

Tenable Vulnerability Management and Automox compete in cybersecurity, each offering distinct advantages. Tenable has an edge in vulnerability assessments due to its comprehensive threat insights, while Automox holds an upper hand in automation and cost-effectiveness, aligning with operational efficiency needs.
Features: Tenable delivers detailed vulnerability insights, ongoing risk prioritization, and precision in threat assessment. Automox is noted for automated patch management, cross-platform compatibility, and seamless updates with security configurations.
Room for Improvement: Tenable could improve by simplifying its user interface, enhancing real-time update capabilities, and reducing deployment time. Automox may enhance its vulnerability assessment depth, improve integration with other tools, and offer more customization options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable provides a robust deployment model with extensive customization and an efficient customer service team for smooth integration in diverse IT environments. Automox offers a quick, cloud-based deployment process, simplifying initial setup with direct and efficient customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Tenable follows a traditional pricing model, offering high ROI through detailed coverage in vulnerability management. Automox's cost-effective pricing optimizes operational costs, providing strong ROI with efficient endpoint management.
Our team used to spend 10 hours per week just to update these things, and now we're doing it automatically.
They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.
They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.
It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly.
The technical support of Tenable Vulnerability Management is available 24/7, and whenever we require support, we can get it within five minutes.
We had used Tenable's expert support services in order to make sure that we run Tenable Vulnerability Management on a continuous basis and are able to utilize their services.
It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.
They can seamlessly scale the number of endpoints from 100 to 1,000,000 in a day.
Tenable Vulnerability Management is highly scalable.
With the growing needs of our company, Tenable Vulnerability Management is able to safely adapt.
It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime.
I have faced no stability issues with Tenable.
The stability is commendable, and I would rate Tenable ten out of ten.
The stability of Tenable Vulnerability Management is highly reliable.
An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important.
They should also accelerate the process of implementing new features upon request.
I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io.
Tenable Vulnerability Management is not very effective for real-time risk prioritization for our organization's security strategy.
Tenable charges around $40 per device, while Rapid7 costs $10 to $15 per device.
I would not say very expensive for Tenable Vulnerability Management; it is not prohibitive, but at the same time, there are some other tools in the marketplace which are offering the same kind of services that Tenable offers, the same kind of features that Tenable has offered at a lesser cost.
One of the best features I appreciate about Automox is automated patching.
Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.
The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment.
The best features of Tenable Vulnerability Management are flexibility, breadth and scope, and the fact that their current vulnerabilities come out, and they have tests for them within a day or two.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Tenable Vulnerability Management | 3.2% |
| Automox | 0.5% |
| Other | 96.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.
Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.
Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.
Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.