance.
Real-Time Analytics: Offers up-to-the-minute analytics to facilitate quick decision-making.
Performance Tuning: Customizes performance threads to maximize system efficacy.
Resource Management: Allocates resources efficiently to avoid server strain.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Reduced Downtime: Decreases server downtime, enhancing productivity.
Improved Efficiency: Streamlines database operations, resulting in less resource wastage.
Cost Savings: Lowers operational costs by optimizing resource use and reducing unnecessary expenditures.
Enhanced Decision Making: Provides critical insights, aiding faster response to performance issues.

IDERA Precise is crucial in sectors where data integrity and availability are paramount, such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce. By adopting IDERA Precise, organizations can ensure their databases support their operational demands effectively, optimizing workloads in highly data-dependent environments.

IDERA

Sample Customers

National Instruments, Allianz

Banco Bradesco; Bank of America; Carrefour; Energy Future Holdings; Fedex; Marriott International; Nestle; Reed Elsevier Group; Bank Leumi; Beijing Giftedstuffs Information Company, Ltd.; Daiwa Capital Markets, London; Magnitogorsky Iron Plant; Europa Sports; Mobistar Enterprise Services NV/SA; Air France; Casino IT; SoftBCom, Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.