AWS Control Tower vs CloudAware comparison

"The advantages of AWS Control Tower that stand out for me include centralized management and easy governance control."

"It provides a central point for account management, access control, and compliance monitoring."

"It offers automated recommendations for security and policies, creating a landing zone and providing a list of policies."

"One of the standout advantages is the fine-grained control it offers in terms of permissions and privileges."

"The solution's initial setup was easy for me."

"The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on job descriptions in Active Directory. This establishes a direct correlation between the user's name, job definition, and the corresponding rules applied to each account."

"The most significant benefit of Control Tower is its capability to align with our organization's standards."

"It is incredibly user-friendly and functions seamlessly."

"I utilized it in one of the use cases for workload assessment and definitely it has brought in the value as a return of investment to us, because that was the assessment I was doing for one of our end customers."

"I utilized it in one of the use cases for workload assessment and definitely it has brought in the value as a return of investment to us, because that was the assessment I was doing for one of our end customers."

"The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations."

"It is essential to clarify that this isn't necessarily a drawback of the service, but having a clear and concise set of predefined guidelines from AWS for moving existing accounts under AWS Control Tower would be highly beneficial as it would simplify the process and make it more user-friendly."

"The sole drawback is its restriction to enable only one Control Tower."

"There should be more automation security tools in the Control Tower."

"AWS should provide more resources, examples, and tutorials."

"It would be beneficial if AWS offered the capability to seamlessly deploy your infrastructure to another region to ensure continuous availability and redundancy."

"The integration with other AWS functions has room for improvement."

"The initial setup is complex."

"I am looking forward for a positive contribution because as per the research I did so far, it is going to benefit us if we start utilizing it, but I am a little concerned of whether it will fit in all our requirements."

"I am looking forward for a positive contribution because as per the research I did so far, it is going to benefit us if we start utilizing it, but I am a little concerned of whether it will fit in all our requirements."

"It is cost-effective and the associated cost is quite minimal."

"The pricing structure is closely intertwined with the specifics of your environment and the billing strategy you employ."

"The solution is free."

"The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations."

"The pricing is efficient, not overly expensive but also not very cheap."

"It operates on a pay-as-you-go model, meaning we are charged only for the services we actively use within it."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing an eight."

"I believe it's free of charge or comes at a very low cost. It's an additional feature. Even if there is a fee, it's minimal. AWS seems to assist customers in gaining a comprehensive view of their security setups within AWS. Using Control Tower is highly recommended, especially as your company grows and involves Active Directory, various departments, and different architectural aspects. It becomes more advisable to leverage Control Tower rather than managing these aspects manually, especially for larger organizations."