Beta Systems GARANCY IAM Suite vs Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security comparison

"It has allowed us to have a central system for handling security profiles for all users on different target systems e.g. Oracle, Unix, and Active Directory."

"Integration between our departments has been the most valuable."

"A good feature that is present is MAM or Mobile Application Management. We can deploy this feature on the device, which is not managed by the organization. If I apply some security configuration on a personal device, the user would be really disappointed. What we do instead is that we give all access to the applications related to corporate and ask the users to use the application. We secure the application by putting the security features on the applications and not on the users' devices. This way, the users are happy, and we also meet our company's compliance standards. Then, everyone is happy."

"The best advantage of the product is that it provides an all-in-one solution."

"The solution is scalable."

"Microsoft Mobility and EMS include Intune for Mobility, which provides mobile device management and mobile application management. With mobile device management, you can control the entire device in an organization."

"I am very happy with it currently."

"The solution offers excellent documentation that is easily available online."

"Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is a basic part of all of our projects because it's a very important basis for any customer wanting to set up Microsoft technology, as they need to manage all users and devices on a security basis."

"This product launches a request to add or remove accesses on different target systems but it doesn't check that the access granted was previously requested."

"Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is expensive."

"Sometimes the application gets hung or restarts multiple times in the background, consuming battery life."

"The licensing can be messy at times."

"Its performance needs enhancement."

"The technical support from Microsoft could be better."

"The MDM part of the engine could be better."

"There are certain shortcomings in the licensing model of the product where improvements are required."

"The auditing and reporting could be updated and upgraded. I would like to see light applications because they consume a lot of the device's memory at present."

"The increase in the prices of the product might not be the actual problem, but things become complex with some new plans that were introduced by Microsoft recently."

"I would rate pricing at eight out of ten. It is a bit higher because of the security features that Microsoft provides."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"We have to pay 10 dollars per user. I would rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."