Avantra vs Elastic Observability comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Avantra and Elastic are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Avantra is ranked #52, while Elastic is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0. Avantra holds a 1.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Elastic’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Avantra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

Avantra

Read 5 Avantra reviews

5,892 Views
3,594 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Read 29 Elastic Observability reviews

11,859 Views
7,590 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Avantra

Elastic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Avantra and Elastic Observability are prominent products in the IT monitoring and observability space. Elastic Observability seems to have the upper hand due to its superior feature set.

Features: Avantra offers automated monitoring and performance management, particularly valuable for SAP landscapes. Elastic Observability provides robust real-time analytics, search capabilities, and seamless integration with various data sources, making it more comprehensive and versatile for diverse IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Avantra users suggest enhancements in dashboard customization, additional integration options, and wider adaptability. Elastic Observability users request improvements in scalability, resource consumption reduction, and optimized performance for large-scale usage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Avantra has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, contributing to a positive user experience. Elastic Observability's deployment is more complex, and its support is seen as less responsive compared to Avantra.

Pricing and ROI: Avantra offers better initial setup costs and quicker ROI, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers. Elastic Observability, though higher in cost, demonstrates excellent long-term value with its advanced features and capabilities, often considered worth the investment by many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Avantra vs. Elastic Observability Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Avantra vs. Elastic Observability

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avantra

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

52nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

52nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SAP Service Providers (12th), Server Monitoring (28th)

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

10th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (14th), Container Monitoring (6th), Cloud Monitoring Software (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Avantra is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Observability is 1.6%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Elastic Observability	1.6%
Avantra	1.3%
Other	97.1%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mani Velayudhan

Manager, SAP Basis at The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company

Useful automation capabilities, scales well, and simple implementation

We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities. Looking ahead to future releases, I would like to see more advanced automation features. As a long-term goal, I am considering the possibility of automating SAP system upgrades. While this would not be an easy feat, advancements in technology may make it feasible in the future. Overall, a key feature I hope to see in future releases is increased automation capabilities.

Read full review

Stefan Decuypere

Technology Consultant at Hybrid software

Real-time dashboards and visual insights have streamlined issue analysis and monitoring

After careful consideration about areas for improvement in Elastic Observability, aspects such as pricing, customization, implementation, and scalability could be improved. As a user of the system, I know what it costs but am not directly involved in cost-benefit evaluations or maintenance, which is handled by another team. I develop the visual representation of the data and frankly, I don't see major gaps in my application or anything I would really miss; I appreciate the fast pace of the developments that have occurred in the last couple of years. Regarding room for improvement in Elastic Observability, I would have preferred built-in tools to manage the indexes on deployment for better visual representation, as the initial feedback regarding system performance and data storage was fairly primitive and lacking.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's just very user-friendly, and it's very easy to monitor the servers using Avantra."

"It's very easy to manage and use."

"I definitely recommend this solution, it provides good value for money."

"It prevented two major failures in our SAP production systems."

"Deployment was amazingly short and simple; I do not think I have seen any SAP-related product installs ready to work so fast, and out-of-box it included most of the functions and settings that we needed."

"You can customize alerts based on need."

"The most valuable feature of Avantra is automation. The reduction of manual work and having them automated is one of the top reasons why I would use it."

"It is very stable, and I would rate it ten out of ten based on my interaction with it."

"The price is very less expensive compared to the other solutions."

"In addition to the fact that we are more proactive in the detection of incident before they occur, we can on one click see the request path from the customer to the backend."

"From my experience with several major customers, the most valued feature of Elastic is its log analytics capabilities."

"It is scalable and supports multitenancy, which is beneficial for MSPs."

"Elastic APM has plenty of features, such as the Elastic server for Kibana and many additional plugins. It's a comprehensive tool when used as a logging platform."

"The solution allows us to dig deep into data."

"It has always been a stable solution."

More Elastic Observability pros

Cons

"A downside of Avantra is that it comes with predefined values."

"We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities."

"The dashboard needs to improve; it's not so clear right now and we need it to be more usable so we can have all of our reports in one easy-to-access place."

"The dashboard needs to improve."

"I think they can improve their UI, while very intuitive, I would like to see graphic updates."

"The machine-learning is lacking and should be improved."

"Elastic Observability could improve asset discovery as the current requirement to push the agent is not ideal."

"The solution would be better if it was capable of more automation, especially in a monitoring capacity or for the response to abnormalities."

"I am familiar with Azure Monitor, which I find more user-friendly compared to Elastic, which is a very technical tool."

"If we had some pre-defined templates for observability that we could start using right away after deploying it – instead of having to build or to change some of the dashboards – that would be helpful."

"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper."

"Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema."

"Elastic support really struggles in complex situations to resolve issues."

"The auto-discovery isn't nearly as good. That's a big portion of it. When you drop the agent onto the JVM and you're trying to figure things out, having to go through and manually do all that is cumbersome."

More Elastic Observability cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."

"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"Elastic Observability's pricing could be better for small-scale users."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

20%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The problem is their licensing model, which is a bit confusing. Many customers struggle to understand their total cost of ownership because Elastic licensing is not dependent on easy, quantifiable ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Elastic Observability?

My use case for Elastic Observability is observability, as we upload our customers' data, including logs, and when there is an issue, we can analyze what went wrong.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Avantra

Compared 11% of the time

Datadog vs Avantra

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Avantra

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Avantra

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Avantra

Compared 6% of the time

More Avantra Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs Elastic Observability

Compared 4% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 4% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 3% of the time

Datadog vs Elastic Observability

Compared 3% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avantra

September 2026

Download Avantra product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

September 2026

Download Elastic Observability product report

Overview

Avantra is an industry-leading platform designed to automate SAP operations for enterprises. It optimizes SAP landscapes, ensuring efficient performance management to meet the demands of large-scale environments while reducing manual tasks.

Avantra automates SAP operations, providing tools that enhance efficiency and reliability. It assists enterprises with advanced monitoring, performance optimization, and predictive analytics, crucial for managing complex SAP landscapes. By integrating seamlessly with SAP environments, it offers comprehensive insights and automations that lead to improved operational control and reduced manual intervention. Businesses benefit significantly by bridging IT operations with business objectives, thereby facilitating more effective resource allocation and decision-making processes.

What are the key features of Avantra?

Automated Health Checks: Conducts daily system analysis for consistent performance tracking.
Predictive Monitoring: Uses AI for early detection of potential SAP issues to prevent downtime.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers a clear view of system performance with customizable metrics.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly fits into existing workflows with robust integrations.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Automation reduces the workload on IT teams, freeing up resources.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and resource wastage, leading to cost savings.
Improved Decision Making: Real-time data insights enable better strategic planning.
Enhanced Performance: Boosts system stability and enhances user satisfaction.

Avantra is particularly beneficial in industries with heavy reliance on SAP systems, such as manufacturing and finance. It helps streamline operations, providing rapid responsiveness to market changes and regulatory requirements, ensuring that businesses remain competitive and compliant in their respective fields.

Avantra

Elastic Observability offers a comprehensive suite for log analytics, application performance monitoring, and machine learning. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Teams and Slack, enhancing data visualization and scalability for real-time insights.

Elastic Observability is designed to support production environments with features like logging, data collection, and infrastructure tracking. Centralized logging and powerful search functionalities make incident response and performance tracking efficient. Elastic APM and Kibana facilitate detailed data visualization, promoting rapid troubleshooting and effective system performance analysis. Integrated services and extensive connectivity options enhance its role in business and technical decision-making by providing actionable data insights.

What are the most important features of Elastic Observability?

Centralized Logging: Streamlines the collection, analysis, and storage of log data.
Powerful Search: Provides robust search capabilities for quick access to relevant information.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs across diverse environments.
Real-time Telemetry: Ensures up-to-date insights and monitoring.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly connects with services like Teams and Slack.
Data Visualization: Enhances visibility with Elastic APM and Kibana.

What benefits and ROI should users explore in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers significant savings through efficient data management.
Rapid Incident Response: Minimizes downtime with quick troubleshooting tools.
Comprehensive Insights: Supports better business decisions with detailed data analysis.
Performance Tracking: Enables assessment of system effectiveness and improvements.

Elastic Observability is employed across industries for critical operations, such as in finance for transaction monitoring, in healthcare for secure data management, and in technology for optimizing application performance. Its data-driven approach aids efficient event tracing, supporting diverse industry requirements.

Elastic

Sample Customers

Migros, Strauss, Migros, LAM research, Deloitte, Deloitte, Kiewit

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Buyer's Guide

Avantra vs. Elastic Observability

September 2026

Free Report: Avantra vs. Elastic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about Avantra vs. Elastic Observability and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avantra vs. Elastic Observability report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.