CA Unified Communications Monitor vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #103, while IBM is ranked #42 with an average rating of 7.5. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to IBM’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of IBM users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

185 Views
133 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Read 54 IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) reviews

1,867 Views
1,079 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

```html

CA Unified Communications Monitor and IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) compete in the network performance monitoring space. While CA Unified Communications Monitor is valued for affordability and support, IBM SevOne NPM offers superior advanced features, justifying its higher price.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides real-time monitoring tailored for communication networks, efficient alert systems, and strong integration support with unified communication tools. IBM SevOne NPM excels in comprehensive network analytics, automated reporting, and predictive performance capabilities across diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could improve in simplifying its configuration processes, adding enhanced reporting features, and supporting wider network integrations. IBM SevOne NPM might refine its cost structure, expand compatibility with third-party tools, and enhance usability for less technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM SevOne NPM offers a user-friendly deployment process and excellent documentation, paired with responsive customer service for smooth operations. CA Unified Communications Monitor has a more complex setup but is supported by a helpful service team.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor is competitively priced, delivering solid ROI for budget-conscious businesses, particularly mid-sized ones. IBM SevOne NPM, despite a higher cost, provides valuable ROI for enterprises needing in-depth network analysis.

```

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

103rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

72nd

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th)

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

42nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

46th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (19th), Log Management (48th), Cloud Monitoring Software (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Grzegorz Nowak

Solution Architect at Wingu

Improves infrastructure planning by helping us analyze network traffic

We use SevOne to collect and report on network flows SevOne improves infrastructure planning by helping us analyze network traffic. We can look at bandwidth for specific endpoints on the customer's network and analyze traffic to identify issues. For example, maybe some connectors are unavailable.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"I like the tool’s scalability and real-time reports. Earlier, we struggled to give real-time reports to clients. I also like the tool’s deployment model where we can deploy it either on-premises or in-house. We don’t have to carry the data all over the globe. Also, I am impressed with the tool's flow reporting and Wi-Fi."

"The automation feature is good because if your CMDB is OK and it is already in sync, then the automation part is good to go."

"The modules and the performance management reports that come with data insights are two of the most valuable features. I also find the reports for Wi-Fi, Netflow, LAN, and WAN for monitoring to be very good."

"The most valuable feature is the NMS because that's the core of the system. Without the NMS, the other tools aren't that usable."

"In 90% of the cases, new devices are plug-and-play, so when a new version comes out then SevOne has support for it out of the box."

"I like SevOne's network flow reporting."

"SevOne has rich API capabilities, giving us the flexibility to control what we collect and customize the collection, creation, and manipulation of now metrics as necessary."

"Flexible architecture: You can extend the system and its capacity by attaching another cluster pair."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pros

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"The reports are easy to configure but they are a bit outdated in terms of appearance and visualization."

"SevOne should work with the graphs legend functionality."

"User-friendly, multi-tenancy."

"One area that requires a little bit of improvement is the topology of visualization and being able to map out connections, end-to-end. It's able to do that, but it's not as impressive as we would like it to be. We would like to understand the different interface types and the connection points better, through the visualization. Heatmaps also need further development."

"When I started using it, I tried adding one of the BroadWorks application servers into SevOne... it created thousands and thousands of objects from that one application server and we immediately ran out of license... It would help, when new objects are discovered, if there were a way to categorize those objects and to pick the part of the object you need..."

"There are some tweaks and enhancements that I've already requested. One is to be able to make changes per device rather than as a global setting. That has to do with naming. It's minor."

"The customizations are very hard. The person doing it has to be very good at analytics and has to be very good in all languages"

"I would like to see live maps as an added feature. Also, build modules on AI and EML to provide better data insights that would proactively tell us what we should be looking after."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Have a bank of licenses, because it is about the number of objects (RAM, ports, CPU, etc.)."

"For the value that you get from SevOne, it's worth the price. There are a lot of cheaper alternatives on the market, and even free options. But they require more staff, more resources, and engineers with more advanced knowledge of monitoring. That's what makes SevOne worth the price."

"A blocking point is the high upfront cost because it is challenging to get it accepted and the purchase approved."

"The tool is not expensive. We were able to negotiate with SevOne on pricing."

"The pricing has been fair."

"Although I don't have exact details in terms of cost, my experience has been that SevOne is willing to make a deal with the customer."

"Many tools price things based on the number of KPIs that you're collecting around a device. In many cases, there could be hundreds of metrics that you need to collect. SevOne provides device-level pricing. That gives us the flexibility to turn on, and expand on, the metrics that we're collecting around those devices, without taking a financial hit."

"The pricing has not evolved with the market, which is one of the reasons we are moving to a new product."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Legal Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with SevOne Network Data Platform?

There is room for improvement in the integration with different vendors and the reporting capabilities. It would be beneficial to have out-of-the-box integration with third-party vendors and improv...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SevOne Network Data Platform?

The primary use case of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) ( /products/ibm-sevone-network-performance-management-npm-reviews ) is network monitoring. It helps to maintain the infrastru...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SevOne Network Data Platform?

To compete with custom-built tools, IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) should accommodate the desired features and be timely in the delivery of feature updates. I would rate the overal...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 10% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

May 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

May 2025

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) report

Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

SevOne

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

The IBM® SevOne Network Performance Management (IBM SevOne NPM) solution helps you spot, address, and prevent network performance issues early with machine learning-powered analytics from a single source. Boost network performance and improve your user application experience by proactively monitoring your multivendor end-to-end network across enterprise, communication, and managed service provider networks.

Transform raw network performance data into intelligent and actionable insights. The IBM SevOne NPM solution goes beyond detection, combining industry-leading expertise and advanced technology to help your IT team plan and optimize your network and act on what matters: improving network performance to provide an exceptional customer experience.

For further information, please visit www.ibm.com/cloud/sevo...

IBM

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

ATOS, Devereux, Spark New Zealand, Access4, Rogers Communication, Lumen (formerly known as CenturyLink)

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

May 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.