BigPanda vs xMatters comparison

BigPanda and Everbridge are both solutions in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category. BigPanda is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3, while Everbridge is ranked #12. BigPanda holds a 2.6% mindshare in IMS, compared to Everbridge’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BigPanda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Everbridge users who would recommend it.

BigPanda

Read 20 BigPanda reviews

3,994 Views
919 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

xMatters

Read 31 xMatters reviews

2,427 Views
2,136 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

BigPanda

xMatters

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

BigPanda and xMatters are both designed to enhance IT operations and incident management. BigPanda shines with its advanced analytics, while xMatters offers a comprehensive automation toolkit and may provide more value with its broader feature set.

Features: BigPanda distinguishes itself with AI-driven incident response, real-time analytics for root cause analysis, and a focus on incident context. xMatters excels in automation and integration, providing seamless connectivity across diverse platforms and expansive workflow automation.

Room for Improvement: BigPanda can enhance its deployment flexibility and simplify systems integration to improve user experience. Additionally, BigPanda might consider expanding its feature set to better compete with xMatters. xMatters could focus on refining its user interface for ease of use, improving customization options, and enhancing documentation to support complex configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: xMatters benefits from a flexible deployment model that fits easily into various IT environments, supported by strong documentation and customer service. BigPanda offers reliable customer support, but deployment demands a detailed understanding of systems integration.

Pricing and ROI: BigPanda may involve higher initial costs but offers substantial ROI through efficient incident resolution. xMatters provides competitive pricing with ROI driven by operational savings from its automation efficiencies. While BigPanda focuses on analytics for returns, xMatters provides cost-effective solutions enhancing ROI via automation.

To learn more, read our detailed BigPanda vs. xMatters Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BigPanda vs. xMatters

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BigPanda

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (22nd), AIOps (9th)

xMatters

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category, the mindshare of BigPanda is 2.6%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of xMatters is 4.8%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Alerting and Incident Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BigPanda	2.6%
xMatters	4.8%
Other	92.6%

IT Alerting and Incident Management

Featured Reviews

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Automated incident workflows have reduced alert noise and now improve response efficiency

In my opinion, the best feature of BigPanda is its speed in terms of deployment. It has very strong integration with all of the major platforms and workflows that organizations need. The biggest customers are enterprises like HSBC and Barclays. Implementing something effective for them that dramatically reduces meantime to repair and the number of incidents is substantially difficult, as projects can often extend three years with very small results. BigPanda is different; it is a tool relied on by many enterprises, fitting over existing toolsets rather than trying to replace them, which makes it non-competitive to many existing alerts and monitoring tools. It enhances existing systems to provide actionable intelligence for business solutions.

Read full review

Dean-Robinson

Sr. Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees

A versatile solution with excellent logging capabilities that reduced our time to resolve

The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes. There are a couple of improvements that xMatters could make to the incident hub, where we can manage high-priority incidents. More sharing capability between collaborating incident managers would be good to see, including the ability to whiteboard. That would allow them to share and sketch out ideas while looking for a solution. Those two features are essential, and that's why we want to use the solution in conjunction with Everbridge because xMatters doesn't have them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most useful feature has been the AI/ML, and the way BigPanda uses the AI/ML is good compared to other SRE tools."

"The most valuable feature is the dashboard."

"The program is very stable."

"The features of BigPanda that have most improved my incident response times include AIOps, correlation pieces, and grouping, which is a big win for us."

"BigPanda is different; it is a tool relied on by many enterprises, fitting over existing toolsets rather than trying to replace them, which makes it non-competitive to many existing alerts and monitoring tools."

"Overall, I rate BigPanda as a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable features of BigPanda are the API integration was good. It enables us to do faster onboarding."

"BigPanda simplifies the process by consolidating multiple monitoring platforms into a single console where I can view all issues."

More BigPanda pros

"The support is probably my favorite thing about xMatters."

"Its ease of use and self-service are important to me. It's very easy for users to go in and modify their own contact information, for managers to go in and manage their own on-call rotations and shifts."

"By adding the ServiceNow integration, we have been able to page support groups for critical incidents and move scheduling from ServiceNow into xMatters, offering more control to our support groups."

"This has made it much easier to send notifications to a group or individual, as you just need to know the name and the message to send."

"Made it very easy to implement our roster of people who receive alarms with the REST API."

"We have reduced the time it takes to resolve major incidents through xMatters’s conference bridge management solution."

"If you really want to reduce your mean time for restoring a service during a major incident, xMatters would definitely be the right tool."

"This automation of incident notification processes has immensely affected our ability to respond to incidents."

More xMatters pros

Cons

"The UI for this solution could be improved. It is very hard to find what you are looking for."

"We had to use a partner for the deployment."

"Analytics is an area for improvement, being able to break down the actions that are being taken by users of BigPanda, as well as the auto-magical work that is being done by BigPanda."

"Our infrastructure is quite large - tens of thousands of servers, often with 30-plus checks running on each host with one minute intervals. This generates a lot of data often in bursts (when we have a large scale failure), and this has caused some delay in the ingestion pipeline."

"It would be beneficial for BigPanda to offer detailed error descriptions similar to what AppDynamics and ThousandEyes provide."

"BigPanda can improve the correlations. We didn't see any big value. It is still good at the same event deduplication, event processing, and ticket creation, but I was more looking at event analysis and event correlation. In that area, it is still no big difference between the other solutions on the market. All of them, are in the same immature stage."

"In terms of product stability, I can rate it around nine. It is quite good, though I would not rate it a full ten because every time there is a new feature, I have to go through documents or contact support."

"I am not sure if we can pull reports of bulk incidents in different formats like PDF, Excel, or CSV. This feature would allow us to extract monthly incident reports similar to ServiceNow."

More BigPanda cons

"The user interface could be more intuitive. When you are not familiar with integrations and you're starting fresh, looking for where to begin, it is a bit daunting and not as clear as it could be."

"A lot of the issues that we've had have already been addressed. However, they could be clearer with the actual throughput and the costs. The throughput that we signed up for was a lot lower than what we needed, and we had to pay a lot more to get the throughput that we needed."

"Beyond the typical grouping, xMatters has what is referred to as dynamic teams. Dynamic teams are criteria for setting up and targeting a group of people that meet specific criteria. The bad thing about this setup is that you cannot alter those criteria through the typical xMatters import/export process. The attributes that create the criteria for dynamic teams can only be altered via the Web UI. So, if you want to create a new dynamic team in a mature xMatters environment (one that is already populated with hundreds of users), and you want to add, say, 100 users to that dynamic team, you have to do it manually."

"From a scheduling standpoint, this is actually causing more work than what we had with Excel spreadsheets."

"When you are not using the conference bridge from xMatters and you are using an external one, it is a little bit hard to get the person whom xMatters calls to jump directly to the external bridge. They need to hang up the phone and then get to the email to get the URL so that they can jump on the bridge. There is no direct connection from xMatters to that external bridge, but I understand that part of the business."

"We would like to see the ability to support custom devices. We have a lot of users who use Slack, which is another tool for communication. xMatters currently does not support Slack as a communication method. It can't send events to Slack and respond to them."

"Every time that I say, "I need extra licenses to make sure that all Level 1 and 2s have their own xMatters account," they keep telling me that it is too expensive."

"While the documentation is good, the knowledge base - the collection of user supported community forums - is a little weak compared to some of the other products I've used. If I have a problem that I can't find the answer to in the documentation, there are very few places to go after that, because the user base, the community forums, are not strong for me to find someone who's had the same issue as me, and find out what the answer to their problem was. That's somewhat of a weak point."

More xMatters cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of BigPanda is in the middle compared to other solutions."

"They were great to work with on pricing/licensing. Given we are a high-growth company, we needed a flexible site license."

"BigPanda is cheaper than the competitors."

"We pay $200,000 USD per year."

"The pricing is too high... we procured 150 licenses and we have almost 1,500 users in IT. We had to come up with a few ideas for determining which users get a license and which users don't need one. Due to the limitation of the number of licenses, we were unable to integrate the user profiles with Active Directory."

"I don't make the decisions on the cost aspect. We haven't had any complaints. I think it has a reasonable price."

"There's a significant difference between a full license, which allows people to respond to and acknowledge receipt of messages, and a more scaled-down license, which just allows people to see the notification. So we need to evaluate what license they need when onboarding new users because the full license is significantly more expensive."

"It feels like good value in the sense that the service is excellent. The people above me who look at such things have renewed it a couple of times, and I think they would have thought whether it was good value, whether it was wildly overpriced, or whether there were better and cheaper alternatives. So, from that perspective, the pricing is fair and proper."

"The cost depends very much on the company's size and usage. We're a very high use case compared to many companies, so we had to consider licensing costs carefully. If we added all our users, that would be 30,000, and that's no good; we wouldn't have been able to afford it. For example, we had to put in customization to sync across on-call users. For the license per user, the price is very reasonable and comparable to ServiceNow when factoring in everything that needs to get up and running."

"I would definitely say it's worth the value. I wouldn't say it's expensive, but most people who pick xMatters are not going to select xMatters based on price. There are other lower-priced competitors that are out there. But I would say for what we're getting, it's worth the money."

"If you are willing to pay for the licensing of it, it is able to scale out."

"I'm not really involved with the cost standpoint. I've only heard rumors of how much it costs, and if it costs what I think it costs, its cost is very high as compared to a lot of other tools that we're using here. It seems on the higher end from a cost standpoint."

More xMatters pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BigPanda?

Regarding extra expenses, I pay more for communication and do not incur costs for another dashboard perspective, but there are indirect costs related to managing open-source products, leading to re...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BigPanda?

Something that comes to mind regarding improvements is communication, as I rely heavily on another tool. If BigPanda could provide communication capabilities beyond just sending notifications—such ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs BigPanda

Compared 11% of the time

Moogsoft vs BigPanda

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs BigPanda

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs BigPanda

Compared 5% of the time

ServiceNow vs BigPanda

Compared 5% of the time

More BigPanda Competitors

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs xMatters

Compared 27% of the time

Opsgenie vs xMatters

Compared 19% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs xMatters

Compared 19% of the time

FireHydrant vs xMatters

Compared 10% of the time

FortiMonitor vs xMatters

Compared 2% of the time

More xMatters Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BigPanda

June 2026

Download BigPanda product report

Buyer's Guide

xMatters

May 2026

Download xMatters product report

Also Known As

No data available

xMatters IT Management

Overview

BigPanda enhances incident management through root cause analysis, alert deduplication, and event correlation. The AI-driven platform is designed for environments with high alert volumes, providing insights for data-driven decisions and seamless integration with tools like ServiceNow and Teams.

BigPanda addresses the complexities of incident management by offering an AI-focused approach to anomaly detection. Automation improves response times, while unified analytics supports informed decision-making. Despite AI integration and usability needing enhancement, the platform simplifies observability and ticketing through integrations with New Relic and Slack. Features like enrichment mapping and unified search improve functionality, though reporting and visualization aspects require development.

What are the key features of BigPanda?

Root Cause Analysis: Efficient identification of the sources of incidents.
Alert Deduplication: Reduces alert noise by consolidating duplicates.
Event Correlation: Connects related alerts for easier incident management.
Automation: Streamlines processes for faster response times.
Seamless Integration: Connects with tools like ServiceNow and Teams.

What benefits or ROI can users find in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Automates incident management tasks.
Operational Insights: Provides valuable analytics for strategic decisions.
Improved Collaboration: Integrates notifications with Slack and other platforms.
Reduced Alert Fatigue: Deduplication and suppression improve focus on critical issues.

BigPanda is widely implemented in industries focusing on observability and predictive analysis, providing efficient alert processing and incident management. Users utilize its capabilities to seamlessly integrate with solutions like Dynatrace, particularly in environments that handle high volumes of alerts, ensuring effective notification delivery through various platforms.

BigPanda

xMatters provides robust automated notifications and incident management, enhancing alerting and critical IT incident handling with seamless integrations, ensuring timely communications.

xMatters is designed for efficient incident management and streamlined IT alerting. It offers flexibility through integrations with ServiceNow, Slack, and others, enhancing communication and workflow management during critical events. Users highlight the SaaS model, customizable on-call scheduling, and effective communication tools. These features reduce incident response times, enhance message delivery, and support team collaboration across platforms.

What features make xMatters stand out?

REST API Automation: Facilitates seamless integration and automation.
Intuitive UI: Simplifies the user experience for managing workflows.
Workflow Builder: Enhances customization for incident processes.
Integration Flexibility: Supports various tools like ServiceNow and Slack.
Customizable Scheduling: Offers tailored on-call schedules and escalation paths.
Automated Notifications: Streamlines incident response times.
Robust Logging: Ensures reliability in tracking system activities.
Device Management: Offers comprehensive control over notification devices.
Self-Service Capabilities: Empowers users in managing their alerts and settings.
Conference Bridging: Facilitates communication during incident resolution.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced by seamless integrations.
Improved Incident Response: Driven by automated notification and escalation pathways.
User Empowerment: Through self-service and device management features.
Accessibility: Enabled by a SaaS-based infrastructure.
Collaboration: Boosted through messaging and conference features.

xMatters supports industries in managing IT incidents and emergency notifications. Teams prioritize alerts, maintain on-call schedules, and automate response workflows, particularly integrating with tools like ServiceNow for critical event handling. Its application in infrastructure monitoring and proactive engagement is notable across sectors.

Everbridge

Sample Customers

Nagios, ServiceNow, ITSM, NOC, CMDB Evolved, RemedyIncident Management Process

Over 2.7 million users trust xMatters daily at successful startups and global giants including athenahealth, BMC Software, Box, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Experian, NVIDIA, ViaSat and Vodafone. xMatters is headquartered in San Ramon, California and has offices worldwide. Visit our website to see how business like yours found solutions with xMatters.

Buyer's Guide

BigPanda vs. xMatters

June 2026

Free Report: BigPanda vs. xMatters

Find out what your peers are saying about BigPanda vs. xMatters and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BigPanda vs. xMatters report.

See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.