Automox vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Automox and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Automox is ranked #36 with an average rating of 9.0, while Tenable is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8. Automox holds a 0.5% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 20 Automox reviews

2,112 Views
781 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Read 45 Tenable Vulnerability Management reviews

7,009 Views
6,028 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Automox

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Tenable Vulnerability Management and Automox compete in cybersecurity, each offering distinct advantages. Tenable has an edge in vulnerability assessments due to its comprehensive threat insights, while Automox holds an upper hand in automation and cost-effectiveness, aligning with operational efficiency needs.

Features: Tenable delivers detailed vulnerability insights, ongoing risk prioritization, and precision in threat assessment. Automox is noted for automated patch management, cross-platform compatibility, and seamless updates with security configurations.

Room for Improvement: Tenable could improve by simplifying its user interface, enhancing real-time update capabilities, and reducing deployment time. Automox may enhance its vulnerability assessment depth, improve integration with other tools, and offer more customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable provides a robust deployment model with extensive customization and an efficient customer service team for smooth integration in diverse IT environments. Automox offers a quick, cloud-based deployment process, simplifying initial setup with direct and efficient customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable follows a traditional pricing model, offering high ROI through detailed coverage in vulnerability management. Automox's cost-effective pricing optimizes operational costs, providing strong ROI with efficient endpoint management.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.9

Automox enhances efficiency in patch management, saving time and resources, improving compliance, and offering better visibility and security.

Sentiment score

7.0

Tenable Vulnerability Management offers cost-effective vulnerability identification, improving processes, visibility, automation, and IT ecosystems despite financial metric uncertainties.

It is a cloud-based solution, so you do not need on-premises infrastructure, which saves hardware.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

It has also been a great tool because we are able to reduce both manual labor and operational expenses by automating patching of roughly 200 Windows servers.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

Offered an additional remote solution, all while saving a lot of time and cost through troubleshooting.

William Pep

Project Engineer at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.2

Automox’s customer service is highly praised for responsiveness, expertise, and efficiency, surpassing larger companies in user satisfaction.

Sentiment score

6.1

Tenable Support is responsive and knowledgeable, though response times and escalation process for complex issues can improve.

They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.

Robert Araya

Network & Security Administrator at a legal firm with 51-200 employees

They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

The customer support has been excellent as the support team is always responsive and proactive.

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The technical support of Tenable Vulnerability Management is available 24/7, and whenever we require support, we can get it within five minutes.

Chethan Gowda

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

We had used Tenable's expert support services in order to make sure that we run Tenable Vulnerability Management on a continuous basis and are able to utilize their services.

TarunKumar2

Deputy Global Chief Information Security Officer at Nissan Digital

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.3

Automox is highly scalable and cloud-based, effectively managing numerous devices, despite minor manageability and console load time issues.

Sentiment score

7.6

Tenable Vulnerability Management scales effectively for various sectors, leveraging cloud-based infrastructure and lightweight agents for seamless deployment.

It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automox scalability is excellent because it caters to my organization needs and can handle our organizational needs, ensuring that all our devices are well patched.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

Automox's scalability is excellent as it has continued to grow with my organization and caters to my organization's needs.

William Pep

Project Engineer at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

They can seamlessly scale the number of endpoints from 100 to 1,000,000 in a day.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Tenable Vulnerability Management is highly scalable.

Chethan Gowda

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

With the growing needs of our company, Tenable Vulnerability Management is able to safely adapt.

TarunKumar2

Deputy Global Chief Information Security Officer at Nissan Digital

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.1

Automox is praised for its stability, reliable performance, prompt incident response, and efficient patching, with minimal downtime.

Sentiment score

8.1

Tenable Vulnerability Management is praised for its reliable, stable performance, minimal downtime, and longstanding market reputation.

It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

I have not experienced any lagging or downtime

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

I can confirm that Automox is very stable.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

I have faced no stability issues with Tenable.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The stability is commendable, and I would rate Tenable ten out of ten.

Rishabh-Khanna

Technical Lead at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

The stability of Tenable Vulnerability Management is highly reliable.

Chethan Gowda

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Room For Improvement

Automox needs better sync, user access, automation, UI, bandwidth management, notifications, reports, and remote support for Linux/iOS.

Users criticize Tenable's interface, customization, pricing, support, setup complexity, and suggest improvements for SMB compatibility and user-friendliness.

Anything that can predict imminent failure of the device would be great.

PaulWalker2

Software Engineer at Unilever Inc.

An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

The integration is seamless.

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

They should also accelerate the process of implementing new features upon request.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io.

Rishabh-Khanna

Technical Lead at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Tenable Vulnerability Management is not very effective for real-time risk prioritization for our organization's security strategy.

Chethan Gowda

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Setup Cost

Automox offers cost-effective per-endpoint pricing, scalability, and comprehensive support with a valuable free trial for evaluation.

Tenable Vulnerability Management is costly, with prices from $2,300 to $137,000, suitable for enterprises but pricey for SMBs.

Cost reduction has been noticeable, ranging from 50% to 40%, especially because we do not have to travel from one place to another to go on site and troubleshoot devices.

Raphael Tiji

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Automox's price is very cost-effective and affordable.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

the price has always been competitive and very cost-effective

William Pep

Project Engineer at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

Tenable charges around $40 per device, while Rapid7 costs $10 to $15 per device.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I would not say very expensive for Tenable Vulnerability Management; it is not prohibitive, but at the same time, there are some other tools in the marketplace which are offering the same kind of services that Tenable offers, the same kind of features that Tenable has offered at a lesser cost.

TarunKumar2

Deputy Global Chief Information Security Officer at Nissan Digital

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Valuable Features

Automox offers automated, cloud-native patching with cross-platform compatibility, customizable worklets, and an intuitive dashboard for simplified security management.

Tenable offers seamless interface, robust scanning, and integration, with AI-driven prioritization and continuous updates for effective vulnerability management.

One of the best features I appreciate about Automox is automated patching.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automox allows me to patch all devices regardless of the operating system.

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

It has also improved our security posture since automated patching has allowed vulnerabilities to be patched automatically.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment.

Chethan Gowda

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

The best features of Tenable Vulnerability Management are flexibility, breadth and scope, and the fact that their current vulnerabilities come out, and they have tests for them within a day or two.

reviewer2721399

SOC Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

36th

Ranking in Patch Management

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (36th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (13th)

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

5th

Ranking in Patch Management

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 3.1%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tenable Vulnerability Management	3.1%
Automox	0.5%
Other	96.4%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Raphael Tiji

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Unified patching and remote access have strengthened security and reduced support overhead

Automox has significant potential and we truly appreciate its features and capabilities. However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool. We believe that with some improvement, it could replace other tools that we currently use. Exclusion for updates should be improved in Automox. Integration with Tenable vulnerability management should be improved, as it should be included. I do not have any other improvements needed for Automox that I have not mentioned yet, perhaps only small or wish-list features.

Read full review

Chethan Gowda

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Have maintained accurate vulnerability scans and gained actionable remediation insights across thousands of servers

Tenable Vulnerability Management agents are very lightweight, and the results we get are very accurate. The solutions they provide to us, assuming if one vulnerability exists, there will be a solution. The resolution they give us in wording will be the best solution. The exploit rates and the reports we get provide a lot of information, making it very easy for us to verify.The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment. That is one of the key aspects of why we have integrated Tenable to our patching tools. It has a vast capacity of pushing the data to our tools due to its capability and compatibility. That is also one of the reasons why we are using Tenable Vulnerability Management.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Automox?

Automox needs some improvement, particularly in that remote support for Linux is lacking. Additionally, remote support for iOS could be better. The integration is seamless.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automox?

Our main use case for Automox is that we as a company need to be Cyber Security Plus compliant, and therefore we need to ensure that our devices are patched regularly. Having over 1,000 devices, ma...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Automox?

Automox is a modern, simple-to-use, and powerful tool that works well for all sizes of organizations that have a mix of remote, hybrid, and endpoints. Automated patching is a key strength of Automo...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I don't think that there is any very specific area where enhancements need to happen in Tenable Vulnerability Management's feature sets. The only area which possibly is not a part of the feature, b...

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Automox

Compared 6% of the time

More Automox Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

March 2026

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.io

Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

Automox

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

March 2026

Free Report: Automox vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.