Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] vs UrbanCode Deploy comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 13 Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

UrbanCode Deploy

Read 27 UrbanCode Deploy reviews

1,551 Views
1,489 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

UrbanCode Deploy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] and UrbanCode Deploy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UrbanCode Deploy

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (8th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer895359

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Automatic installation for complex deployments and environments, with good workflow support

I like that really complex deployments are possible with it. It's very good. You have everything you need. You can design your workflows for your needs. You can do so much more, it's not just an automatic installation tool. It's a real deployment tool. I can do the complete deployment with everything that is possible.

Read full review

AK13

DevOps Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A handy interface that includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality

Our company uses the solution for standard, blue-green, and complex deployments. We have 250 users throughout our company. The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently. The user interface includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality. It is easy to create component…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Gives people insight into what's happening during the deployment."

"The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done."

"Deployment workflow (WF) can be designed this way, so that it is not necessary to provide all applications (systems) artifacts of which an application consists."

"It provides a wonderful user interface which is easy to use."

"I would say our headwind, or our time to market, is reduced considerably. We get more consistent results out of it, because you write one time and once it's automated you expect it to behave the same way every time. And it cut down a lot of re-work for us."

"The IT process automation is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"You can design your workflows for your needs."

"Self-service for developers, because they are able to deploy to development departments on their own, without needing people from operations."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] pros

"The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently."

"Stable solution that's good for automating the CI/CD pipeline: from development to production."

"The most valuable feature is the snapshot functionality, which allows us to access previous versions of the artifacts."

"It is very easy to make a software release. It used to take us at least a couple of hours to make a release, now we went to production with a new one last night. This new release took me five minutes."

"The stability is good. I haven't experienced any issues."

"The most valuable functionality is the ability to define the deployment process, schedule the deployment and automatically execute the deployments to different environments."

Cons

"There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system."

"The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform."

"If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details."

"The stability of the solution can be improved."

"GUI for mobile phones: Availability to approve and start deployment through mobile phones."

"We hope that we can integrate the new CD Directive into our portfolio, so we can bring the deployment and release management closer together."

"I would like to see more support for WebSphere."

"At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] cons

"The scalability of this application needs improvement. Changes and variations in the application become bottlenecks as they need to be more seamless and comfortable."

"The interface allows access in a number of ways but that can be confusing."

"I certainly would like to have a better way to pass information between deployment steps using UrbanCode Deploy because that's really difficult to do."

"I would like to have the agent up and running at all times, as opposed to only while it is in the DevOps pipeline."

"I would like to see more reporting for container architecture."

"The technical support of the solution could definitely be improved as PMRs take long to resolve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can save time and money more quickly."

"Customers often complain about the price."

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."

"Considering COVID-19, the price is too high."

"The cost of the solution is high but it offers great ROI."

"The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

35%

Insurance Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	21

Comparisons

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 26% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Competitors

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 15% of the time

GitLab vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 13% of the time

Chef vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 10% of the time

AWS CodeDeploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 8% of the time

More UrbanCode Deploy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

February 2026

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

UrbanCode Deploy

January 2026

Download UrbanCode Deploy product report

Also Known As

CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform

uDeploy

Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

Broadcom

IBM UrbanCode Deploy orchestrates and automates the deployment of applications, middleware configuration, and database changes into development, test, and production environments—local, dedicated or shared cloud environments—accelerating time to market and reducing cost by shrinking manual efforts from days to minutes with automation, while reducing risk by cutting deployment errors by up to 90 percent.

IBM

Sample Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC

As policy, IBM does not release customer names on non-IBM web sites. However, public DevOps and UrbanCode Deploy case studies can be found here. IBM's UrbanCode Deploy customers span Small-Medium Businesses to Fortune 500 companies across all industries worldwide.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.