No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Brocade ADX [EOL] vs LoadBalancer Enterprise comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Brocade ADX [EOL]
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
LoadBalancer Enterprise
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (13th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user735237 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Technology Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Makes local load balancing relatively simple but could use more options for L7 load balancing
L7 load balancing features like URL re-write, persistence, etc. Also some of the global load balancing features like sticky, sticky-sync, etc Organization has a lot of client facing applications and needs to have multiple servers for scalability. With ADX network load balancer, local load…
Nigus Machin Amare - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Malam Engineering PLC
Load management and balancing efficiency that's flexible
Our primary use case for Loadbalancer.org is on the presale point for clients who use the solution for balancing loads The most valuable features of Loadbalancer.org are related to its load balancing capabilities. There is room for improvement in Loadbalancer.org in certain areas. For a…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"ADX is better in capacity and its chassis-based product (10K) is much more scalable."
"It has enabled us to have much better service to offer at a cheaper price, and much more resilient."
"The support we have received from Loadbalancer.org has been good."
"The connection that this solution helps our servers maintain has been most useful."
"We have about 30,000 connections going through at any one time and it's fine, it doesn't seem to sweat. It doesn't get overloaded."
"We can more easily set up a test environment, because you can easily configure your forms. It makes it more flexible for us, to convert our test environment to a production environment, without having to change DNSs on the outside. You just configure the forms on the inside. So without changing the actual endpoint for the end user, we can create completely different networks in the background."
"Most important for us that it makes sure that the load is distributed and that we always have access to the end servers."
"It's pretty much a Swiss Army knife for managing all the load balancing techniques."
"Load balancing helps us distribute both incoming and outgoing data loads evenly among the servers, preventing overload on a single server."
 

Cons

"Should have more options for L7 load balancing. Also, troubleshooting is a little difficult with this product."
"There are many features you can set in the backend of Loadbalancer. They should simplify the configuration."
"There are many features you can set in the backend of Loadbalancer. They should simplify the configuration. The administrator should be able to configure it more simply. How it is now, you can only configure it if you have a lot of experience."
"I'd like to see scalability improved; it can be costly."
"Compared to the physical products, the solution's throughput is a little less."
"The interface from Loadbalancer.org should be improved."
"You can run into an issue when one engineer passes the case over to another engineer after their shift and they don't know what the first engineer worked on up to that point."
"It's worth the cost. It's not cheap, but it's a good solution."
"Possibly a more graphical overview page (with colors) to give a two second overview to see if everything is working fine."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is inexpensive, and even their “unlimited” version, the VA MAX is still far cheaper than competitors."
"It was easy to upgrade the license for unlimited clusters and servers. Pricing is fair."
"For now, it's stable."
"It filled a requirement for our project, and it did so at lesser cost than their competitors.​"
"The solution requires an annual support license of $2,780 for four systems or $695 a year per unit for support not including the units."
"Loadbalancer.org is based on open-source products, but it requires money for support and other activities."
"They're not the cheapest, not the most expensive, but I think value-wise, they're 100%."
"I think it’s very affordable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Do you recommend Loadbalancer.org?
Since Loadbalancer.org is an open-source solution, I would recommend this solution for smaller businesses that don’t have major scaling requirements and don’t have the budget for a commercial solut...
What needs improvement with Loadbalancer.org?
There is room for improvement in Loadbalancer.org in certain areas.
 

Also Known As

ADX
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Fusebill, Niagra Falls Bridge Commission, Medien System Partner
Vodafone, NASA, Mercedes, NBC, Siemens, AT&T, Barclays, Zurich, Penn State University, Fiserv, Canon, Toyota, University of Cambridge, US Army, US Navy, Ocean Spray, ASOS, Pfizer, BBC, Bacardi, Monsoon, River Island, U.S Air Force, King's College London, NHS, Ricoh, Philips, Santander, TATA Communications, Ericcson, Ross Video, Evertz, TalkTalk TV, Giacom, Rapid Host.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, NetScaler, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: April 2026.
893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.