Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management comparison

Riverbed and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 90% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Read 10 Aternity AppInternals [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Read 162 Broadcom DX Application Performance Management reviews

7,595 Views
6,684 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aternity AppInternals [EOL] and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

162

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (29th), Container Monitoring (7th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1374792

IT Support Specialist at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for visibility but lacks many features and difficult to update

We're customers. We don't have a special relationship with the company. I am the operation's application administrator. At the moment, the solution is monitoring the applications that we want it to monitor. We're not looking at it on a daily basis. We just use it here and there. The challenge we have is that we believe that Dynatrace can address some tasks we'd like done that are not possible to execute on this solution. Dynatrace includes monitoring of not just the logs, but the applications as well. Dynatrace also makes us include firewalls, etc. We could have it so there are end to end solutions or identifications within the process. What we have right now is only the app server as well as the database server and its connectivity. The solution does save time that's caused when creating SQL coding. However, there are some issues around AppInternals changing the code and giving us issues. From the point of view of the top management, we want a more permanent solution. We want to identify what causes issues and we are looking for a more end-to-end solution. That is why we are looking at Dynatrace. I don't know if I have any advice for other organizations. The experience I have is only based on my own limited experience. However, I believe that the application has the potential to be really good if it identifies what is really important to an organization. It's still sort of half-baked without AppResponse. Without the other key features in infrastructure, like the network, firewalls, and proxies, it's lacking. It's not fully complete. I'd rate the solution six out of ten. It addresses some of our needs, but there's a lot lacking that could be added to make it a fuller, more interesting product.

Read full review

Eduardo Gallardo

Director of Technical Part at NOS SGPS

Dashboards facilitate prompt alerts but discovery feature needs enhancement

I would recommend Broadcom DX Application Performance Management if a customer doesn't have any existing performance solution. However, ten years ago, the solution was better, and now there are many competitive options. My overall rating would be between six and seven. The product rating I would give is 6.5 out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"By going to v10 it made our lives a whole lot easier because prior to v10, we had to put all of these assets, these Riverbed arguments, basically JVM start up itself."

"As an Administrator, before we bought this AppInternals, I didn't have visibility on why items were slow or why an application was not running, and this gives us the ability to see what's going on."

"Transaction Tracing is the most useful. Being able to have the transaction stitched together so we can see where the problem is has proven invaluable."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems, it's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise."

"From the experience I had with these three tools, I realized that Riverbed was superior in all aspects (performance, user experience, and features)."

"As an Administrator, before we bought this AppInternals, I didn't have visibility on why items were slow or why an application was not running. This gives us the ability to see what's going on. The application is load balancing. We can now see if its own server has issues or just one specific server has issues."

"Synthetic transactions, WMI and SNMP query capability."

"Mean time to isolate a problem has dropped by 50-75% in each region since we've deployed the Riverbed SteelCentral suite."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] pros

"The CA UIM is a very solid product; we love the simplicity of the robots and the agent installation and upgrading, because you can just do it right at your central station without rebooting the remote workstations or servers."

"We look forward to new features, because as technology grows we look to incorporate some of that newer technology in our monitoring solutions as well."

"APM 10 Team Center provides a faster way to diagnose environmental issues and complements the existing APM WebView."

"CA Introscope Workstation is the first tool that was quickly embraced by our developers and became one of the tools they use on a daily basis."

"Now, different teams can get info even before the system crashes and can take proactive steps and find the exact point to focus their efforts to fix it."

"Support from CA has been really, really phenomenal."

"MTTR has greatly improved, and teams are now better focused on the cause of application performance issues much earlier into any event."

"We are using the on-premise and cloud versions of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management pros

Cons

"The recording mechanism for synthetic transactions could be improved as well."

"Deployment and agent patch management is not managed centrally, resulting in a large level of effort to update."

"We'd like to be able to find out performance problems on application class and methods."

"It's not as good as it was three years ago before meddling by an activist investor, privatization, and subsequent layoffs hurt support."

"The technical support is not very good and should be improved."

"It wasn't a critical issue, but it was hot enough to where it would have been nice to get some guidance from Riverbed, but they went ahead and let us down, but that was only one occasion."

"It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."

"We have put in a request as an enhancement that we would like to search for items. If we're searching for a URL and we want to know was it a get or was it a post."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] cons

"Team Center requires a number of tweaks to allow per-user/group configuration to customize the interface for groups of users, though I believe these are already in the product roadmap."

"Improve the targeting interface is to make it more user-friendly and current."

"You can sell licenses and install the full tool on service, you can show customers how to install, but how to use it and solve issues cannot be done without the experience."

"The one thing that needs improving is the uplift of dashboards capabilities to HTML5 and flash based widgets."

"Compared to other tools, the technical support is not good."

"Right now, if I need to run some reports, I need to run some manual queries, which is very time consuming."

"They tried to streamline the organization, that was the initial point of using APM. It led to so many internal changes, but it didn’t affect the organization much at all in the end."

"Unfortunately, my application is Java version 6, and CA has removed support for Java 6 starting with CA APM, Version 10.5, where the Digital Experience Collector is available."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."

"Negotiate a lot, but do not forget to buy the product because it is worth it."

"All discounts are case by case to accommodate the client's budgets."

"There is some research needed to determine licensing costs, based on the number of DataPower instances for the Nastel agent, for example."

"The licensing costs are expensive."

"Depends on the size of the product you need."

"It is definitely expensive for what we get, but there isn't an alternate option at the moment."

"On pricing, CA is very competitive. I think that's going to help in the long run."

"I'm unable to give information on Broadcom DX Application Performance Management licensing costs, but all Application Performance Management products have expensive pricing. This means that it's not only Broadcom that's expensive, and it would be an advantage if the cost would be a little bit cheaper."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	124

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

The initial pricing is reasonable and competitive compared to other solutions. The challenge arises during annual renewals, as the price increase can be significant, around twenty percent or more, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

The first area for improvement is the discovery feature, which should be enhanced to collect comprehensive information from applications and services. This includes using agents or scripts to gathe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

Our primary use case involves having a large dashboard with significant information for alerts, alarms, and metrics to summarize the state of critical businesses and applications. When an issue ari...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Dynatrace vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Correlsense SharePath vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Datadog vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

IDERA Precise vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Competitors

Dynatrace vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 9% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 6% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Download Aternity AppInternals [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

May 2026

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management report

Download Broadcom DX Application Performance Management product report

Also Known As

SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert

DX APM, CA APM, CA NetQoS Performance Center, Wily Introscope, CA Wily APM, CA App Experience Analytics, CA AXA

Overview

Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

Riverbed

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management offers proactive alerting, transaction tracing, and root cause analysis. It enhances end-user experience management through efficient dashboards and customizable reporting, extending monitoring over Java and .NET applications.

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management delivers comprehensive monitoring and performance insights across cloud and Java applications. It proactively addresses issues with tools like Introscope for rapid error identification and Customer Experience Manager for end-user management. The software's dashboards consolidate performance data in real-time, helping organizations enhance debugging and incident management. Its low overhead and integration with service tools make it well-suited for production environments. However, it faces potential improvements in areas such as UI updates, agent management, automation, and seamless integration with new technologies.

What are the standout features?

Proactive Alerting: Identifies issues before they impact users.
Deep-Dive Transaction Tracing: Offers comprehensive tracking of transactions for detailed analysis.
Root Cause Analysis: Expedites problem-solving by pinpointing issues quickly.
Introscope: Facilitates rapid error detection and resolution.
Customer Experience Manager: Enhances management of user experiences effectively.
Real-Time Insights: Provides immediate views of performance data through interactive dashboards.
Customizable Reporting: Offers tailored report options for specific business needs.
Java and .NET Monitoring: Supports a range of applications, enhancing troubleshooting efficiency.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Issue Resolution Speed: Quick problem identification reduces downtime.
Performance Optimization: Enhances application efficiency, reducing costs.
Cost Reduction: Improves resource use and operational costs.
Dashboard Efficiency: Real-time, consolidated data offers transparency.

Organizations in logistics, banking, and e-commerce implement Broadcom DX Application Performance Management to monitor performance across crucial environments. Their usage involves enhancing performance, debugging, and proactive incident management for cloud and Java apps, with management dashboards supporting greater transparency in crash analytics and server health checks, ultimately improving user experience.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

National Instruments, Allianz

Lexmark, Intermountain Healthcare, National Australia Bank, BBVA Compass Bank, Innovapost, Dansk Supermarked Group, U.S. Cellular, Orange, Cetip

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.