

Kaseya VSA and Automox compete in IT management and endpoint security. Automox seems to have the upper hand due to its cloud-native approach and ease of use, despite Kaseya VSA’s advanced automation capabilities.
Features: Kaseya VSA offers robust remote monitoring and management tools, advanced automation capabilities, and extensive patch management features. Automox provides efficient endpoint management, real-time visibility, and automated workflows, with simplicity and effectiveness being its strengths.
Room for Improvement: Kaseya VSA could enhance performance, reduce complexity in administrative tasks, and improve ease of use. Automox could expand its reporting features, offer greater customization of patching policies, and enrich its feature set.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaseya VSA’s deployment is comprehensive but can be complex and time-consuming, with mixed reviews on customer service response time and effectiveness. Automox is praised for quick, straightforward deployment and responsive support, suitable for rapid implementation.
Pricing and ROI: Kaseya VSA has higher initial setup costs justified by its extensive feature set and substantial ROI. Automox offers competitive pricing with immediate ROI due to its simplicity and reduced resource requirements, making it cost-effective for many businesses.
It has also been a great tool because we are able to reduce both manual labor and operational expenses by automating patching of roughly 200 Windows servers.
It's saving about 70% to 80% of time.
They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.
They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.
The customer support for Automox is very responsive and proactive.
I would evaluate them as most likely all good because they help me a lot, and they most likely solve my issue.
The customer service provides a fast response.
I would rate their support five out of ten because most of the time they are not able to resolve the issues.
It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.
Automox is very scalable because it has continued to handle my organization's growth.
It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime.
I would add that remote support for iOS could be better, and remote support of Linux is also lacking.
An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important.
I would like to see improved or enhanced scripting capabilities where I can create scripts based on automation by using AI.
Automox's price is very cost-effective and affordable.
It's always expensive for the customer.
Out of all these features, if I had to pick one which I'm relying on the most, I would say the automatic patching.
It has also improved our security posture since automated patching has allowed vulnerabilities to be patched automatically.
Regarding the patching and software management, for me, it's the best path.
Kaseya VSA makes it easier for me to use, especially with the ability to control everything from the console.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Kaseya VSA | 5.3% |
| Automox | 2.6% |
| Other | 92.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Automox offers automated patch management with cloud-native architecture, cross-platform compatibility, and ease of use. It provides real-time visibility and streamlines operations across Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it ideal for complex IT environments.
Automox empowers organizations with features like Worklets and remote management, enhancing security and efficiency through customizable patching policies, PowerShell script execution, and detailed reporting. It's primarily used for automated patch management, patch remediation, and compliance maintenance across diverse systems, ensuring cybersecurity and reducing vulnerabilities. Enhancements are desired for user access control, policy synchronization, and integration with tools like Tenable. Support for offline patching, rollback features, enhanced reporting, and notification customization are in demand. Improvements in cost effectiveness and multi-group policy applications are also suggested.
What are the key features of Automox?In industry applications, Automox is widely used for managing and updating vast fleets of devices, particularly in sectors requiring stringent cybersecurity measures. It ensures seamless operations through its centralized automation and management capabilities, making it essential for organizations handling extensive IT networks.
Kaseya VSA offers comprehensive IT management, featuring remote and patch management alongside automation. Its efficient administration and security improvements make it a reliable choice for managed IT services.
Kaseya VSA is a robust platform used for remote management, patch and inventory management, monitoring, and automation, making it an ideal choice for managed service providers. Its integration with Kaseya BMS and flexible configuration enhance technical support tasks while robust security measures have been improved since past breaches. However, it requires improvements in security, patch management, mobile device management, and support for various platforms including Mac. Users face challenges with outdated interfaces and cumbersome reporting, needing better integration with technologies like Azure.
What are the most important features of Kaseya VSA?In industries like healthcare, finance, and retail, Kaseya VSA is implemented to manage complex IT environments, support network security compliance, and automate routine tasks. Managed service providers leverage its capabilities for client network support, ensuring secure, efficient IT operations.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.