Boomi iPaaS vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

The compared Boomi and SAP solutions aren't in the same category. Boomi is ranked #6 in PaaS , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 11.6% mindshare in the category. SAP is ranked #2 in BBM , with an average rating of 7.9, and holds a 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Boomi iPaaS

Read 29 Boomi iPaaS reviews

3,778 Views
1,813 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 35 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

3,393 Views
1,391 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Boomi iPaaS

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (6th)

SAP Process Orchestration

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. Boomi iPaaS is designed for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) and holds a mindshare of 11.6%, up 7.6% compared to last year.
SAP Process Orchestration, on the other hand, focuses on Business-to-Business Middleware, holds 7.1% mindshare, down 11.5% since last year.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Integration solution proves maturity and drives productivity

There are many features we're using. We're starting to do AI now regarding integration with other platforms, focusing on creating integrations. A significant area for improvement is version control. Currently, you develop and cannot properly roll back to a previous version unless you create different versions. With proper version control, you could know which version to revert to and test other versions.

Read full review

Vasanth Kumar Sabaapathi

Senior Lead Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Simplified integrations bring flexibility and efficiency to diverse industries through comprehensive features and robust support

SAP is already trying to make improvements for SAP Process Orchestration by releasing updates every quarter, including patches and modules, and from a security standpoint, while it's a tightly coupled tool, they are introducing a lot of enhancements aligned with current market trends. There are standard contents readily available for starting integrations, which suit around 90% of every industry across verticals including pharma, manufacturing, and employee data central with SuccessFactors integration. Regarding functionality-wise improvements in SAP Process Orchestration, they are now incorporating the Salesforce system. Previously, we needed to rely on a third-party adapter for integration within SAP, but now they are building their own adapters to connect with Salesforce. Additionally, there are options like data connectors using Ariba coming up with SAP Process Orchestration. There's much more to explore, especially as they release new patches, enhancements, and adapters each quarter.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."

"The integration landscape has become complex, and having a data strategy with unified data models would make integration easier for any platform, including Boomi."

"It has been a stable product."

"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."

"It is easy to learn and implement."

"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."

"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."

"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."

More Boomi iPaaS pros

"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Orchestration is beneficial for us."

"The solution is stable."

"Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."

"The solution's technical support is good."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"There should be more scripting possibilities."

"The product's UI could be more convenient."

"Although Boomi iPaaS is top in the market, there might be room for improvement in the ETL aspect, which was recently integrated as another module. This aspect of Boomi iPaaS is not mature enough at the moment."

"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."

"Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios."

"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."

"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."

More Boomi iPaaS cons

"SAP Process Orchestration breaks down sometimes."

"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."

"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."

"The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates."

"There are two main areas for improvement: performance and cost."

"Some configurations can be a little tricky."

"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously."

"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."

"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"

"They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."

"This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."

"Approximately 20k annually."

"There could be an easy-to-understand licensing model."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"AtomSphere Integration's pricing is competitive, and I would rate it seven out of ten."

More Boomi iPaaS pricing and cost advice

"The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."

"We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable."

"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"The pricing depends on what type of client you are with SAP and the contract you have. There is a licensing cost that needs to be paid."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"The pricing for this solution is fine."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Non Profit

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year. It is affordable even for small customers, like a salon with a couple of branches.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios.

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The price for SAP Process Orchestration is a little high when compared to market trends, which is just how the business is. I would rate it an eight.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 18% of the time

webMethods.io vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 8% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 8% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 5% of the time

More Boomi iPaaS Competitors

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 11% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS

August 2025

Download Boomi iPaaS product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

July 2025

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

Boomi

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Overview

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

Boomi

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

July 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.