Bacula Enterprise vs Cohesity Data Cloud comparison

Bacula Systems and Cohesity are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Bacula Systems is ranked #24 with an average rating of 10.0, while Cohesity is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5. Bacula Systems holds a 1.1% mindshare in BRS, compared to Cohesity’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cohesity users who would recommend it.

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

3,340 Views
1,904 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Cohesity Data Cloud

Read 13 Cohesity Data Cloud reviews

2,518 Views
1,586 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

Cohesity Data Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Bacula Enterprise and Cohesity Data Cloud are two prominent data management solutions. While Bacula Enterprise is favored for its pricing and support, Cohesity Data Cloud is considered to offer better overall value due to its extensive features.

Features: Bacula Enterprise users highlight its robust backup capabilities, flexibility in deployment options, and lower setup costs. Cohesity Data Cloud is praised for its comprehensive data protection, secondary storage capabilities, and cloud integration, making Cohesity more feature-rich.

Room for Improvement:Bacula Enterprise users suggest enhancements in reporting tools, cloud integration, and a need for a more intuitive UI. Cohesity Data Cloud users mention the need for better pricing models, improved data migration tools, and quicker support response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Bacula Enterprise is reported to have a straightforward deployment and reliable customer support. Cohesity Data Cloud also offers easy deployment but receives higher praise for customer service quality. Cohesity's superior customer engagement adds to its appeal.

Pricing and ROI:Bacula Enterprise is noted for lower setup costs and an appealing ROI. Cohesity Data Cloud, while more expensive, is seen as a valuable investment due to its rich feature set and quick ROI. The higher cost of Cohesity is justified by its broader offering.

To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Data Cloud Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Data Cloud

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

24th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

16th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cohesity Data Cloud

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

19th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Management Platforms (DMP) (6th), AI Data Analysis (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cohesity Data Cloud is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cohesity Data Cloud	0.9%
Bacula Enterprise	1.1%
Other	98.0%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar

Analista Tecnologia Banco de Dados at Centro de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação

Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression

It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It could include greater transparency regarding the volume of data trafficked on the network, as well as the expectation of deduplication. A more practical strategy could come with a backup policy model as a suggestion for both large and small companies. A simple suggestion is to visually implement the backup time as far as your physical media.

Read full review

Mounir ElMously

Senior Manager Advisory Services at Optimum Online (Cablevision Systems)

Has provided strong data protection and unified access while streamlining backup operations

Cohesity Data Cloud is not unique in this area. There are a couple of other vendors who are playing in the same area. They provide some sort of isolation for the protected data that makes it very difficult, almost impossible to tamper with once it is stored on the platform. One of the major issues of ransomware attacks is that they happen in the background and it is too late after being hit. Giving a hard time for bad actors to access the data provides more immunity for your data from ransomware attacks. All organizations are very interested in as-a-service model where they do not pay upfront costs, but only get the services and pay for what they use. Converting from CapEx to OpEx is the ultimate goal for any financial manager in any organization. The model uses some sort of object storage for the backup data and contents, which gives a better level of safety than the traditional file system because normally the object storage is not subject to alteration. The only concern I have with cloud implementation is that if you have a presence on-premises, trying to use the cloud may become a performance challenge. It is a perfect situation for workloads that live in the cloud. The way I design things is we should not send data across the WAN to the cloud if it is a large volume that could potentially affect performance. A cloud solution is ideal for a cloud workload from Cohesity Data Cloud perspective. It is best to have some sort of local presence of a repository to do the backup using LAN performance. Then we can always send or upload the data to the cloud without impacting the actual backup window. Support for additional platforms and the option to do multi-tier performance would be beneficial. For example, if I have three types of workloads - SAP database, Oracle database, and SQL database - each with different backup window requirements, the ability to tier performance to meet these specific needs would be perfect for the actual workload and meeting the availability requirements of each application domain. The general perception is if it is not broken, do not fix it. In most cases, organizations do not see value for security until they are hit with something bad. With ever-increasing threats and risks of ransomware and data theft, the problem is becoming more obvious. Looking at what is happening in the market and seeing organizations being hit by security threats, the level of loss of services and client dissatisfaction makes security investment worthwhile. There is no real tangible ROI for security, but considering the potential of losing data forever or having it exposed unnecessarily to the market, it is worth the investment. The bad actors and risks are always reinventing themselves, so we must reinvent our security posture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."

"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."

"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."

"The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."

"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

"It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"Bacula is pretty stable."

"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."

"It has excellent integration for virtualization, which means we can easily protect VMs, virtual machines, which consists mainly of snapshot backups that are quite easy to recover."

"Cohesity Data Cloud comes with a different flavor where they provide global deduplication across multiple platforms, which provides a tremendous return on investment from a storage perspective because if you have a segment that can be deduplicated in one box and you have multiple boxes, you cannot repeat the deduplication function across different hardware."

"My favorite feature of Cohesity Data Cloud is the setup, as it is very fast compared to other solutions; I have worked in different clouds, and Cohesity Data Cloud stands out as superior."

"I find the most important feature to be data protection."

"The hyper-converged architecture and scalability are hugely important for growing service companies."

"Our data center size occupancy for Cohesity appliance is reduced by 70% when we installed Cohesity."

"The clone feature is very nice. You can restore workloads onto Cohesity's storage, which is also nice to have when you don't have enough space to restore on the server."

"Cohesity Data Cloud is user-friendly, and anyone can use this tool; the support is really good, especially the web support, and the dashboard and everything are good."

More Cohesity Data Cloud pros

Cons

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

"A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed."

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"Easier setup and configuration, perhaps including a GUI, would be an improvement."

"Sometimes the support team does not provide proper assistance during critical issues from the cloud end."

"It has never been touted as a tier-one storage platform, and that would be a benefit. They are currently working on solving that issue."

"There is limited support for legacy systems, which is something that could be improved."

"In terms of functionality, Helios has been effective, but sometimes it doesn't show the exact cluster name for backups."

"The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions."

"The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth."

"The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions."

"They still have quite some way to go for improving their agents."

More Cohesity Data Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution."

"We have a perpetual license."

"Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out."

"Regarding pricing, it's very costly and I rate it a four."

"It's priced properly for the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

University

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohesity DataPlatform?

All organizations are very interested in as-a-service model where they do not pay upfront cost, but they only get the services and pay for what they use as they use it. Converting from CapEx to OpE...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cohesity Imanis Data?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cohesity Imanis Data?

I have been in a relationship with Cohesity Data Cloud for more than five years now. I have used Helios in the past.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 19% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

Clumio vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Rubrik vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Cohesity Data Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

February 2026

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Cohesity Data Cloud

March 2026

Download Cohesity Data Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Imanis Data, DataPlatform, Cohesity Helios

Overview

Bacula Enterprise is a highly scalable, especially robust and secure data backup and recovery software. Its unique low cost subscription model empowers data centers to truly escape data volume price traps. With a high degree of flexibility and customizability, Bacula offers native integration with a wide range of hypervisors, databases, file systems, cloud interfaces and containers. High numbers of enterprise organizations worldwide (incl. NASA, Bank of Austria, Swisscom or Sky PLC) have adopted Bacula Enterprise backup software in mission critical environments because of its advanced features and ability to handle high data volume at very low cost.

Bacula Systems

Consolidate your backups, file shares, object stores and data for dev/test and analytics on a web-scale data management platform.

Cohesity

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

Navis, 1st Security Bank, Brown University, WestLotto

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Data Cloud

March 2026

Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Data Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Data Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Data Cloud report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.