Axonius vs Tenable Lumin comparison

Axonius and Tenable are both solutions in the IT Vendor Risk Management category. Axonius is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4, while Tenable is ranked #19. Axonius holds a 1.5% mindshare in IVRM, compared to Tenable’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axonius users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Axonius

Read 8 Axonius reviews

2,627 Views
158 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable Lumin

Read 3 Tenable Lumin reviews

317 Views
317 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Axonius

Tenable Lumin

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Axonius and Tenable Lumin compete in the cybersecurity asset and vulnerability management category. Axonius offers seamless integration and asset visibility, while Tenable Lumin provides advanced threat prioritization and holistic risk assessment.

Features: Axonius integrates with a wide range of IT and security solutions, improving asset visibility and management. It offers cross-platform synchronization and an extensive integration framework, ideal for organizations focused on seamless connectivity. Tenable Lumin excels at translating vulnerability data into insights, providing strong risk prioritization and comprehensive risk assessment. Its strength lies in proactive threat management, appealing to those needing detailed risk analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axonius offers straightforward deployment with quick integration, catering to organizations seeking rapid setup. It ensures a faster onboarding process compared to Tenable Lumin, which may require more deployment time. However, Tenable Lumin supports users with strong customer service and post-implementation assistance, excelling in ongoing support.

Pricing and ROI: Axonius typically provides a more cost-effective setup, with potential for high ROI due to its integration capabilities and asset visibility. Organizations prioritizing lower initial costs may prefer Axonius. Tenable Lumin may require a higher initial investment but justifies this with its advanced risk management features like risk prioritization, catering to those valuing long-term sophisticated solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Axonius vs. Tenable Lumin Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Tenable Lumin

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axonius

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (2nd)

Tenable Lumin

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of Axonius is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Lumin is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Axonius	1.5%
Tenable Lumin	1.8%
Other	96.7%

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

Sakkemgari Tamagari

Director of cloud security at Nuxeo

Centralized asset tracking has transformed governance and now speeds incident response

I would add that currently, the tool supports some integrations, but we would expect it to support broader integration with other security tools, observability, or any other cloud integrations. One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved. The user interface needs improvement because it is a bit laggy sometimes, making it not straightforward when we want to identify things quickly, leading us to go in different directions which could be better tied together in one place.

Read full review

Yusuf-Hashmi

Sr. Director - Group Head - IT Security (CISO) at Jubilant Organosys Ltd., India, Leading Chemical M

It creates a risk score that helps me develop a remediation plan, so the infrastructure team can move quickly to address risks

Tenable Lumin's dashboard helps me understand my vulnerabilities and which tasks I should prioritize for vulnerability remediation. Tenable creates a risk score that helps me develop a remediation plan, so the infrastructure team can move quickly to address risks. Real-time threat intelligence is also helpful. They get multiple sources of intelligence and correlate the data. Lumin discovers your assets through an agent or a network scan. That's an excellent feature that I'm leveraging now to better understand where all my assets are.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"With this solution in place, we are now 100% compliant along with security functions or operations area management."

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"Tenable Lumin is very good because it helps organizations look for solutions and profit. It also helps organizations save time because it displays market data well."

"Tenable Lumin's dashboard helps me understand my vulnerabilities and which tasks I should prioritize for vulnerability remediation. Tenable creates a risk score that helps me develop a remediation plan, so the infrastructure team can move quickly to address risks. Real-time threat intelligence is also helpful. They get multiple sources of intelligence and correlate the data. Lumin discovers your assets through an agent or a network scan. That's an excellent feature that I'm leveraging now to better understand where all my assets are."

"The stability of this solution is appropriate. You can sleep well at night, if you have this solution implemented in your environment."

Cons

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

"One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved."

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"The solution's cloud operation has issues Lumin and Tenable are not one product. The integration needs to be worked out better. There is space for improvement there."

"The price could be better."

"Tenable Lumin isn't that old and still needs some time to mature."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"The price could be better."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

I think I am good so far with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing; I do not see any disturbances there, but it is working well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

My main use case for Axonius is config management and asset inventory. I use Axonius to maintain the asset inventory up to date and also to identify the owners quickly; these are the primary requir...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 27% of the time

ServiceNow vs Axonius

Compared 12% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 10% of the time

runZero vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

Ivanti Asset Manager vs Axonius

Compared 2% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

Bitsight vs Tenable Lumin

Compared 30% of the time

RSA Archer vs Tenable Lumin

Compared 19% of the time

Black Kite vs Tenable Lumin

Compared 18% of the time

More Tenable Lumin Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

January 2026

Download Axonius product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Vendor Risk Management

January 2026

Download Tenable Lumin product report

Also Known As

No data available

Lumin

Overview

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

Calculate, communicate and compare your cyber exposure while managing risk with Tenable Lumin.

For the first time ever, you can visualize and explore your Cyber Exposure, track risk reduction over time, and benchmark against your peers.

Use Tenable Lumin, an advanced visualization, analytics and measurement solution, to understand and reduce your Cyber Exposure. Lumin transforms vulnerability data into meaningful insights to help you manage cyber risk across your entire organization.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Tenable Lumin

December 2025

Free Report: Axonius vs. Tenable Lumin

Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius vs. Tenable Lumin and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axonius vs. Tenable Lumin report.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.