Blackberry UEM vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management comparison

BlackBerry and Ivanti are both solutions in the Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) category. BlackBerry is ranked #21, while Ivanti is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. Additionally, 100% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Blackberry UEM and Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management compete in endpoint management, with Blackberry offering better pricing and support, while Ivanti provides superior features.

Features: Blackberry UEM focuses on security with strong encryption, offers comprehensive compliance capabilities, and provides centralized management for various devices. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management includes advanced automation features, proactive threat detection, and emphasizes threat intelligence integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Blackberry UEM offers straightforward deployment and exceptional customer support, which is beneficial for organizations needing hands-on assistance. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management has a complex deployment process due to its advanced capabilities and offers comprehensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Blackberry UEM has a lower setup cost, attractive for budget-conscious buyers looking for immediate value. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management requires a larger upfront investment but is seen as delivering substantial long-term ROI through its extensive features and operational efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

reviewer2247477

Administrator at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

An affordable solution to control BlackBerry applications but has latency issues

The solution is complicated for new users. There are a lot of buttons on the first page. It can be very confusing if you’re not aware of the terms they use. For example, a button labelled ‘edit device’ doesn't explain exactly what it does or how to use it. Setup is difficult, time-consuming, and a lot of procedures are involved. There are latency issues on the application.

Read full review

Domenico Pochiero

Senior Product Leader, Sqs at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally

In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is more efficient to have one solution rather than having security parts spread across three, four, or five solutions."

"The standout features of Intune are its excellent mobile device management and highly effective application management capabilities."

"The dashboards, the security, and the customization capabilities work very well for us."

"Technical support is good."

"Microsoft Intune has positively impacted my organization by providing many benefits."

"The features I found most valuable in Intune are its user visibility and troubleshooting options."

"The stability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten."

"The compliance and configuration policies in Microsoft Intune are the most valuable features, saving significant time compared to manual implementation."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"The solution has a lot of features, such as adding different applications and devices to one platform. This allowed us to manage many devices and applications from a single platform."

"This product helps us to create a streamlined process and it is working as expected."

"Ivanti's unified platform for IT and security operations helps streamline processes, especially because the manual intervention of having to constantly monitor, update, and maintain endpoints and applications has significantly reduced by leveraging Ivanti Neurons for UEM."

"The technical support from Ivanti is good."

"By moving to Intune, they were able to save the complete cost for Ivanti Neurons for UEM and put it towards something they were already paying for, and additionally they improved enrollment deployment time significantly and now can deploy laptops in an hour and even give the task to end users."

"AI-powered automation and self-healing are additional features that automatically fix common issues and reduce manual work."

"We have very good technical support; when we had big issues, the support was fantastic, I have nothing to complain about, and it was important for us to have that level of security from the company."

"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."

"Its features are very complete."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management pros

Cons

"In my opinion, Microsoft Intune has room for improvement. The pricing could be a little better, and the reporting could be a little better as well."

"One major concern I have is user friction. When you enforce many policies and people log into apps like Microsoft Teams or Outlook, they encounter numerous MFA and other policies."

"Microsoft Intune lacks the ability to provide seamless remote assistance or remote control."

"Microsoft Intune could be improved with a more intuitive user interface, simpler policy configuration for complex environments, and faster troubleshooting tools."

"I have one remark about the application management for the Android version. Often, the Play Store opens and leaves the possibility to download to the user, which is not good."

"We've faced significant pushback with Copilot as our clients aren't seeing a favorable cost-benefit analysis."

"If you wish to block any App Store application, there is no way to do so."

"We faced issues with macOS support. The product should have better inventory and asset management."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"The solution is complicated for new users. There are a lot of buttons on the first page. It can be very confusing if you’re not aware of the terms they use. For example, a button labelled ‘edit device’ doesn't explain exactly what it does or how to use it."

"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."

"The biggest problem that I have with technical support is that it is not regional and we are dealing with time differences."

"I also found the UI to be quite complicated to work with, so it takes quite a bit of time to train any new staff and to get them to understand how the solution works."

"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release."

"I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."

"The biggest improvement I would like to see in Ivanti Neurons for UEM is a more intuitive interface with simpler navigation for common tasks."

"The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that."

"From my perspective of having just moved away from the product, I would probably give it a six."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate Intune an eight out of ten for affordability. It's bundled with the 365 licensing, which is competitive overall."

"My team members bundled it together with their Microsoft solutions, including Microsoft 365 and related products."

"It's monthly for us, but it's built into the license cost that we pay our IT each month. It's maybe 129 Kroner per head, which translates to £10. There are some additional costs. Our IT had to set up and configure their own server, so there is an extra cost for that, but I'm not sure what that costs."

"Microsoft's licensing is more flexible and adaptive than its competitors."

"Our enterprise agreement includes Microsoft Intune at no additional cost."

"There are licenses required for this solution. We enable licenses on the devices we need to manage."

"If you're subscribing to Premium or E3, there are no additional costs for Intune, it's included."

"Based on the features that it gives, it is cost-efficient. It is not necessarily on the expensive side of the scale. It provides a hefty number of features that any organization would want. It is in a good price range."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."

"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"The solution is affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

13%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	192
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	186

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	17

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

Regarding pricing, I would say Ivanti Neurons for UEM falls at a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

The price being quite high and the limited container storage are areas that have room for improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

I use Ivanti Neurons for UEM for mobile device management, and I can describe the use case. The remote device managem...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 11% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

AWS Systems Manager vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 1% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Workspace ONE UEM vs Blackberry UEM

Compared 21% of the time

More Blackberry UEM Competitors

ProcessUnity vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Software Risk Manager ASPM vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

July 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

July 2026

Download Blackberry UEM product report

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

July 2026

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management report

Download Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

No data available

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Microsoft

Demo not available

BlackBerry

Ivanti

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Blackberry UEM provides enterprises with robust management for mobile devices, apps, and content, catering to security-focused organizations. It offers comprehensive support for a range of devices and operating systems, ensuring seamless management and secure connectivity for enterprise users.

Blackberry UEM facilitates secure and efficient enterprise mobility management by integrating with a variety of devices across multiple platforms, including iOS, Android, and Windows. Designed for businesses concerned with critical security needs, it enables IT departments to distribute apps, secure data, and authenticate users with ease. By streamlining device management, Blackberry UEM reduces complexity and enhances productivity through efficient IT resource use, making it essential in numerous sectors.

What are the most important features of Blackberry UEM?

Multi-Platform Support: Provides unified management for iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS.
Secure Connectivity: Ensures data protection with high-grade encryption and compliance.
App Management: Allows for seamless deployment and management of enterprise apps.
Data Containerization: Keeps corporate data organized and secure on devices.
Policy Enforcement: Implements security policies that meet enterprise requirements.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in Blackberry UEM reviews?

Enhanced Security: Blackberry UEM strengthens defenses against unauthorized access.
Increased Productivity: Efficient device management leads to better resource allocation.
Cost Efficiency: Centralized control reduces operational expenses and IT burden.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing business needs and user demands.

In sectors such as healthcare, finance, and government, where security and compliance are critical, Blackberry UEM provides vital solutions. It's implemented to ensure confidentiality and integrity in managing sensitive information. By leveraging secure connectivity and versatile device management, these industries enhance operational efficiency while maintaining stringent security protocols.

BlackBerry

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.

What are the most important features?

AI-powered Automation: Reduces manual work through intelligent automation.
Centralized Management: Unified control of devices from a single interface.
Real-time Visibility: Instant access to device status and operations.
Efficient Patch Management: Prioritizes and automates patch deployments.
Neurons Bots: Automates complex IT processes, enhancing efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Time Savings: Automation reduces manual task duration significantly.
Improved Compliance: Ensures security protocol adherence with ease.
Streamlined Operations: Centralized management simplifies IT workflows.
Enhanced Security: Effective patch management reduces vulnerability risks.
Device Health Monitoring: Supports continuous oversight of device status.

In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Information Not Available

Frontier Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ManageEngine, Omnissa and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM). Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.

We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.