No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Brocade ADX [EOL] vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) comparison

Why PeerSpot?
HCLSoftware and F5 are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. Additionally, 100% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of F5 users who would recommend it.
Brocade ADX [EOL]
Read 1 Brocade ADX [EOL] review
    100% willing to recommend
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...
    Read 124 F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reviews
    • 14,944 Views
    • 9,415 Comparison Views
    83% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Brocade ADX [EOL] and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC).

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: October 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    October 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Brocade ADX [EOL]
    Average Rating
    7.0
    Number of Reviews
    1
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.8
    Number of Reviews
    124
    Ranking in other categories
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (1st)
     

    Featured Reviews

    it_user735237 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user735237
    Sr Technology Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
    Makes local load balancing relatively simple but could use more options for L7 load balancing
    L7 load balancing features like URL re-write, persistence, etc. Also some of the global load balancing features like sticky, sticky-sync, etc Organization has a lot of client facing applications and needs to have multiple servers for scalability. With ADX network load balancer, local load…
    Read full review
    edshyaa - PeerSpot reviewer
    edshyaa
    Network Engineer at Stryker
    Load balancing has improved traffic distribution and currently supports high availability upgrades
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) offers effective load balancing methods that help distribute traffic across our servers, whether we have two or several. This load balancing feature stands out as it is the fundamental work we do with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). While I recognize there are many features, such as iRules, which I have not explored yet, we primarily work on VIPs, pool members, and traffic distribution. The load balancing algorithms' flexibility makes them very useful for our team, enabling us to choose different servers and manage load effectively. We use various methods based on user or application requirements, making the algorithms set up by F5 in the backend quite helpful. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) positively impacts our organization primarily through its load balancing capabilities. We avoid traffic overload on individual servers by placing backend servers behind F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) VIP. This load balancing helps us manage traffic effectively. Since the configuration of the I-series, we have had smooth performance, and with the recent migration to the R-series, it is working faster than before, providing positive outcomes for our operations. Since moving to the R-series, I notice improved performance; it is user-friendly and handles traffic efficiently. The upgrading process is different as we create tenants and a main host. R-series has better CPU and memory, leading to higher throughput with minimal downtime, making it a significant improvement over the I-series.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "ADX is better in capacity and its chassis-based product (10K) is much more scalable."
    "F5 BIG-IP is used with good applications and functions as an application firewall with additional features. We will not use any feature or any service unless there is a business case and there is a need for implementation."
    "As a pure network engineer, I think the box is performing very well."
    "The capability is at a seven or eight out of ten."
    "It is an easy way to build application policies (graphical)."
    "The support from F5 BIG-IP LTM is good."
    "We like the capability to combine the content switching with the intrusion prevention and adding the security roles, so we can expose certain sub-pieces outside without exposing everything."
    "ASM for WAF."
    "F5 has scaled very well."
    More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) pros
     

    Cons

    "Should have more options for L7 load balancing. Also, troubleshooting is a little difficult with this product."
    "It would also be great if the solution was less expensive."
    "It would possibly help to get more training, even better in local languages."
    "In the LTM solution, it would be beneficial to have more algorithms for traffic segmentation or the ability to create user-defined algorithms rather than being restricted to predefined ones."
    "Its scalability and deployment should be better. It should be more scalable, and it should be easier to deploy."
    "Technical support could be faster. It's something I'd like to see them work on in the future."
    "I have encountered an issue with technical support; not all the time, but a few times we have observed that we have not received proper support or on-time support, and sometimes the person assisting us is not properly skilled, but we have only observed this issue very few times."
    "The one gap I saw was that pure LBN integration is a little tricky. The insertion of F5 in LBN is a little tricky. They need to work on something, on products by which they can insert F5 in any sort of cloud environment."
    "It is a hardware load balancer, and its installation procedure is more complex than a software load balancer. There are pros and cons of using hardware load balancing. You have to have specific hardware deployed in your data center to activate this load balancer. They never came up with any software-based load balancing solution. It is all hardware-based."
    More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    Information not available
    "The price is little bit on higher side compared to the cost of NGINX."
    "Our company pays for the licensing cost on a yearly basis. Also, there are no extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
    "If your IT budget is good, go for it."
    "BIG-IP LTM isn't a cheap solution - I'd rate its pricing as three out of five."
    "It is a little pricey. I wish the pricing was cheaper, but I wish the pricing was cheaper for everything."
    "This product is costly from a licensing perspective considering its competitors."
    "F5 is expensive."
    "There are no additional fees to the standard licensing fee; everything is paid once."
    More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) pricing and cost advice
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    No data available
    Financial Services Firm
    13%
    Outsourcing Company
    12%
    Manufacturing Company
    8%
    Construction Company
    7%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    No data available
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business62
    Midsize Enterprise32
    Large Enterprise86
     

    Questions from the Community

    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
    What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP?
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) could improve file upload speeds when opening cases and attaching files; sometimes, downloading files like QKView takes time, depending on size. I expect faste...
    See all answers
    What is your primary use case for F5 BIG-IP?
    My main use case for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is placing our applications on F5 and the backend servers on the pool. We also regularly renew SSL certificates before they expire, usuall...
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)?
    The product is costly. I would rate the price a five out of ten.
    See all answers
     

    Comparisons

    NetScaler vs Brocade ADX [EOL] Logo
    NetScaler vs Brocade ADX [EOL]
    Compared 31% of the time
    LoadBalancer Enterprise vs Brocade ADX [EOL] Logo
    LoadBalancer Enterprise vs Brocade ADX [EOL]
    Compared 28% of the time
    HAProxy vs Brocade ADX [EOL] Logo
    HAProxy vs Brocade ADX [EOL]
    Compared 18% of the time
    Radware Alteon vs Brocade ADX [EOL] Logo
    Radware Alteon vs Brocade ADX [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    More Brocade ADX [EOL] Competitors
    Fortinet FortiADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    Fortinet FortiADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 8% of the time
    NetScaler vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    NetScaler vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 7% of the time
    HAProxy vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    HAProxy vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 6% of the time
    A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 5% of the time
    Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 5% of the time
    More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    October 2026
    Brocade ADX [EOL] reportDownload Brocade ADX [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    October 2026
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reportDownload F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) product report
     

    Also Known As

    ADX
    F5 BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP
     

    Overview

    Brocade ADX Series, used by service provider networks and large enterprise data centers, provides a comprehensive application delivery portfolio. All Brocade ADX platforms run the same software and support the same features. In addition, the base model for all Brocade ADX platforms can be upgraded via two software licenses - a Premium feature license and an SSL license. The Brocade ADX family of application delivery switches includes: Brocade ADX 1000 Series, Brocade ADX 4000 Series and Brocade ADX 10000 Series.
    HCLSoftware

    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) specializes in load balancing, iRules, and application security. It provides flexibility and stability, supporting SSL offloading and enhancing application performance and reliability with low downtime.

    F5 BIG-IP LTM is designed for efficient traffic management and security. Its intuitive interface allows users to customize traffic through iRules and ensures stable application delivery. Its performance stability and ability to inspect TLS traffic, along with web application firewall features, make it preferred for consistent application delivery. While praised for its capabilities, users note its challenges with complex configuration and management. Calls for streamlined processes, training, support, better logging, and cloud integration highlight areas for improvement.

    What are the key features of F5 BIG-IP LTM?
    • Load Balancing: Distributes HTTP and HTTPS traffic to ensure high availability.
    • iRules: Allows for customized traffic management.
    • Application Security: Includes TLS inspection and web application firewall capabilities.
    • SSL Offloading: Reduces server load by handling SSL processing.
    What benefits and ROI should users expect?
    • Performance Stability: Ensures high reliability and less downtime.
    • Flexibility: Offers customizable traffic management through iRules.
    • Security: Provides strong protection against application attacks.
    • Network Management Efficiency: Simplifies traffic distribution and infrastructure management.

    F5 BIG-IP LTM is widely used in industries requiring robust application delivery and security, such as finance and healthcare. It supports load balancing and traffic management across different environments and acts as a reverse proxy, helping companies secure their infrastructure against cyber threats while facilitating high availability and scalability.

    F5
     

    Sample Customers

    Fusebill, Niagra Falls Bridge Commission, Medien System Partner
    Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    October 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: October 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.