Brocade ADX [EOL] vs HAProxy comparison

Read 48 HAProxy reviews

8,206 Views
5,334 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Brocade ADX [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Brocade ADX [EOL] and HAProxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC).

To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Brocade ADX [EOL]

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HAProxy

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (2nd), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (12th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (6th), Bot Management (6th), Service Mesh (3rd)

Featured Reviews

it_user735237

Sr Technology Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Makes local load balancing relatively simple but could use more options for L7 load balancing

L7 load balancing features like URL re-write, persistence, etc. Also some of the global load balancing features like sticky, sticky-sync, etc Organization has a lot of client facing applications and needs to have multiple servers for scalability. With ADX network load balancer, local load…

Read full review

Shrinivas Devarkonda

Head of DevOps at TripFactory

Handles high traffic efficiently and simplifies complex routing with rule-based logic

I think HAProxy is good as it stands now, but I believe there could be improvements. gRPC has recently been implemented, which is great, along with TLS 1.2 and 1.3 support, and HTTP 2.0 is also available. However, I'm unsure about the benchmark of those HTTP 2.0 requests on HAProxy. If there were any other protocol with better performance than HTTP 2.0, or perhaps mTLS and other similar features, including that in HAProxy would be really great. For improvements, I think that during setup and configuration, the steps provided are neat and clear. Anyone can easily install and configure it. There are many kernel tuning parameters also available, which is great. For specific improvement, in terms of logging, I think printing the full object of the request may help, or if there's a way to reference two requests, it would be beneficial to find a complete session history from a logged-in customer, as it would help analyze customer and user analytics.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ADX is better in capacity and its chassis-based product (10K) is much more scalable."

"With centralized SSL termination and automated renewals now in place, that time requirement has dropped to nearly zero hours, translating to dozens of hours saved per year."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that it works for my use case of application load balancing. I'm using it for PeerSense, and it's easy enough for PeerSense."

"HAProxy has positively impacted my organization because all of my applications are now centralized in one point, so I can manage it from my load balancer machine."

"HAProxy's TCP load balancer is excellent and super stable."

"It reduced the load on our main load balancers."

"The most important features would be the load-balancing of HTTP and TCP requests, according to multiple LB-algorithms (busyness, weighted-busyness, round robin, traffic, etc). Another important feature that we cannot live without is the username/passwd authentication for legacy systems that had none."

"HAProxy has positively impacted my organization by making it easier for me to manage configurations; I put configuration files on the Ceph storage shared across the whole cluster, allowing me to write my configuration, change it easily in one place, and reload it."

"I estimate that this product has saved our company hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars in possible downtime from previous load balancers. We make a lot of our money from online sales, so it is critical to have 99.9% uptime."

More HAProxy pros

Cons

"Should have more options for L7 load balancing. Also, troubleshooting is a little difficult with this product."

"The basic clustering is not usable in our very specific setup."

"The basic clustering is not usable in our very specific setup. The clustering is mainly a configuration replication and is great in a case of active-passive usage. In the case of an active-active (or with more than two nodes) where the configuration is not fully identical, it cannot be used as-is."

"I would improve the web-based UI, but it’s a matter of personal preference."

"The solution has bad performance issues."

"The solution's dashboards and reports could be improved."

"I'm unsure about the benchmark of those HTTP 2.0 requests on HAProxy."

"The solution can be improved by controlling TCP behavior better and mandating to clients what the expected outcome must be in order to avoid receiving contestant timeout logs."

"The only area that I can see needing improvement is the management interface, since it is pretty much all through the CLI or configuration. A GUI/web interface could be helpful for users who are not as experienced in the Linux shell. However, HAProxy does have another product that we evaluated called ALOHA, which has a web front-end, but we found it did not meet our needs."

More HAProxy cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The licensing fee for the solution is $690 per unit annually."

"Test/lab virtual machines can be installed without a licence. They can't be used for performance testing but otherwise behave like production nodes."

"We use NGINX as well. However, because the health checks are a paid feature, I like to avoid it whenever possible."

"The only cost is for the image manager, who is responsible for uploading the image, and that is trivial."

"HAProxy is a free open-source solution."

"HAProxy is free software. There are optional paid products (support/appliances)."

"HAProxy is an open-source solution."

"We are using HAProxy as an open-source."

More HAProxy pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Do you recommend HAProxy?

I do recommend HAProxy for more simple applications or for companies with a low budget, since HAProxy is a free, open-source product. HAProxy is also a good choice for someone looking for a stable ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HAProxy?

Since we used the open-source version, we were not concerned about pricing, setup cost, or licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HAProxy?

For the limited use that I have of HAProxy, I don't have any points to improve. I think I need more time with this tool, or perhaps I simply don't have areas that need to get better. I don't have a...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetScaler vs Brocade ADX [EOL]

Compared 29% of the time

LoadBalancer Enterprise vs Brocade ADX [EOL]

Compared 29% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Brocade ADX [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Radware Alteon vs Brocade ADX [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More Brocade ADX [EOL] Competitors

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs HAProxy

Compared 9% of the time

NGINX Plus vs HAProxy

Compared 9% of the time

NetScaler vs HAProxy

Compared 8% of the time

Kemp LoadMaster vs HAProxy

Compared 7% of the time

LoadBalancer Enterprise vs HAProxy

Compared 6% of the time

More HAProxy Competitors

Product Reports

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Download Brocade ADX [EOL] product report

Download HAProxy product report

Also Known As

ADX

HAProxy Community Edition, HAProxy Enterprise Edition, HAPEE

Overview

Brocade ADX Series, used by service provider networks and large enterprise data centers, provides a comprehensive application delivery portfolio. All Brocade ADX platforms run the same software and support the same features. In addition, the base model for all Brocade ADX platforms can be upgraded via two software licenses - a Premium feature license and an SSL license. The Brocade ADX family of application delivery switches includes: Brocade ADX 1000 Series, Brocade ADX 4000 Series and Brocade ADX 10000 Series.

HCLSoftware

HAProxy delivers reliability, high performance, and efficient load balancing solutions. Its open-source model ensures cost-effectiveness and scalability, ideal for managing extensive infrastructure demands with minimal latency while offering seamless integration with modern platforms.

HAProxy is renowned for its robust performance in load balancing across TCP and HTTP protocols, featuring multiple algorithms such as round-robin. Users appreciate its customizable configuration and seamless SSL termination, which make it an excellent choice for managing complex infrastructures. The platform's open-source nature supports scalability, reducing costs while providing flexible proxy operations. HAProxy efficiently handles high concurrency, enabling smooth traffic management and ensuring stability within diverse systems.

What key features does HAProxy offer?

Load Balancing: Balances TCP and HTTP traffic using algorithms like round-robin
SSL Termination: Provides secure, seamless SSL termination for user connections
Customizable Configuration: Offers detailed configuration options for tailored setups
Traffic Management: Comprehensive management of large traffic loads
Open-Source: Cost-effective, scalable solution for tech infrastructures

What benefits and ROI aspects should you consider?

Reliability: High performance with minimal latency, enhancing user satisfaction
Scalability: Open-source model ensures growth without considerable cost
Integration: Compatible with Docker, Kubernetes, and cloud services
Stability: Robust architecture supports complex infrastructures smoothly

HAProxy is extensively used in load balancing implementations across various sectors. Companies deploy it for managing high traffic, Layer 4 and Layer 7 applications, and SQL databases. It supports microservices architecture, performs SSL offloading, and manages email services like SMTP. As a reverse proxy, HAProxy delivers high availability for systems like Redis, RabbitMQ, and Apache while integrating with Docker and Kubernetes. Its features enhance web application firewall capabilities and traffic routing, making it suitable for industries demanding reliable and efficient network management.

Sample Customers

Fusebill, Niagra Falls Bridge Commission, Medien System Partner

Booking.com, GitHub, Reddit, StackOverflow, Tumblr, Vimeo, Yelp

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)