Bugcrowd vs OffSec Penetration Testing Services comparison

Bugcrowd and OffSec are both solutions in the Penetration Testing Services category. Bugcrowd is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4, while OffSec is ranked #10. Bugcrowd holds a 13.6% mindshare in PTS, compared to OffSec’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bugcrowd users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OffSec users who would recommend it.

Bugcrowd

Read 5 Bugcrowd reviews

3,443 Views
1,343 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OffSec Penetration Testing ...

Read 1 OffSec Penetration Testing Services review

253 Views
230 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bugcrowd

OffSec Penetration Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Bugcrowd and OffSec Penetration Testing Services compete in providing security testing solutions. Data shows Bugcrowd leads in cost efficiency and customer support, while OffSec stands out for its robust, feature-rich offerings.

Features: Bugcrowd provides dynamic testing driven by a large pool of researchers, known for flexibility and broad vulnerability coverage. Its adaptable approach and wide-ranging scope are significant advantages. OffSec offers intensive, structured training through courses with hands-on labs and detailed reporting tools, promoting skill development and professional growth.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bugcrowd features a flexible engagement model allowing quick implementation and supported by responsive customer service. OffSec has a structured deployment model focusing on in-depth application with extensive educational resources, although it requires more time to adapt.

Pricing and ROI: Bugcrowd has competitive pricing with effective cost coverage through diverse engagement models, ensuring a favorable ROI. OffSec's pricing reflects its deep training services' quality, providing significant long-term benefits. Bugcrowd is known for cost-effectiveness, while OffSec delivers considerable value through comprehensive skill enhancement.

To learn more, read our detailed Penetration Testing Services Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Penetration Testing Services

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bugcrowd

Ranking in Penetration Testing Services

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) (3rd), Bug Bounty Platforms (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (13th)

OffSec Penetration Testing ...

Ranking in Penetration Testing Services

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Penetration Testing Services category, the mindshare of Bugcrowd is 13.6%, down from 16.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OffSec Penetration Testing Services is 2.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Penetration Testing Services Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bugcrowd	13.6%
OffSec Penetration Testing Services	2.3%
Other	84.1%

Penetration Testing Services

Featured Reviews

Ben Gurney

Senior Engineering Manager - Platform Team at eTender Inc

Crowdsourced triage has uncovered critical website vulnerabilities and continuously improves our security posture

Bugcrowd could be improved or enhanced as they seem to have a lot of internal churn at the moment, so they could be more stable and more customer-focused. By customer-focused, I mean they are not very good at communicating what is changing on their side to their customers. I am now on my fourth account manager within one year. My latest call with them was with the fourth account manager saying there have been many changes and apologizing that no one I have spoken to in the past is on this call, but going forwards it will be them. With the fourth account manager in a year, it is hard to trust that message.

Read full review

Gabriel Woolverton

Penetration Tester at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees

Open source and easy to set up

Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services has a rating system for how exploitable vulnerability is, but that rating system does not really give you any transparency into how the rating for that exploit was reached. It would be useful to see on the back end what data led them to specify that a specific exploit may not be very good or may be great. If we had some data correlated with that, we could see why it is that this one should be successful versus another.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would rate Bugcrowd a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable aspect of Bugcrowd is that it provides a long list of different websites or web applications where I can report vulnerabilities."

"One of the features I like most about Bugcrowd is the ability to create a report in a very easy way."

"Bugcrowd's support team is very active and supportive."

"Bugcrowd's use of crowdsourced hackers has helped in discovering unique vulnerabilities."

"Bugcrowd has programs that disclose rewards and invite researchers to new programs."

"I believe Bugcrowd is highly stable."

"Working on Bugcrowd has made me a better security engineer since it provides a competitive environment to report successful vulnerabilities."

"Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is open source, so it is free and there are no licensing costs."

Cons

"Bugcrowd could be improved or enhanced as they seem to have a lot of internal churn at the moment, so they could be more stable and more customer-focused."

"The triaging process has slowed down compared to three years ago. It now takes more time to resolve a reported vulnerability and receive the payout."

"Bugcrowd should provide more access to the reports, similar to HackerOne, allowing for full disclosure once a bug is resolved, so researchers can learn from them. They should improve the responsibility type and response time of their customer support, especially when the issue is urgent."

"The triaging process has slowed down compared to three years ago."

"There is room for improvement in Bugcrowd's response time when customer input is needed for resolving tickets."

"There is room for improvement in Bugcrowd's response time when customer input is needed for resolving tickets. If this time could be minimized, it would be very helpful."

"Bugcrowd should provide more access to the reports, similar to HackerOne, allowing for full disclosure once a bug is resolved, so researchers can learn from them."

"Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services has a rating system for how exploitable vulnerability is, but that rating system does not really give you any transparency into how the rating for that exploit was reached. It would be useful to see on the back end what data led them to specify that a specific exploit may not be very good or may be great."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Penetration Testing Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bugcrowd?

I think the pricing and licensing of Bugcrowd are expensive, but we do get good value from it, as we find vulnerabilities that we would otherwise be unaware of.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bugcrowd?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bugcrowd?

I work with Bugcrowd mostly as a crowdsourcing security platform. I use Bugcrowd by putting a brief on Bugcrowd's website, and then their community of security researchers hunt for vulnerabilities ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HackerOne vs Bugcrowd

Compared 54% of the time

Synack vs Bugcrowd

Compared 20% of the time

YesWeHack vs Bugcrowd

Compared 8% of the time

Intigriti vs Bugcrowd

Compared 5% of the time

More Bugcrowd Competitors

Fortinet Penetration Testing Service vs OffSec Penetration Testing Services

Compared 32% of the time

Cytelligence Penetration Testing vs OffSec Penetration Testing Services

Compared 32% of the time

More OffSec Penetration Testing Services Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP)

December 2025

Download Bugcrowd product report

Buyer's Guide

Penetration Testing Services

December 2025

OffSec Penetration Testing Services report

Download OffSec Penetration Testing Services product report

Overview

By combining a vast and diverse workforce with a results-driven model, crowdsourced security programs outperform traditional methods-every time.

Bugcrowd

OffSec Penetration Testing Services provides advanced security assessments to help organizations identify and address vulnerabilities, ensuring robust protection of digital assets.

OffSec Penetration Testing Services offers in-depth security evaluations tailored for organizations seeking to protect their infrastructure from potential threats. By simulating real-world cyber attacks, it helps identify weaknesses that traditional security measures might overlook. Clients benefit from expert analysis and actionable insights aimed at enhancing their cybersecurity posture.

What features define OffSec Penetration Testing Services?

Comprehensive Testing: Simulates real-world attack scenarios to uncover hidden vulnerabilities.
Expert Analysis: Detailed insights from seasoned security professionals.
Customized Reports: Actionable findings tailored to client-specific environments.
Secure Infrastructure: Focuses on protecting sensitive data and systems.
Continuous Support: Offers guidance throughout the remediation process.

Why should you consider OffSec Penetration Testing Services?

Improved Security: Reinforces defense mechanisms by identifying weak points.
Compliance Readiness: Helps achieve regulatory compliance through thorough risk assessments.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces potential breach costs by preemptively addressing vulnerabilities.
Strategic Planning: Provides insights that inform security strategies and investments.

In sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology, OffSec Penetration Testing Services has proven crucial for safeguarding sensitive data. By adapting to the unique risks of each industry, it ensures that security measures align with specific threats, fostering trust and reliability in their security frameworks.

OffSec

Sample Customers

Zephyr Health, Barracuda Networks, Western Union, Instructure, Aruba Networks, Pinterest, CARD.com, WINK, (ISC)2, StatusPage, WHMCS, Movember

Amazon, IBM, Oracle, U.S. Department of Defense, Deloitte, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Penetration Testing Services

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Horizon3.ai, HackerOne, Bugcrowd and others in Penetration Testing Services. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Penetration Testing Services vendors.

We monitor all Penetration Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.