Brocade ADX [EOL] vs Radware Alteon comparison

Why PeerSpot?

HCLSoftware and Radware are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. Additionally, 100% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Radware users who would recommend it.

Brocade ADX [EOL]

Read 1 Brocade ADX [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

Radware Alteon

Read 48 Radware Alteon reviews

6,998 Views
3,849 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Brocade ADX [EOL]

Radware Alteon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2025

Brocade ADX [EOL] and Radware Alteon are competing in the load balancing segment. Radware Alteon holds the upper hand due to its superior feature set, making it worth the higher cost.

Features: Brocade ADX [EOL] focuses on basic load balancing, scalability, and integration capabilities. Radware Alteon offers advanced features like SSL offloading, intelligent traffic management, and extensive security options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Brocade ADX [EOL] enjoys straightforward deployment and reliable support, ensuring hassle-free setup. Radware Alteon demands more resources for initial deployment due to its complexity but offers extensive customer service for seamless integration and system optimization.

Pricing and ROI: Brocade ADX [EOL] usually presents a lower setup cost, achieving quicker ROI for budget-conscious organizations. Radware Alteon, requiring a higher upfront investment, provides a greater ROI over time owing to its robust capabilities and security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Brocade ADX [EOL]

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Radware Alteon

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (6th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (10th)

Featured Reviews

it_user735237

Sr Technology Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Makes local load balancing relatively simple but could use more options for L7 load balancing

L7 load balancing features like URL re-write, persistence, etc. Also some of the global load balancing features like sticky, sticky-sync, etc Organization has a lot of client facing applications and needs to have multiple servers for scalability. With ADX network load balancer, local load…

Read full review

RaynielBadiola

Technical Director at Secur Links

Load balancing has simplified deployments and improves application performance monitoring

I don't think of features that will make Radware Alteon better because it is already better, but to be able to compete also with other competitors, the price is something to consider. It is not actually that expensive, but for their level, there are other load balancers with the same feature, but they have a lower price, so pricing is the only point I can give. In the future, I would like to see some other security features added, such as DDoS, which is Distributed Denial of Service. Currently, it has the Web Application Firewall feature, but in the future, they can also add a DDoS feature or a more in-depth DDoS feature.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ADX is better in capacity and its chassis-based product (10K) is much more scalable."

"Technical support is very good; they respond rather quickly, we are happy with the amount of service they provide, and they are knowledgeable and responsive."

"The health status information, with its highly detailed reporting, has saved us time on troubleshooting. We have the precise information needed that helps us find different types of situations."

"The most valuable feature is the support from the engineering team."

"Whenever we look up the events, we see that the device blocks a fair amount of attempts to breach security, and we barely see incidents with legitimate users, so I assume it's a good return on investment because the device blocks threats and allows legitimate users to work correctly."

"I am finding SSL-TLS acceleration the most valuable function, with certificate management. It is easy to generate certificates and assign them to services"

"We have improved the user experience by having services available all the time, in addition to the fact that with this solution it is easier to manage from a graphical interface that is useful and intuitive, as an administrator it is important to have a clear and complete vision of the services that we operate."

"A user-friendly and reasonably priced solution."

"It is easy to expand. Our clients are enterprise-size."

More Radware Alteon pros

Cons

"Should have more options for L7 load balancing. Also, troubleshooting is a little difficult with this product."

"I would like to see the loading documentation improved."

"There are certain features I would like to see in the next release."

"Load balancing needs improvement. It needs better integration. I heard f5 works as a DNS operator which is not available in this solution. It would be better if that was implemented."

"I know they are working on it, however, I would like to see an improved community presence, similar to the one for their main competitor, F5."

"Radware should work on the vulnerabilities part. There are third-party security solutions that do the security vulnerability assessment (VA). The assessment part needs to be worked on and improved. There should be more solutions. If any issue comes up and if any vulnerability is reported, the Radware team should do an R&D on that and work on that. They should give the solution to the customer."

"A feature that I would like to see included in the next version might be a better analysis when working with crypt issues. Right now, it is very manual; you load it into Alteon and it runs. It would be interesting to see a more dynamic process."

"We are in the process of updating our version of the solution, so judging what should be improved is difficult. But in some cases, the visualization takes a while, especially for mapping issues."

"Multiple software bugs exist. Most of the time, they're issues with Radware's patching. The organization has a vulnerability and penetration team attempting to upgrade the system to version n minus one. If we have deployed the software to the n-minus-one range, the device isn't performing well because it's already in the testing version."

More Radware Alteon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The Radware team we work with always gives us the best price. As a university, our budget is limited. We need something that is the best solution but with a low or economical pricing. We are getting a better price than competitors. The shift from Barracuda to Alteon was primarily due to cost efficiency. It is very economical, and the price fits our business needs."

"It is not the priciest and it is not the cheapest. For our solution, it was right in the middle of price performance."

"The cost of Radware Alteon is mid-ranged."

"It is the best in the industry. It was better than the competition, and that is what made us go ahead with them."

"Price-wise, the solution is a reasonable one."

"It has a good price point and is more reasonable than other comparable products"

"The pricing seems reasonable to me for what the solution provides. It is within the parameters of this type of solution."

"Radware LinkProof is neither cheap nor expensive."

More Radware Alteon pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	17
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Radware AppWall?

There is room for improvement in reducing the number of false positives I receive. We could benefit from more configuration options to avoid these false positives, which can be overwhelming for a s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Radware AppWall?

We are a system integrator company in the Philippines, and we are selling Radware Alteon product. Radware Alteon is usually used for a load balancer, so either a server load balancer or a link load...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Radware AppWall?

I recommend having support directly from Radware, not through SI channels, as they handle multiple OEMs and might lack in-depth knowledge about each. Additionally, having available knowledge bases ...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetScaler vs Brocade ADX [EOL]

Compared 31% of the time

LoadBalancer Enterprise vs Brocade ADX [EOL]

Compared 28% of the time

HAProxy vs Brocade ADX [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Brocade ADX [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

More Brocade ADX [EOL] Competitors

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Radware Alteon

Compared 12% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Radware Alteon

Compared 8% of the time

NetScaler vs Radware Alteon

Compared 8% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Radware Alteon

Compared 6% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Radware Alteon

Compared 5% of the time

More Radware Alteon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

October 2026

Download Brocade ADX [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Radware Alteon

October 2026

Download Radware Alteon product report

Also Known As

ADX

Alteon, Radware AppWall

Overview

Brocade ADX Series, used by service provider networks and large enterprise data centers, provides a comprehensive application delivery portfolio. All Brocade ADX platforms run the same software and support the same features. In addition, the base model for all Brocade ADX platforms can be upgraded via two software licenses - a Premium feature license and an SSL license. The Brocade ADX family of application delivery switches includes: Brocade ADX 1000 Series, Brocade ADX 4000 Series and Brocade ADX 10000 Series.

HCLSoftware

Alteon is Radware’s application delivery and security platform for delivering and protecting applications across physical, virtual, cloud, and hybrid environments. Available as hardware, virtual appliances cloud deployment, Alteon provides local, global server and link load balancing, advanced traffic management, SSL/TLS offload and acceleration, automation, and application optimization, including HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 support.

Through Alteon Protect, organizations can combine Alteon application delivery and on-device security with Radware Cloud Application Protection services, including web application and API protection, bot management, and web DDoS protection. This provides a unified application delivery and security approach across data center and cloud environments.

Alteon supports flexible capacity and deployment through Global Elastic Licensing (GEL), which enables licensed capacity to be allocated and reallocated across supported Alteon deployments as application and infrastructure requirements change.

The platform also supports modern automation and AI-assisted operations. Alteon MCP Server enables application, DevOps, and platform teams to use natural-language intent through an MCP-compatible AI client to create supported Alteon configurations using a guided workflow that gathers required parameters, validates configuration state, and maintains human review and approval before changes are applied. Alteon also supports lifecycle automation and integration through REST APIs, Ansible, Terraform, and Kubernetes/cloud-native environments.

Together, these capabilities enable organizations to deliver, scale, automate, and protect applications consistently across data centers, private clouds, public clouds, and hybrid environments.

Alteon supports flexible perpetual and subscription-based licensing models. Physical appliance pricing is based on the selected Alteon hardware platform and enabled performance/capacity, while virtual and cloud deployments can be licensed according to the required capacity as a subscription. Global Elastic Licensing (GEL) provides additional flexibility by allowing licensed capacity to be allocated and redistributed across supported Alteon physical, virtual, and cloud deployments rather than tying all capacity permanently to an individual instance.

Customers can also purchase application delivery together with cloud-delivered application protection through Alteon Protect, providing a combined subscription model for Alteon application delivery and Radware Cloud Application Protection capabilities.

Radware

Sample Customers

Fusebill, Niagra Falls Bridge Commission, Medien System Partner

Convergys

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.