No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Brocade ADX [EOL] vs LoadBalancer Enterprise comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Brocade ADX [EOL]
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
LoadBalancer Enterprise
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (8th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user735237 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Technology Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Makes local load balancing relatively simple but could use more options for L7 load balancing
L7 load balancing features like URL re-write, persistence, etc. Also some of the global load balancing features like sticky, sticky-sync, etc Organization has a lot of client facing applications and needs to have multiple servers for scalability. With ADX network load balancer, local load…
SM
Senior L3 Cloud Platform Network & Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
High availability and strong security have supported our apps but advanced traffic control still improves
LoadBalancer Enterprise can be improved because the layer seven programmability is not as powerful as it could be. We cannot write code and programming on it. Additionally, access management and identity options are not available here like they are in F5 VPN. The WAF depth and analytics, such as in-depth logs and the WAF learning option that we have in other load balancers, are much easier to configure and to harden the policies and polish them. That option is not here. Fine-tuning is a bit difficult compared to other solutions. The automation and API maturity does not appear to be at the level of other load balancers. The main limitation is that there is nothing here with regards to F5 APM. There is no iRules option or policy option to manipulate the traffic according to requirements, which is a bit difficult. If an organization is basic and does not want very advanced features, then it is acceptable. However, if advanced features such as iRules are required, and complete detailed WAF monitoring is desired along with policies that can be learned and then implemented afterwards as you have in F5, then LoadBalancer Enterprise lacks these capabilities.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"ADX is better in capacity and its chassis-based product (10K) is much more scalable."
"Existing customers are trying to migrate from the physical F5 load balancer to the AVI load balancer because it is scalable and easily managed."
"The support is amazing; the company has an excellent support team, 24-hour support, and it's excellent, second to none."
"We now get notifications when pool members go down, and we eliminate our downtime by not sending traffic to downed pool members.​"
"From a customer point of view, they have what I would call an unbreakable service."
"It helps us to route the traffic to the available servers. If we didn't have Loadbalancer we would fail to set the end-user and it would cause a failure in the cluster."
"They've been rock solid; they're stable, we definitely use them within their capabilities, and they are very good on that."
"The support we have received from Loadbalancer.org has been good."
"We have about 30,000 connections going through at any one time and it's fine, it doesn't seem to sweat. It doesn't get overloaded."
 

Cons

"Should have more options for L7 load balancing. Also, troubleshooting is a little difficult with this product."
"The customer support for LoadBalancer Enterprise is good; however, it could be better. They need to improve their customer service and response time."
"If I have to say something, I suppose they could add an automated configuration backup to an FTP location (or something similar) so you don’t have to manually do it. I don’t see this as a problem, of course, as the configuration rarely changes and we only need one backup, but maybe for other users that feature would be handy."
"Loadbalancer.org's complexity could be reduced."
"It doesn't have the bonding capability feature."
"We have had one or two small crashes on them, nothing major, but I guess that would be the only thing stopping it from being a 10."
"There are many features you can set in the backend of Loadbalancer. They should simplify the configuration. The administrator should be able to configure it more simply. How it is now, you can only configure it if you have a lot of experience."
"Among the best features in LoadBalancer Enterprise, I note that some features are still not enabled compared to the on-premises environment."
"You can run into an issue when one engineer passes the case over to another engineer after their shift and they don't know what the first engineer worked on up to that point."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"For now, it's stable."
"I think it’s very affordable."
"It is inexpensive, and even their “unlimited” version, the VA MAX is still far cheaper than competitors."
"Loadbalancer.org is based on open-source products, but it requires money for support and other activities."
"Licensing fees are paid annually."
"I’m not entirely sure about the rating since I'm not very technical. I haven't thoroughly compared the ratings. So, if you're asking for my impression so far, I would rate it around five out of 10."
"I love that they do not price on some arbitrary throughput rating where you are guessing at what the load balancer is going to handle."
"They're not the cheapest, not the most expensive, but I think value-wise, they're 100%."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
15%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Do you recommend Loadbalancer.org?
Since Loadbalancer.org is an open-source solution, I would recommend this solution for smaller businesses that don’t have major scaling requirements and don’t have the budget for a commercial solut...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Loadbalancer.org?
The cost of LoadBalancer Enterprise is better and a bit cheaper compared to other products. The support level is also very good, and the maintenance cost is less than other products. The deployment...
What needs improvement with Loadbalancer.org?
LoadBalancer Enterprise can be improved because the layer seven programmability is not as powerful as it could be. We cannot write code and programming on it. Additionally, access management and id...
 

Also Known As

ADX
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Fusebill, Niagra Falls Bridge Commission, Medien System Partner
Vodafone, NASA, Mercedes, NBC, Siemens, AT&T, Barclays, Zurich, Penn State University, Fiserv, Canon, Toyota, University of Cambridge, US Army, US Navy, Ocean Spray, ASOS, Pfizer, BBC, Bacardi, Monsoon, River Island, U.S Air Force, King's College London, NHS, Ricoh, Philips, Santander, TATA Communications, Ericcson, Ross Video, Evertz, TalkTalk TV, Giacom, Rapid Host.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.