

Azure Bastion and Centreon are prominent in the network monitoring domain. Centreon appears to have the upper hand for device monitoring due to its flexibility and integration, whereas Azure Bastion has stronger security features.
Features: Centreon offers a comprehensive monitoring platform with scalability and integration of third-party solutions. It provides anomaly detection and custom dashboards. Azure Bastion focuses on secure resource access, role-based access control, and virtual machine management.
Room for Improvement: Centreon lacks robust cloud monitoring and has challenges in downtime configuration and API ease of use. More comprehensive cloud integration is needed. Azure Bastion could benefit from improved AI features, better data transfer between desktops, and enhanced browser compatibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon is primarily used on-premises, and support varies, with business hours coverage limited to Central Europe. Azure Bastion, being cloud-based, offers efficient technical support but needs improved documentation and issue-specific communication.
Pricing and ROI: Centreon, an open-source solution, is cost-effective for large-scale monitoring. It faces issues with licensing increments. Azure Bastion, despite higher initial costs, aligns with security needs but might be costly for smaller companies due to its user-based pricing model.
We have seen a clear return on investment from Azure Bastion, mainly in operational efficiency and reduced infrastructure overhead.
We have noticed savings of approximately twenty percent by using Azure Bastion compared to VM pricing.
Centreon provides timesaving and costsaving benefits as it lets us manage multiple devices on a single platform.
It significantly saves time by automating monitoring tasks and reduces costs as it requires fewer resources.
One thing I would highlight is the response time of the engineers and the expertise they have, which is very valuable.
We usually get backup within two hours.
Support is satisfactory but with room for improvement, primarily concerning data transfer issues.
We do not have direct access to Centreon's technical support.
If issues arise, like services appearing as down in Centreon, technical support helps check the polar-server communication.
Technical support from Centreon responds within 24 hours and resolves issues quickly.
It is designed to provide access over a private network without hitting the internet.
It scales well across multiple subscriptions and virtual networks without requiring separate jump host infrastructure per environment.
Occasionally, for several hours, we do not receive any alerts, causing a business impact.
We use other tools for adding and deploying configured devices, but direct access from Centreon would be beneficial.
Azure Bastion is stable.
Sometimes we do not receive alerts, causing business impact, and users ask why no alerts were received.
Centreon is a much more straightforward and stable tool compared to Icinga.
We would appreciate more advanced session recording, centralized audit reporting, and tighter integration with SIEM or SOC workflows to improve privileged access monitoring and forensic investigations.
I would like to see integrated AI features with Azure Bastion, especially for connectivity issues.
A storage solution must be created to transfer data, and this requires additional permissions like ACL or NFS.
Enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks.
Reliability is sometimes an issue. Centreon has a developer mode and production mode, but sometimes alerts don't come through in production mode.
While Centreon excels at server-level monitoring, it lacks the ability to track web app availability and latency, unlike Dynatrace, which is efficient in this area.
Microsoft's pricing is on the higher side and could be more competitive.
The price is not necessarily cheaper, but it is acceptable.
Centreon's pricing is not very expensive.
Browser-based RDP or SSH through Azure Bastion has reduced operational overhead because administrators can securely access VMs without VPN dependency, jump servers, or exposed management ports.
The most valuable feature of Azure Bastion is its security, which I find to be the best part.
The security is the main reason we use Azure Bastion because it is integrated with Azure Active Directory, ensuring that access is secure.
Monitoring is a fundamental pillar of technical support, and Centreon streamlines this process, reducing the need for extensive manual checks.
Centreon's real-time monitoring, despite having some manual aspects, supports us in managing our operations effectively.
Centreon allows us to monitor all of our devices on one platform.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Centreon | 1.3% |
| Azure Bastion | 0.4% |
| Other | 98.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Azure Bastion offers secure, browser-based access to Azure virtual machines, eliminating the need for public IPs by integrating Azure Active Directory and role-based access control for efficient and secure management.
Azure Bastion provides a robust security layer for virtual machine access, leveraging Azure Active Directory for authentication while eliminating the need for traditional Jump servers. It streamlines permissions through role-based access control, enhancing administrative efficiency. Users value its capability to quickly provision VMs and utilize SSL tunneling for secure browser access, all while highlighting the interface's ease of use and stability. Azure Bastion is designed for companies of all sizes, effectively protecting virtual machine access within Azure environments.
What are the most important features of Azure Bastion?Companies in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology frequently implement Azure Bastion to secure sensitive data and simplify remote management of IT resources. By facilitating internal connections to Azure virtual machines, they reduce risks associated with public network exposure, emphasizing security and legal compliance. Organizations benefit from Azure Bastion by efficiently managing IT setups that require stringent security protocols, such as remote desktop connections, ensuring their operations are both scalable and secure.
Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.
Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.
What are Centreon's standout features?Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.