No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] vs Digital.ai Deploy comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Digital.ai Deploy
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Release Automation (11th)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer895359 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Automatic installation for complex deployments and environments, with good workflow support
I like that really complex deployments are possible with it. It's very good. You have everything you need. You can design your workflows for your needs. You can do so much more, it's not just an automatic installation tool. It's a real deployment tool. I can do the complete deployment with everything that is possible.
Dorian Sezen - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Partner at Kloia
Good solution for heterogeneous enterprise environments that have different workflows
The solution is for heterogeneous enterprise environments that have different workflows like Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, and mainframe The solution creates a manifest file that caps the bridge between the developer and the system admin. The tool needs to improve on cloud-native GitOps. I have…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"At the end of the day, at the end of the year, CA offered the best package overall, and that wasn't just from a product standpoint but also a support standpoint."
"The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it."
"It can support very complex environments and dependencies."
"You can automate everything you want."
"Gives people insight into what's happening during the deployment."
"The measurement and the display functions make it easy to report all the statuses up to management, and it has helped our customers with their time, costs, and resources."
"The product provides efficiency, in terms time, cost, and resources."
"I would say our headwind, or our time to market, is reduced considerably. We get more consistent results out of it, because you write one time and once it's automated you expect it to behave the same way every time. And it cut down a lot of re-work for us."
"For us the flexibility of this product is nice, we can manage several things within one file and by giving parameters to the deployables."
"The product has a flexibility that allows it to work with various deployments and various technologies."
"This product is an innovative market leader in the field of application deployment."
"Jenkins deployment was hard to maintain different environments, different variables, machines etc., now we have it all under one roof."
"Quicker and more solid installations."
"The solution creates a manifest file that caps the bridge between the developer and the system admin."
"It has been a key enabler for us to implement Continuous Delivery and DevOps across the organisation, increasing release frequency by a factor of approximately 10 and reducing re-deployments by a factor of 50."
"The product sounds good thanks to its UI, as it is really easy to perform a deployment when things work."
 

Cons

"Stability-wise I think it still needs to be improved; performance-wise. It crashes from time to time."
"The first time setup can be very complicated."
"The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform."
"There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them."
"There are some bugs. For example, during the design of a workflow, important information is lost, it vanishes."
"key thing is support for cloud-based deployment. That is lacking."
"File transfer is not very efficient. It takes a bit longer than some other methods and when you send the file from one platform to another, especially from the mainframe, the results consumption is quite high compared to other methods."
"GUI for mobile phones: Availability to approve and start deployment through mobile phones."
"The tool needs to improve on cloud-native GitOps."
"Our customers have not been happy with technical support. They need to do much better to help clients solve issues."
"The basic design is broken, as it computes diffs to perform updates."
"I’d like better reporting possibilities."
"GUI: uses Adobe Flash which is a bit of a pain (Soon to be replaced by a new GUI with HTML5 and AngularJS)."
"The GUI deserves some improvements."
"Though the product is very good, I think the product can still be improved in a couple of ways."
"While it is a flexible product and provides a means of integrating with virtually anything, the company should make a better effort to keep up with new platform integrations."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."
"I can save time and money more quickly."
"If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."
"Customers often complain about the price."
"Pricing costs are based on annual subscriptions."
"The product’s pricing is acceptable. We get volume discounts."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
15%
Construction Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise2
 

Also Known As

CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform
Deployit, XLDeploy, XebiaLabs XL Deploy
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC
American Express, Xerox, Fandango, Rabobank, Cable & Wireless, Air France, 3M, GE, Liberty Mutual, EA
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Release Automation. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.