AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Microsoft is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.2% mindshare in PSP, compared to Microsoft’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Read 12 AWS Elastic Beanstalk reviews

1,763 Views
1,763 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Read 11 Azure Red Hat OpenShift reviews

1,373 Views
1,277 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Azure Red Hat OpenShift and AWS Elastic Beanstalk are both competitive offerings in the cloud environment space, distinguished by unique deployment and management features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift demonstrates an advantage in scalability and support, while AWS Elastic Beanstalk is notable for its automation capabilities, attracting developers who prioritize streamlined management.

Features: Azure Red Hat OpenShift is highly valued for its robust Kubernetes integrations, automated CI/CD pipelines, and enterprise-grade application focus. It provides a comprehensive platform with high-level integrations that simplify cloud operations. In contrast, AWS Elastic Beanstalk stands out with its dynamic scaling, seamless AWS service deployment options, and excellent monitoring and logging tools, emphasizing simplicity and speed for developers.

Room for Improvement: Azure Red Hat OpenShift might improve by addressing its high initial setup costs and enhancing user-friendliness for non-enterprise customers. Additionally, reducing complexity in integrations could benefit various users. AWS Elastic Beanstalk could improve by expanding integration capabilities beyond AWS solutions, offering more customization for advanced users, and enhancing support for larger-scale enterprise applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers a straightforward deployment process, leveraging deep integrations within the AWS infrastructure that facilitate rapid scaling and provisioning. Its focus is on automation which generally results in faster deployment times. Azure Red Hat OpenShift, conversely, emphasizes containerized application deployment with support across multiple cloud platforms, ensuring greater flexibility and customization. Both platforms offer high-quality customer service, but Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides specialized support with expertise in Kubernetes environments.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Red Hat OpenShift incurs higher initial setup costs due to its robust feature set and customizability, which can lead to substantial ROI for businesses seeking advanced scalability and Kubernetes management capabilities. Meanwhile, AWS Elastic Beanstalk supports a lower entry-level cost model, utilizing AWS resources efficiently. It appeals primarily to startups and smaller-scale applications by providing a quick ROI thanks to its rapid development support.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Beanstalk is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Red Hat OpenShift is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Elastic Beanstalk	1.2%
Azure Red Hat OpenShift	1.2%
Other	97.6%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Kunal Das

Test Engineer at Happiest Minds Technologies

Quick automation has simplified my app deployments and has let me focus on data engineering

The overall experience with AWS Elastic Beanstalk was excellent. The performance made deploying and managing my application very easy, and it was really smooth and efficient. The automatic scaling can be improved so it can handle traffic changes more smoothly. I have given a rating of nine out of ten because auto scaling works reliably and it handles traffic spikes well with minimal manual effort needed. There is a balance between simplicity and control. I have not given a ten out of ten because sometimes the scaling decision can feel slightly delayed depending on the metrics. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is powerful, but not as advantageous or granular as ECS or EKS auto-scaling. Customization is good but not fully flexible for complex architectures.

Read full review

DeepakMishra

CEO, Head of Sales and Business Development at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Integrated cloud platform has streamlined app delivery and supported certified marketplace products

A potential area for improvement for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is to see managed identity support and ensure that some of the security features are not conflicting with Azure or Azure product features. I am sure in the future it will be more templatized so that we need not depend on Azure security features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift should be independent of Azure security features with respect to container scan and all that. Why would it use an Azure security feature? That is what I find. It is still yet to be GA and commonly available, but that is a strong reason for improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would rate the overall solution a ten out of ten."

"AWS Elastic Beanstalk helps improve my efficiency, saves time, and streamlines application hosting in the cloud."

"One of the most valuable aspects is that developers can access logs directly. They can download them from the AWS console within Elastic Beanstalk."

"Elastic Beanstalk is helpful and easy to manage services, even when dealing with multiple clients."

"The feature I like most about Elastic Beanstalk is the way I do not have to do anything, just deploy my app."

"The most valuable feature of Elastic Beanstalk is its ease of use and management."

"Elastic Beanstalk, based on my experience and recommendations from friends, is a good solution."

"There is nothing that makes me frustrated while using AWS Elastic Beanstalk, and I would definitely recommend AWS Elastic Beanstalk to others as it is perfect for quick deployment with minimal infrastructure overhead."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk pros

"The solution's support and its automation tool that ensures we are secure and appropriately configured are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."

"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."

"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"Flexibility, a very well-developed interface, and ease of learning are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."

"Technical support from Red Hat is very good."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift pros

Cons

"The automatic scaling can be improved so it can handle traffic changes more smoothly."

"The documentation needs to be clearer, particularly relating to editing JSON files before uploading applications."

"Sometimes there are issues when auto-scaling with CloudFront."

"Elastic Beanstalk can enhance its customizability further, especially in terms of deployment options."

"AWS Elastic Beanstalk could improve its auto-scaling feature to better detect potential AI-based attacks or misuses that could lead to unexpected costs."

"There are areas for improvement in Elastic Beanstalk, especially in the management part. Tasks like creating load balancers and retiring versions require manual code updates, and URL changes can be time-consuming."

"Sometimes it is difficult to use for the first time. The automatic scaling functionality could use improvement."

"One area where AWS Elastic Beanstalk struggles is with the complexity of deployments. As deployments become more complex, technical constraints can become a burden."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk cons

"Regarding room for improvement, there's always room, but it's mainly about Azure itself rather than Azure Red Hat OpenShift. Azure is not as advanced as AWS in terms of supported services. AWS is the leader in this area. However, there's no need for service improvement in Azure Red Hat OpenShift as the service is excellent. I don't need additional features because I can customize it according to the customer's needs."

"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."

"The product is expensive."

"I would rate the technical support from Microsoft as six."

"They need to improve the core licensing model."

"Automation could be improved."

"Technically, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is fine. However, its marketing could be improved, especially when compared to the robust marketing efforts of Azure, HPE, and Nutanix."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."

"It is expensive compared to a similar product."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

18%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

My experience with AWS Elastic Beanstalk regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good compared to other services.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

I was using AWS Elastic Beanstalk to deploy my application and to learn data engineering concepts. I used AWS Elastic Beanstalk to test how to change data from raw to useful cases. In that way, I u...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The pricing for OpenShift is similar to other solutions like Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) Studio. The plans with ARO and AWS are standard in the market. However, using OpenShift on-pre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

My use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is for an employee engagement application and HR, and I have also used it for an agentic bot.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon Lightsail vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 15% of the time

Google App Engine vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 11% of the time

Heroku vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 10% of the time

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 18% of the time

Google Cloud vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon EKS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 2% of the time

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

September 2026

Download AWS Elastic Beanstalk product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

September 2026

Download Azure Red Hat OpenShift product report

Overview

AWS Elastic Beanstalk streamlines deploying and managing web applications, providing efficient session management, direct log access, and seamless rollback during deployment for uninterrupted operations.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is designed for developers seeking ease of use in provisioning and deployment without any application downtime. With auto-scaling capabilities that enhance application performance, users can deploy directly on EC2 or Dockerized environments. While it supports a range of application frameworks, improvements in integration with CloudFront, auto-scaling against AI-based attacks, and simplified HTTPS integrations are suggested by users. Additionally, expanding Docker support and enhancing documentation can address user challenges, offering a more comprehensive experience.

What features make AWS Elastic Beanstalk efficient?

Direct Log Access: Easily retrieve logs through the console for efficient monitoring.
Session Management: Manages sessions between Elastic Beanstalk and RDS smoothly.
Auto-Scaling: Enhances performance by adjusting resources automatically.
Versioning: Allows application changes without downtime, boosting flexibility.

What benefits do users find in AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

Continuous Operation: Seamless rollbacks ensure website functionality during deployments.
Ease of Use: Simplifies the provisioning of applications and environmental configurations.
Flexibility: Offers versatile framework support, catering to different application needs.
Integration: Facilitates integration with services like S3 and LoadBalancer for efficient management.

Organizations adopt AWS Elastic Beanstalk for deploying web applications such as Django, Laravel, native PHP, and .NET Core. They leverage its management capabilities for environmental configurations like Python virtual environments and PHP-FPM. It's a practical tool for educators and businesses managing client migrations, utilizing its seamless integration with AWS services.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides enterprises with enhanced cloud-native flexibility and supports efficient multi-cloud migrations, simplifying infrastructure management, security, and patching.

Enterprises find Azure Red Hat OpenShift valuable for its advanced GUI, service mesh, automatic scaling, and integration capabilities. It aids regulatory compliance and streamlines application development with its DevOps integration, reducing release cycle times. The platform is appreciated for scalability, accessibility, and resilience. Users highlight its straightforward configuration, though improvements in the licensing model, cost-effectiveness, CLI, and support for data-intensive applications are needed. Orchestration, compatibility with new frameworks, and Azure dependency are areas for refinement. Built-in CI/CD tools are preferred over third-party solutions.

What are the key features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

Advanced GUI: Intuitive interface for streamlined management.
Service Mesh: Simplifies microservices management.
Automatic Scaling: Efficiently manages resources to meet demand.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with enterprise systems.
DevOps: Reduces release cycle time with unique integration.

Why consider Azure Red Hat OpenShift for your enterprise?

Cloud-Native Flexibility: Enhances adaptability for applications.
Security and Compliance: Aids in regulatory adherence.
Infrastructure Management: Simplifies with automation.
Scalability and Resilience: Handles workloads efficiently.

Businesses deploy Azure Red Hat OpenShift for pipeline management, containerized applications, and cloud migration. It supports banking operations, corporate integrations, and digital business development. Enterprises use it for Apache deployment in cloud platforms, advised by consultants transitioning from Broadcom to OpenShift.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift

September 2026

Free Report: AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.