CloudAware vs Snyk comparison

CloudAware and Snyk are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. CloudAware is ranked #32 with an average rating of 9.0, while Snyk is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.9. CloudAware holds a 0.4% mindshare in CM, compared to Snyk’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudAware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Snyk users who would recommend it.

CloudAware

Read 1 CloudAware review

302 Views
151 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Snyk

Read 50 Snyk reviews

20,508 Views
615 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudAware

Snyk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Snyk and CloudAware are competing in security and cloud management. Snyk has an advantage in developer-focused security tools, while CloudAware offers superior value with its sophisticated cloud management features.

Features: Snyk focuses on developer-first tools, emphasizing open-source security, quick integration, and a seamless fit within development environments. CloudAware provides asset management, compliance features, and integrations with various cloud services, making it ideal for enterprises with extensive cloud requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Snyk offers seamless integration into developer workflows with efficient customer service, appealing to developer-focused teams. CloudAware's deployment requires more effort but provides support designed for enterprise cloud infrastructures, catering to complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Snyk presents a straightforward pricing model, suitable for development teams, offering good ROI for security solutions. CloudAware's pricing caters to enterprises with extensive cloud management needs, potentially offering a higher ROI through cost optimization and compliance benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudAware

Ranking in Cloud Management

32nd

Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

26th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Snyk

Ranking in Cloud Management

11th

Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (16th), Application Security Tools (7th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), GRC (4th), Vulnerability Management (13th), Container Security (6th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (1st), Software Development Analytics (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd), AI Security (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudAware is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 2.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Snyk	2.1%
CloudAware	0.4%
Other	97.5%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2783919

Associate Vice President at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Cloud cost visibility has improved and workload assessments now support stronger business cases

I am looking forward to more workload observability. The second thing is mostly looking forward to know cost optimization and how we can be able to manage multiple hyperscaler workloads from a single platform. I am looking forward to a monitoring solution that can monitor all hyperscaler services because AWS does have their 250 plus managed services offering. We have workload running in Kubernetes, Docker, EC2, RDS. I need a single platform that will monitor all these services which are being running in the cloud platform. Customer support is good. Whenever I have interacted with them, I got the required response from them. That is pretty much good. The organizations that are looking forward and have enterprise grade workload running in their public cloud platform, I would definitely recommend them to start using CloudAware because that is going to bring in value addition for them which they might not be aware of while using by themselves.

Read full review

Abhishek-Goyal

Software Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improves security posture by actively reducing critical vulnerabilities and guiding remediation

Snyk's main features include open-source vulnerability scanning, code security, container security, infrastructure as code security, risk-based prioritization, development-first integration, continuous monitoring and alerting, automation, and remediation. The best features I appreciate are the vulnerability checking, vulnerability scanning, and code security capabilities, as Snyk scans all open-source dependencies for known vulnerabilities and helps with license compliance for open-source components. Snyk integrates into IDEs, allowing issues to be caught as they appear in the code dynamically and prioritizes risk while providing remediation advice. Snyk provides actionable remediation advice on where vulnerabilities can exist and where code security is compromised, automatically scanning everything and providing timely alerts. Snyk has positively impacted my organization by improving the security posture across all software repositories, resulting in fewer critical vulnerabilities, more confidence in overall product security, and faster security compliance for project clients. Snyk has helped reduce vulnerabilities significantly. Initially, the repository had 17 to 31 critical and high vulnerabilities, but Snyk has helped manage them down to just five vulnerabilities, which are now lower and not high or critical.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I utilized it in one of the use cases for workload assessment and definitely it has brought in the value as a return of investment to us, because that was the assessment I was doing for one of our end customers."

"Our overall security has improved. We are running fewer severities and vulnerabilities in our packages. We fixed a lot of the vulnerabilities that we didn't know were there."

"Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories, making it suitable for wide-scale deployment."

"The code scans on the source code itself were valuable."

"They evolved their maturity because they could find the vulnerabilities before the pipeline runs."

"What is valuable about Snyk is its simplicity."

"The advantage of Snyk is that Snyk automatically creates a pull request for all the findings that match or are classified according to the policy that we create. So, once we review the PR within Snyk and we approve the PR, Snyk auto-fixes the issue, which is quite interesting and which isn't there in any other product out there. So, Snyk is a step ahead in this particular area."

"The most valuable feature of Snyk is the SBOM."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"I am looking forward for a positive contribution because as per the research I did so far, it is going to benefit us if we start utilizing it, but I am a little concerned of whether it will fit in all our requirements."

"The general input I have is that there is an opportunity for them to better align with other similar tools and better align with similar capabilities that cloud suppliers deliver natively."

"Offering API access in the lower or free open-source tiers would be better. That would help our customers. If you don't have an enterprise plan, it becomes challenging to integrate with the rest of the systems. Our customers would like to have some open-source integrations in the next release."

"The documentation sometimes is not relevant. It does not cover the latest updates, scanning, and configurations. The documentation for some things is wrong and does not cover some configuration scannings for the multiple project settings."

"They were a couple of issues which happened because Snyk lacked some documentation on the integration side. Snyk is lacking a lot of documentation, and I would like to see them improve this. This is where we struggle a bit. For example, if something breaks, we can't figure out how to fix that issue. It may be a very simple thing, but because we don't have the proper documentation around an issue, it takes us a bit longer."

"The solution's integration with JFrog Artifactory could be improved."

"Snyk has several limitations, including issues with Gradle, NPM, and Xcode, and trouble with AutoPR."

"Technically, we have better vulnerabilities detection in Checkmarx and Veracode. Both of them are more precise about vulnerabilities detection."

"Scalability has some issues because we have a lot of code and its use is mandatory. Therefore, it can be slow at times, especially because there are a lot of projects and reporting. Some UI improvements could help with this."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Despite Snyk's coverage, scalability, reliability, and stability, it is available at a very competitive price."

"Snyk is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The price of the solution is expensive compared to other solutions."

"The license model is based on the number of contributing developers. Snyk is expensive, for a startup company will most likely use the community edition, while larger companies will buy the licensed version. The price of Snyk is more than other SLA tools."

"We do have some missing licenses issues, especially with non-SPDX compliant one, but we expect this to be fixed soon"

"For what Snyk offers, it has the best cost-benefit I have ever seen because you're buying the license per user."

"We are using the open-source version for the scans."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudAware?

That is pretty much good. I found it quite reasonable from the cost perspective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudAware?

I am not exactly using CloudAware. I am looking forward to know about what CloudAware is doing. I need some cost optimization solution for a workload running in AWS. I want better dashboards and al...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudAware?

We have almost 1 million of ARR workload running in AWS which includes 100 to 200 virtual machines as EC2 and RDS. We are struggling to map what exactly the cost optimization strategy we need to fo...

See all answers

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs CloudAware

Compared 59% of the time

AWS Control Tower vs CloudAware

Compared 41% of the time

More CloudAware Competitors

SonarQube vs Snyk

Compared 16% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 5% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 4% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 3% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs Snyk

Compared 3% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

January 2026

Download CloudAware product report

Buyer's Guide

Snyk

January 2026

Download Snyk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Fugue, Snyk AppRisk

Overview

CloudAware offers robust cloud management solutions, enabling efficient infrastructure monitoring, cost optimization, and compliance adherence across various platforms. Users appreciate its CMDB for resource tracking, automated security protocols, and enhanced cost management features, which collectively enhance operational efficiency and foster better team collaboration.

CloudAware

Snyk excels in integrating security within the development lifecycle, providing teams with an AI Trust Platform that combines speed with security efficiency, ensuring robust AI application development.

Snyk empowers developers with AI-ready engines offering broad coverage, accuracy, and speed essential for modern development. With AI-powered visibility and security, Snyk allows proactive threat prevention and swift threat remediation. The platform supports shifts toward LLM engineering and AI code analysis, enhancing security and development productivity. Snyk collaborates with GenAI coding assistants for improved productivity and AI application threat management. Platform extensibility supports evolving standards with API access and native integrations, ensuring comprehensive and seamless security embedding in development tools.

What are Snyk's standout features?

Simplicity and Integration: Easy to integrate across platforms like GitLab, GitHub, and Jira.
Comprehensive Vulnerability Database: Offers accurate reporting for effective vulnerability management.
Developer-Friendly Design: Supports multiple programming languages, appealing to developers.
Automation and Flexibility: Enhances workflow efficiency with automated capabilities.

What benefits can users expect?

Efficiency in Vulnerability Detection: Streamlines prioritization and remediation processes.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a competitive pricing model compared to alternatives.
Enhanced Workflow: Integration with DevOps tools improves development processes.

Industries leverage Snyk for security in CI/CD pipelines by automating checks for dependency vulnerabilities and managing open-source licenses. Its Docker and Kubernetes scanning capabilities enhance container security, supporting a proactive security approach. Integrations with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps optimize implementation across diverse software environments.

Snyk

Sample Customers

Sony, AOL, Thomson Reuters, Pearson

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors and best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.