Automox vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune comparison

Automox and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Automox is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while Ivanti is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0. Automox holds a 2.2% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 20 Automox reviews

2,112 Views
908 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Read 11 Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune reviews

1,067 Views
1,067 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Automox

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and Automox are notable patch management solutions. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune leads in customer service and deployment, whereas Automox stands out for its robust feature set and overall value despite slightly higher costs.

Features: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune offers seamless integration with Intune, advanced automation capabilities, and detailed reporting. Automox is noted for cross-platform support, intuitive patch management, and comprehensive endpoint security.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune users suggest enhanced cross-platform support, more intuitive setup processes, and greater flexibility in settings. Automox users seek more granular control over patch deployments, faster customer support response times, and improvements in user interface customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune receives praise for straightforward deployment within the Intune ecosystem and responsive customer support. Automox is also noted for easy deployment across various platforms, with user feedback indicating a slightly steeper learning curve and variability in support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune users feel setup costs are justified by the integrated features within the Intune environment, achieving good ROI. Automox users mention higher initial costs but commend the ROI due to comprehensive feature sets and reduced manual intervention.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Patch Management

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (36th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (36th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (13th)

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Ranking in Patch Management

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 2.2%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is 2.6%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Automox	2.2%
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune	2.6%
Other	95.2%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Raphael Tiji

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Unified patching and remote access have strengthened security and reduced support overhead

Automox has significant potential and we truly appreciate its features and capabilities. However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool. We believe that with some improvement, it could replace other tools that we currently use. Exclusion for updates should be improved in Automox. Integration with Tenable vulnerability management should be improved, as it should be included. I do not have any other improvements needed for Automox that I have not mentioned yet, perhaps only small or wish-list features.

Read full review

Phung Anh

IT Administrator at FPT Software Strategic Unit no 17

Keeping servers updated while encountering documentation issues and time zone delays in support

In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing. Sometimes I had to uninstall, reinstall, or engage technical support, which took a lot of time. It would be helpful if the documentation could easily help us fix bugs on our own.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Automox is without a doubt the easiest patching tool I have ever used."

"Automox has positively impacted our organization since we started using this tool as it has been a game-changer for us."

"The biggest improvement to our organization involves the reduction in its man hours... We've probably saved hundreds of hours."

"Automox is a great tool to use on a daily basis as we use it to remotely connect to end-user machines, it is very cost-effective and simple to use, set up, and deploy, and with remote patching, scanning, and monitoring all in one panel, it has saved us money quickly by eliminating tools we no longer need in our organization."

"Automox is one of the best automatic patching management solutions that I have ever used in my entire organization."

"Automox's real-time visibility and control through its intuitive dashboard is important for our response to emerging threats because it tells us which applications need to be updated on a real-time basis."

"Coming from prior solutions that were a lot more effort, Automox's patch management abilities are transformational. When I took over patching at my company, they were using on-premise architecture to patch. As the workforce shifted from being in the office into their home offices, I was able to lift and shift with no effort other than deploying the new agent out into the environment."

"It's easy to deploy agents to endpoints."

More Automox pros

"The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows."

"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."

"I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."

"I have found the interface and ease of use valuable features. Additionally, it is very easy to patch VMs and other systems, such a Linux. We are able to do patches even without the internet manually."

"We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices."

"This is an extremely robust product, very easy to use, as well as extremely efficient and accurate, and most of our customers just set it and forget it while it does all of the automatic patching month after month."

"The technical support from Ivanti is good."

"It is very easy to use, as well as extremely efficient and accurate."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune pros

Cons

"The only thing that we've ever truly wanted is an onsite repository. Currently, all updates are provided directly from the internet. So, if you have 1,000 devices, all 1,000 devices go directly out to the internet. We would love the option of being able to put the updates on local storage so that we're not consuming as much bandwidth. That is literally the only thing that we've ever wanted."

"However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool."

"While Automox has very good features, I think there's still room for improvement."

"I would add that remote support for iOS could be better, and remote support of Linux is also lacking."

"The stability has come a long way from what it was like when it started and now it's really good."

"There should be better inventory capabilities. Right now, they only allow you to have insight into software out-of-the-box. It would be nice to also extend that into custom inventory that can be modified and managed by the practitioner."

"The biggest area they need to fix, without a doubt, is the ability to copy and sync profiles and worklets between all of the organizations you manage, and the ability to have top-level user access control across all of the companies that you manage."

"Automox can be improved as it can be pricey compared to other patch management solutions, especially when dealing with a lot of devices and endpoints."

More Automox cons

"In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing."

"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."

"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release."

"Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching."

"I would like to have better support for the application."

"The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide."

"It's a difficult configuration because you need to install many servers in a location, and you have to install the primary server in the main location."

"Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We're doing it annually directly through Automox. It is per endpoint. It is $2 and some change per endpoint, but I believe the cost is right around $28,000. Everything is covered in this fee."

"The product is a great value."

"We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use."

"The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us... My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier."

"For all these software tools, it is usually a subscription model. There is a monthly charge that we need to pass along to our clients because we are doing all this for their benefit. It is only a couple of bucks a month per computer, and that is a low enough price point where our clients, without exception, have accepted it, and said, "This is great. We will pay that. It sounds like a worthwhile thing.""

"There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get your support and your per endpoint license with what you purchased."

"Automox just charges us a set amount per user, per month, for using the product. That is very important to us. Because it's a cloud-native solution, you're saving on the cost of hosting an on-premises solution on your servers."

"The cost is very reasonable compared to the competition."

More Automox pricing and cost advice

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"The solution is affordable."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Automox?

Automox needs some improvement, particularly in that remote support for Linux is lacking. Additionally, remote support for iOS could be better. The integration is seamless.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automox?

Our main use case for Automox is that we as a company need to be Cyber Security Plus compliant, and therefore we need to ensure that our devices are patched regularly. Having over 1,000 devices, ma...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Automox?

Automox is a modern, simple-to-use, and powerful tool that works well for all sizes of organizations that have a mix of remote, hybrid, and endpoints. Automated patching is a key strength of Automo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Windows?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Patch for Windows?

The only downside I found regarding technical support was the time zone difference. Since we are two hours behind, we occasionally had to wait until the next morning for assistance. I would rate th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Windows?

The primary use case of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune ( /products/ivanti-neurons-patch-for-intune-reviews ) was primarily for updating all servers, ensuring that both main servers and production ...

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs Automox

Compared 3% of the time

More Automox Competitors

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 12% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 8% of the time

Scalefusion vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 5% of the time

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

March 2026

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

March 2026

Download Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ivanti Patch for Windows, Patch for Windows, Shavlik Patch for Windows

Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

Automox

Better protect against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

Improve protection against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications by extending Intune with risk-based third-party patch publishing – without any additional infrastructure.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Presbyterian Church

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

March 2026

Free Report: Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.