

Centreon and Azure Bastion compete in the IT infrastructure management category, focusing on monitoring and remote access respectively. Azure Bastion has an upper hand in security features whereas Centreon provides superior performance analytics.
Features: Centreon offers detailed performance analytics, customizable dashboards, and alerting capabilities to quickly identify and address IT issues. Azure Bastion provides secure remote access through RDP and SSH connections, eliminates the need for VPNs, and ensures seamless connectivity to virtual environments.
Room for Improvement: Centreon could improve by simplifying its integration process with diverse IT systems, enhancing its interface design for better user experience, and expanding its automation capabilities. Azure Bastion could enhance its feature set by offering more comprehensive network monitoring, improving usability with non-Azure environments, and adding advanced logging features for better traceability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon's deployment requires detailed configuration to integrate with existing IT setups, offering support channels for assistance. Azure Bastion provides a simpler deployment process as a cloud-native solution within Azure, reducing complexity with its integration across the Azure ecosystem, which also facilitates more streamlined customer service management.
Pricing and ROI: Centreon involves initial setup costs and potential maintenance expenses, yielding good ROI by improving network efficiency and minimizing downtime. Azure Bastion utilizes Azure's pay-as-you-go model, offering cost efficiency by lowering infrastructure and security overheads with evident ROI in enhanced security management.
We have noticed savings of approximately twenty percent by using Azure Bastion compared to VM pricing.
Centreon provides timesaving and costsaving benefits as it lets us manage multiple devices on a single platform.
It significantly saves time by automating monitoring tasks and reduces costs as it requires fewer resources.
Support is satisfactory but with room for improvement, primarily concerning data transfer issues.
We usually get backup within two hours.
We do not have direct access to Centreon's technical support.
If issues arise, like services appearing as down in Centreon, technical support helps check the polar-server communication.
Technical support from Centreon responds within 24 hours and resolves issues quickly.
It is designed to provide access over a private network without hitting the internet.
Occasionally, for several hours, we do not receive any alerts, causing a business impact.
We use other tools for adding and deploying configured devices, but direct access from Centreon would be beneficial.
Azure Bastion is stable.
Centreon is a much more straightforward and stable tool compared to Icinga.
Sometimes we do not receive alerts, causing business impact, and users ask why no alerts were received.
A storage solution must be created to transfer data, and this requires additional permissions like ACL or NFS.
I would like to see integrated AI features with Azure Bastion, especially for connectivity issues.
It would be nice to have the capability to cut and paste across desktops, similar to old-fashioned Remote Desktop emulation.
Enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks.
Reliability is sometimes an issue. Centreon has a developer mode and production mode, but sometimes alerts don't come through in production mode.
While Centreon excels at server-level monitoring, it lacks the ability to track web app availability and latency, unlike Dynatrace, which is efficient in this area.
Microsoft's pricing is on the higher side and could be more competitive.
The price is not necessarily cheaper, but it is acceptable.
Centreon's pricing is not very expensive.
It offers a secure platform to access resources over a private network without hitting the internet.
The most valuable feature of Azure Bastion is its security, which I find to be the best part.
The security is the main reason we use Azure Bastion because it is integrated with Azure Active Directory, ensuring that access is secure.
Centreon's real-time monitoring, despite having some manual aspects, supports us in managing our operations effectively.
Monitoring is a fundamental pillar of technical support, and Centreon streamlines this process, reducing the need for extensive manual checks.
Centreon allows us to monitor all of our devices on one platform.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Centreon | 1.4% |
| Azure Bastion | 0.4% |
| Other | 98.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Azure Bastion offers secure, browser-based access to Azure virtual machines, eliminating the need for public IPs by integrating Azure Active Directory and role-based access control for efficient and secure management.
Azure Bastion provides a robust security layer for virtual machine access, leveraging Azure Active Directory for authentication while eliminating the need for traditional Jump servers. It streamlines permissions through role-based access control, enhancing administrative efficiency. Users value its capability to quickly provision VMs and utilize SSL tunneling for secure browser access, all while highlighting the interface's ease of use and stability. Azure Bastion is designed for companies of all sizes, effectively protecting virtual machine access within Azure environments.
What are the most important features of Azure Bastion?Companies in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology frequently implement Azure Bastion to secure sensitive data and simplify remote management of IT resources. By facilitating internal connections to Azure virtual machines, they reduce risks associated with public network exposure, emphasizing security and legal compliance. Organizations benefit from Azure Bastion by efficiently managing IT setups that require stringent security protocols, such as remote desktop connections, ensuring their operations are both scalable and secure.
Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.
Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.
What are Centreon's standout features?Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.