Automox vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune comparison

Automox and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Automox is ranked #14 with an average rating of 10.0, while Ivanti is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0. Automox holds a 2.2% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 12 Automox reviews

2,036 Views
875 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Read 11 Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune reviews

981 Views
981 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Automox

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and Automox are notable patch management solutions. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune leads in customer service and deployment, whereas Automox stands out for its robust feature set and overall value despite slightly higher costs.

Features: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune offers seamless integration with Intune, advanced automation capabilities, and detailed reporting. Automox is noted for cross-platform support, intuitive patch management, and comprehensive endpoint security.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune users suggest enhanced cross-platform support, more intuitive setup processes, and greater flexibility in settings. Automox users seek more granular control over patch deployments, faster customer support response times, and improvements in user interface customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune receives praise for straightforward deployment within the Intune ecosystem and responsive customer support. Automox is also noted for easy deployment across various platforms, with user feedback indicating a slightly steeper learning curve and variability in support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune users feel setup costs are justified by the integrated features within the Intune environment, achieving good ROI. Automox users mention higher initial costs but commend the ROI due to comprehensive feature sets and reduced manual intervention.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Patch Management

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (36th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (39th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (12th)

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Ranking in Patch Management

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 2.2%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is 2.4%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Automox	2.2%
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune	2.4%
Other	95.4%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automation has saved time and improves secure, centralized patching across all our devices

While Automox has very good features, I think there's still room for improvement. I want the custom reports to be even more detailed, specifically where I can add more details. It would be nice to have more filters in reports based on location and department more easily. Secondly, the notifications could be more customizable. Many times notifications come, but we don't have control over which notification is urgent and which is not. For example, if there's an alert of a critical update or pending approval, it can help me focus better. An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important. Customized notifications would be much better.I would say the user interface could be improved as well. Some parts of the dashboard are a bit hard to understand. If they could be improved to be more intuitive, for example, if it could be easy to navigate between devices and reports, that would be great. I would say if Automox could also provide automation templates, that would help. I know there are templates, but I want more templates. Having ready-made worklets for common tasks can save a lot of time. Lastly, it should also support the interface for mobile screens.

Read full review

Phung Anh

IT Administrator at FPT Software Strategic Unit no 17

Keeping servers updated while encountering documentation issues and time zone delays in support

In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing. Sometimes I had to uninstall, reinstall, or engage technical support, which took a lot of time. It would be helpful if the documentation could easily help us fix bugs on our own.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its flexibility is most valuable."

"Automox's real-time visibility and control through its intuitive dashboard is important for our response to emerging threats because it tells us which applications need to be updated on a real-time basis."

"The biggest improvement to our organization involves the reduction in its man hours... We've probably saved hundreds of hours."

"They've been adding some new features lately, which I'm not nearly as familiar with, but the ability to just deploy patches and exempt certain machines from certain patches is helpful. For instance, for our servers, we may not want to roll out zero-day patches. We are able to exempt those and make sure that they don't get those policies. We've got certain servers that have to run a particular version of Java, and being able to exempt those servers from receiving Java updates is pretty fantastic."

"The fact that it's just one product that can patch multiple operating systems is really great."

"Coming from prior solutions that were a lot more effort, Automox's patch management abilities are transformational. When I took over patching at my company, they were using on-premise architecture to patch. As the workforce shifted from being in the office into their home offices, I was able to lift and shift with no effort other than deploying the new agent out into the environment."

"It's super easy to use and we haven't found anything easier."

"Out of all these features, if I had to pick one which I'm relying on the most, I would say the automatic patching, because it saves a lot of time and ensures all devices are updated."

More Automox pros

"I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."

"I have found the interface and ease of use valuable features. Additionally, it is very easy to patch VMs and other systems, such a Linux. We are able to do patches even without the internet manually."

"It is very easy to use, as well as extremely efficient and accurate."

"We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices."

"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."

"The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows."

"The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications."

"We can set a maintenance window and push the patch."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune pros

Cons

"We would like to see additional detailed reporting for Service providers like us. We had to build our own reports via their APIs to meet our needs."

"As concerns the patching concepts, there's a bit of a learning curve in terms of working out how Automox wants you to work within the console, not only splitting up everything into groups, but then having the various policies assigned."

"There should be better inventory capabilities. Right now, they only allow you to have insight into software out-of-the-box. It would be nice to also extend that into custom inventory that can be modified and managed by the practitioner."

"Asset management would be a great feature to add to Automox. We would run easier scripts or more out of the box scripts that would help us in audits. \"

"It should have integrated workstation access. So, there should be a remote desktop feature."

"The only thing that we've ever truly wanted is an onsite repository. Currently, all updates are provided directly from the internet. So, if you have 1,000 devices, all 1,000 devices go directly out to the internet. We would love the option of being able to put the updates on local storage so that we're not consuming as much bandwidth. That is literally the only thing that we've ever wanted."

"They need to improve the automation features."

"When we bring on a new client, we need to go into that client and manually set up my account, my chief engineer's account, three technicians' accounts, and a billing person's account all over again, which is annoying. We have probably up to 15 or 16 of our clients on Automox now. For every single one of those, we have had to go in and set this up. Then, if anything changes, we have to remember to go to Automox and change it 15 or 16 times. So, we just want inheritable permissions, and that is it. We have talked to them about this, and they are like, "Yeah, we hear a lot of complaints about it." I am thinking, "Guys, I have been complaining about this for a year and a half. When are you going to do it?" It must be some tricky thing or not an easy fix, because I can only assume if it were easy, then they would have done it by now."

More Automox cons

"I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."

"Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching."

"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."

"The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide."

"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release."

"It's a difficult configuration because you need to install many servers in a location, and you have to install the primary server in the main location."

"The product's support and configuration need to improve. It needs to be more scalable."

"Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use."

"We're doing it annually directly through Automox. It is per endpoint. It is $2 and some change per endpoint, but I believe the cost is right around $28,000. Everything is covered in this fee."

"Its licensing for a year was nine grand. There was no additional fee."

"The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us... My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier."

"Automox just charges us a set amount per user, per month, for using the product. That is very important to us. Because it's a cloud-native solution, you're saving on the cost of hosting an on-premises solution on your servers."

"The product is a great value."

"For all these software tools, it is usually a subscription model. There is a monthly charge that we need to pass along to our clients because we are doing all this for their benefit. It is only a couple of bucks a month per computer, and that is a low enough price point where our clients, without exception, have accepted it, and said, "This is great. We will pay that. It sounds like a worthwhile thing.""

"There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get your support and your per endpoint license with what you purchased."

More Automox pricing and cost advice

"The solution is affordable."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Automox?

I wouldn't be able to tell you how Automox can be improved; it seems to work very nicely already.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automox?

We use Automox to maintain the software on all our computers. We were using Qualys before and we're still using it, but we found Qualys to be a little bit lacking since it wasn't really eliminating...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Automox?

Since switching over from Qualys, we have seen no positive impacts for our organization other than being able to update the applications on an endpoint. We haven't used Automox's reporting capabili...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Windows?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Patch for Windows?

The only downside I found regarding technical support was the time zone difference. Since we are two hours behind, we occasionally had to wait until the next morning for assistance. I would rate th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Windows?

The primary use case of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune ( /products/ivanti-neurons-patch-for-intune-reviews ) was primarily for updating all servers, ensuring that both main servers and production ...

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 11% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Vicarius vRx vs Automox

Compared 3% of the time

More Automox Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 12% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 12% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 9% of the time

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 5% of the time

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

February 2026

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

February 2026

Download Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ivanti Patch for Windows, Patch for Windows, Shavlik Patch for Windows

Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

Automox

Better protect against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

Improve protection against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications by extending Intune with risk-based third-party patch publishing – without any additional infrastructure.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Presbyterian Church

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

December 2025

Free Report: Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.