Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs ManageEngine IT360 comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Auvik and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Auvik is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while ManageEngine is ranked #84. Auvik holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 216 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

18,634 Views
12,485 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT360

Read 5 ManageEngine IT360 reviews

3,407 Views
1,976 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

ManageEngine IT360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ManageEngine IT360 and Auvik Network Management are competing network management solutions. Auvik seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features that justify its cost.

Features: ManageEngine IT360 offers integrated network, server, and application monitoring, providing a comprehensive IT management approach. It supports multivendor environments, customized dashboards, and SLA monitoring. Auvik focuses on automated network discovery, features real-time network mapping, and offers traffic analysis through NetFlow. ANM's advanced automation and network documentation provide feature advantages.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine IT360 could improve its automation capabilities, offer more intuitive user interfaces, and enhance the speed of deployment. Auvik could expand its support for non-networking devices, enhance its alerting system, and improve scalability options for larger organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine IT360 requires more time for deployment due to its comprehensive set of capabilities and complex setup. Its support documentation is detailed but less accessible. Auvik offers a simple, cloud-based deployment model, speeding up integration, and provides strong customer support with clearer implementation guidance.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine IT360 is noted for its reasonable initial costs, supporting adoption in smaller organizations. Auvik, despite its higher upfront cost, delivers greater long-term ROI through reduced network management time and proactive monitoring features, making it a worthwhile investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ManageEngine IT360 Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ManageEngine IT360

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

4th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

216

Ranking in other categories

Network Troubleshooting (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

ManageEngine IT360

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

84th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

70th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine IT360 is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.2%
ManageEngine IT360	0.5%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AmanThakkar

Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.

Network automation has reduced troubleshooting time and supports faster issue resolution

The biggest and best feature I have experienced with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is automatic network discovery, along with features such as topology map, instant alerts, real-time monitoring, easy remote access, and simple dashboards. Among those features, I find automatic network discovery to be the most useful because it gives a clear picture of the entire network without having to create manual diagrams. It is very easy to use Auvik Network Management (ANM), so even a new team member can quickly understand the network because everything is displayed in a very clear way. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted our organization by reducing troubleshooting time, improving network visibility, providing a very clear picture, and helping us support multiple client networks and environments very efficiently. We have noticed a 35 to 40% improvement in troubleshooting speed, less manual work in documenting any network system, faster responses to network issues, and better uptime with the client networks.

Read full review

Ziyad Moghalis

It manager at PTC (Public Telecomuncation Corporation)

Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy

This solution is good for configuration management. The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training. ManageEngine is easy to deploy. It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network. The alerting capability is good and it will send out emails.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Auvik's features for monitoring device availability and bandwidth utilization have greatly helped us. From a cybersecurity perspective, bandwidth utilization tells us if we have a potential data exfiltration incident. It also helps us decide whether to increase the bandwidth for one of the links or if the current bandwidth is sufficient."

"We saw several warnings on several of our older switches. We would not have seen this stuff unless we had gone into these switches and read through these logs on our own, but Auvik was holding this data and giving us these warnings so that we could go in and sort out what was wrong."

"Every week, we save hours."

"Auvik has decreased our mean time to resolution by 50%."

"Traffic insights are valuable. They show you what type of traffic is on the network and how much bandwidth it is utilizing. It can help you pinpoint issues if a device is broadcasting too much or if there is any other issue."

"I like Auvik's mapping. Your home dashboard has a map view where you can see potential issues on the endpoints. If an AP or switch has a problem, you can drill down into those to see how it's affecting the endpoints."

"At this point in time, it's an invaluable piece of what we do."

"The monitoring and management functions of Auvik are as easy as they can be for the functions they do. It's definitely the easiest product I've ever used."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"The technical support is good."

"The primary use case of this solution is to manage and to protect the web servers, the mail server, and the website in my company."

"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."

"Customer Service: Absolutely fantastic."

"All I know is that when it comes to managing the active directory, ManageEngine is something I consider to be the best."

"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."

"I would suggest you use this product as it's easy for administration, and is based on distributed model support."

"The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training."

Cons

"They can maybe provide some more best practices or guidance around how large a network should be. They can provide some cutoff points, such as, if you have 30 network devices, you might want to chunk that into a smaller subset or site. They can help you better plan and design how to create your Auvik sites, especially if you have a large environment."

"I've been finding some features difficult. It might be because I'm used to PRTG, and Auvik works differently. When it comes to monitoring a simple IP address, Auvik makes it a bit harder and more complex because you have to create a service inside the site. It's not just creating a sensor and having it ping the device. You need to go to the site and create the service."

"We have a few other networking tools. Some of them are specifically for managing Wi-Fi. They have some great features where they give specific recommendations based on the network traffic they're seeing and based on other customers that have had similar issues, or even just by looking at your own data that they're gathering. They give AI-based recommendations on how to improve the network. Auvik could have something like that. It gives us excellent visibility into the network, but if there is a way to include some remediation tips that are digestible by level-one and level-two techs, that would be great."

"Sometimes we get a generic device, then we can't tell what it is quickly from the details. Just having a better knowledge-based integration for determining what devices are, what they're make and models are, would be helpful."

"Auvik mostly supports large vendors such as the Cisco Aruba networks, Meraki, and Extreme Networks."

"I take off that one point for Auvik Network Management (ANM) due to the initial setup."

"It's rare, but sometimes the actual application itself can be a little slow. That's because of the amount of data that it is pulling from remote networks. That has been my only complaint with it and it's really not even a complaint. But if the speed of the application were to improve, it would help a lot."

"More capabilities in terms of default OIDs, so we can leverage more of the information from SNMP would be good to see."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."

"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."

"The GUI could be improved."

"ManageEngine needs to fix the downtime scheduler for SNMP monitored devices. Alarms are still generated for the devices placed into scheduled maintenance."

"This is because of the lack of available technical knowledge in terms of competence and maximizing the power of the product."

"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They charge for switches and some networking hardware, but everything else is free."

"The pricing is kind of steep, but it's worth the price. There's no beating around the bush. It's an expensive solution, but it's really the best solution there is for us."

"The pricing is fair for the value and time saved that you get out of it. The larger you go, the more sense it makes per device, because as you hit different pricing tiers, it becomes much more affordable per device."

"Auvik is fairly priced. The cost is what we expected considering network management. The benefits outweigh the cost for us."

"The pricing for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is great; it is comparable to other solutions, and for what it does, it actually provides more value for the money than some of the other major competitors."

"The pricing was a little bit higher. They can work on that as everybody wants to save money."

"Its pricing is a little on the high end. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. It is more expensive than other solutions, but their per-device model is very fair. Anything other than the networking gear is monitored by Auvik at no charge."

"The pricing is good for what it does. It has been a few months, so I do not remember exactly how much it was. I believe for our network here, it was about 2,000 a year, so the pricing was good. A lot of printers and things of that nature are not one of the charged devices."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

28%

Comms Service Provider

18%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	156
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is average. The cost is typically higher for these kinds of tools, so it is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options. While there are options for reporting, having more clarity would be helpful, along with more advanced analytics and mor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

Our main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to monitor and manage the client networks, helping us to track the network devices and identify issues quickly to monitor the performance and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Zabbix vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 7% of the time

USU Valuemation vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 5% of the time

Netreo vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 5% of the time

ServiceNow vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 4% of the time

Packetbeat vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine IT360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

September 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2026

Download ManageEngine IT360 product report

Also Known As

No data available

IT360

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

ManageEngine IT360 is a comprehensive tool crafted for IT management, offering a robust framework to monitor and manage network infrastructure efficiently.

Designed for IT professionals, ManageEngine IT360 integrates IT management and network monitoring, offering seamless oversight of an organization's entire IT framework. Users gain insights into performance, data flow, and bottlenecks, assisting in maintaining optimal infrastructure efficiency. It provides actionable intelligence to support informed decision-making.

What are the key features of ManageEngine IT360?

Comprehensive Network Monitoring: Provides detailed metrics for tracking and maintaining network performance.
Fault Management: Quickly identifies issues for prompt resolution, minimizing downtime.
Performance Management: Continuously evaluates system performance to ensure IT assets are operating as expected.
Help Desk Integration: Facilitates streamlined support processes through seamless module integration.
Server Monitoring: Delivers insights into server health and performance metrics, aiding in proactive management.

What benefits and ROI should be considered when evaluating ManageEngine IT360?

Cost Efficiency: Provides comprehensive management tools reducing the need for multiple software investments.
Productivity Enhancement: Minimizes downtime improving productivity across IT teams.
Improved Decision Making: Offers real-time data aiding strategic infrastructure planning.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing IT requirements, ensuring long-term solution viability.

ManageEngine IT360 finds its application across industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. In finance, it enhances data security and network reliability, critical for transactional integrity. Healthcare sectors use it to ensure system uptime crucial for patient management systems. Manufacturing sectors rely on it for uninterrupted operations, ensuring system efficiencies align with production demands.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Khimji Ramdas, RME Global, Bank of Namibia, DORMA, PMSI, National Commodities Exchange, EMA, Redstone, First Source

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ManageEngine IT360

September 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ManageEngine IT360

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ManageEngine IT360 and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ManageEngine IT360 report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.