Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] vs Nolio Release Automation comparison

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] and Nolio Release Automation are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Nolio Release Automation users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 13 Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Nolio Release Automation

Read 51 Nolio Release Automation reviews

1,278 Views
1,227 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Nolio Release Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] and Nolio Release Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nolio Release Automation

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (7th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer895359

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Automatic installation for complex deployments and environments, with good workflow support

I like that really complex deployments are possible with it. It's very good. You have everything you need. You can design your workflows for your needs. You can do so much more, it's not just an automatic installation tool. It's a real deployment tool. I can do the complete deployment with everything that is possible.

Read full review

Akhilesh B N

DevOps Delivery Engineer at Barclays Capital

Real-time monitoring and seamless integration enhance deployment efficiency

The main disadvantage I see is the limited awareness of Nolio Release Automation in other organizations. It is a very nice tool, but its market presence is limited. I heard from the organization that the licensing cost was somewhat expensive. Perhaps focusing on marketing efforts would be beneficial. It is a really nice tool, and I am unsure why many organizations are not using Nolio Release Automation. It is one of the greatest tools for continuous deployment, yet its popularity remains limited. Some organizations are not aware of its existence. This might be an area worth researching and potentially developing new marketing strategies.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it."

"The metrics gathered after deployment, for example, the rate of success versus the rate of failure."

"Deployment workflow (WF) can be designed this way, so that it is not necessary to provide all applications (systems) artifacts of which an application consists."

"The measurement and the display functions make it easy to report all the statuses up to management, and it has helped our customers with their time, costs, and resources."

"Gives people insight into what's happening during the deployment."

"It gives us good feedback on visualizations and on how our processes have progressed."

"The IT process automation is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"You can automate everything you want."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] pros

"Ability to maintain the maps of different environments in a single tool."

"Applications that have been on boarded into the Release Automation application have shown a decrease in deployment time and down time for maintenance."

"In 12 days, we have automated this application and increased the deployment from 70 applications to 350 in three months."

"The UI makes it easier for non-engineers to understand."

"It has reduced deployment times from nearly a couple of hours to around a couple of minutes, especially on production environments."

"This is purely an automation tool which has helped us to move from traditional manual deployments to zero-touch deployments."

"The frictionless end-to-end, automated deployments remove manual handovers between different parties, making it fault-tolerant without human errors, technology-agnostic, and consolidated on one tool instead of multiple solutions with manual implementations."

"Our requirement was to deploy to 300 servers which used to take two to three days before CA RA, now it takes only two to four hours."

More Nolio Release Automation pros

Cons

"The first time setup can be very complicated."

"I would like to see more support for WebSphere."

"There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them."

"It would be very beneficial for us to see integrations into cloud environments, especially into the Google Cloud environment because we are heading towards cloud."

"Stability-wise I think it still needs to be improved; performance-wise. It crashes from time to time."

"There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system."

"At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2."

"The stability of the solution can be improved."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] cons

"Some of the existing action packs still have bugs which need to be fixed."

"If I were to consider investing in a new deployment automation tool, I wouldn't switch to CA Release Automation, because of the CA strategy."

"It does not support integration with Jenkins for .Net"

"In the next release, I would like to see more features to use active directory. And more rules to support more Python scripts and to work with Kubernetes and clouds, to have an easy solution for a lot of parameters."

"Error handling needs to be improved in some of the action packs."

"The configuration of the solution is a bit difficult to maneuver. They should work to make it easier."

"The performance degrades as the size of the workflow and the number of target servers increases."

"The level of abstraction in the VPL needs to improve."

More Nolio Release Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can save time and money more quickly."

"If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"Customers often complain about the price."

"Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

33%

Marketing Services Firm

17%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Nolio Release Automation?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nolio Release Automation?

I am working for an organization where they have been using Nolio Release Automation since 2016-2017. We are currently using version 6.6, and due to dependencies and lack of support from Broadcom, ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nolio Release Automation?

The 6.9 version offers significant improvements over 6.6. The dashboard is very appealing, showing information about applications and offline agents. We can easily remove offline agents and upgrade...

See all answers

Comparisons

UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

GitLab vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Competitors

OpenText Release Control vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 15% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 13% of the time

GitLab vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 13% of the time

Digital.ai Deploy vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 12% of the time

More Nolio Release Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

March 2026

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Nolio Release Automation

March 2026

Download Nolio Release Automation product report

Also Known As

CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform

CA Release Automation

Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

Broadcom

CA Release Automation enables you to seamlessly connect the continuous delivery ecosystem to deliver high-quality applications faster than ever before. With this enterprise-ready solution, you can accelerate and stabilize application deployments from development to test to production. Its advanced capabilities can help you plan, manage and optimize the continuous delivery pipeline to improve release quality and efficiency. With CA Release Automation, get automated, agile release management that’s ready to work in your IT world.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC

CA Release Automation customers include Citrix, NIIT Technologies, ING Bank, Molina Healthcare, Swisscom, Bupa and Tesco. Read case studies from customers who are igniting and advancing their continuous delivery journey with CA Release Automation.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.