Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points comparison

Cambium Networks and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cambium Networks is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3, while TP-Link is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Cambium Networks holds a 2.0% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cambium Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Read 20 Cambium Networks Wireless LAN reviews

1,387 Views
1,387 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,138 Views
3,107 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Omada Access Points and Cambium Networks Wireless LAN compete in the wireless networking category. Omada holds an advantage in cost-effectiveness and support, whereas Cambium is preferred for its robust features catering to demanding environments.

Features: Omada Access Points offer value-driven pricing, cloud management, and integration across different devices. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN provides high-density support, scalability, and enhanced security.

Room for Improvement: Omada could enhance its support for high-density environments and improve some of its enterprise functionalities. Cambium might benefit from simplifying its initial configuration process and can work on reducing costs where possible.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Omada Access Points emphasize ease of use and quick setup, ideal for businesses seeking hassle-free deployment. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN provides a versatile deployment model with comprehensive customer service, suited for complex installations.

Pricing and ROI: Omada Access Points are characterized by low setup costs and a short timeframe for ROI, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN requires higher initial investment but promises long-term gains through superior performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Omada Access Points

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is 2.0%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN	2.0%
Omada Access Points	3.8%
Other	94.2%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Manoj Adiga

Senior Manager Solutions at iBus Network & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Reliable connectivity and robust support enhance customer experience

We are working with version 2.0, which is usually the latest one.Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is 100% reliable, as I have never faced any issues in our deployment after deployment, and the support is also very good. It takes a maximum of 15-20 minutes to configure one particular site of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN. The usual deployment process involves inspecting the hardware at our warehouse, dispatching it to the customer location, where the vendor installs the access point, and once it has internet, the configuration will be directly pushed from the cloud to the access point, making it up and running. Currently, around 100 plus of my customers are using this solution. My customers are a mix of medium and enterprise businesses. The least amount my customers usually pay is around $1,000, and the largest amount is approximately $10,000 per year. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Cambium Networks Wireless LAN a 9 overall.

Read full review

reviewer1253430

Development & Innovation Expert at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

They have good specs, and the price is lower than competing solutions

Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development. They could also enhance the reporting capabilities. At the same time, Omada's reporting has improved considerably in the latest version. That was an issue for us, but now it seems okay. More carrier-grade integrations should be available on Omada access points in the future. They could also add a hot spot and maybe a mobile upload solution. I still have issues from time to time when switching access points. I'm still connected to the SSID, but my signal drops when I switch from 5 Ghz to 2.4 Ghz. I'm not switched to the other access point that is closer to me. I should have been switched automatically to the other access point. Occasionally, the handoff doesn't work. I have tried this with WiFi 6, and it worked fine, so I think they may have resolved this issue in the latest versions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It offers features that are essential for an efficient and high-performance wireless LAN deployment, where capacity, coverage, and quality are optimized, and frequency bands are selected based on the specific needs of the network."

"It provides strong coverage for outdoor areas."

"The product has valuable throughput capabilities. It also has an inbuilt spectrum analyzer for stable connectivity."

"The web-based administration is what I find most beneficial."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is easy to deploy. The implementation can take two weeks to four months."

"The product's initial setup phase is very simple and involves just a PnP process."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is 100% reliable, as I have never faced any issues in our deployment after deployment, and the support is also very good."

"The cloud-based management provided by Cambium Networks is particularly valuable to us, as it allows us to efficiently manage Wi-Fi, point-to-point connections, firewalls, and switches across various locations from a centralized platform. This enables us to be proactive in providing support and ensures smooth operations for our clients."

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN pros

"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."

"The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"Its sturdiness and cost-effectiveness are the most valuable features."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"This product is easy to use."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"Channel management required manual intervention, especially in environments with multiple floors, leading to potential signal interference issues."

"The problem with the tool is that its prices are on the higher end."

"The solution should be scalable, offering better pricing options as we optimize the network for coverage, capacity, and quality"

"The capacity and coverage could be improved."

"Our areas for improvement would be a refresh with the most recent technology available."

"The solution’s technical support could be faster."

"What could be improved in Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is its efficiency in large areas because we noticed that there's a need to increase the APs in large rooms or spaces for the Wi-Fi to be more efficient. Another area for improvement in Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is bandwidth management. This is a feature that Meraki has that allows you to control user bandwidth, so my company has a pilot project to test Meraki Wireless LAN. Bandwidth control is an additional feature I'd like to see in Cambium Networks Wireless LAN as that would make the solution better."

"If they could include some sort of web filtering, in-built antivirus, anti-malware, and data stream scanning in the next release."

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN cons

"The technical support could be improved."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"There should be more remote support for the mobile application."

"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"High-end products from Cambium PTP, point-to-point radio, maybe cost around $1000 per year."

"If one is a high price and ten is a low price, I rate the product price as one."

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"It is an expensive product compared to other competitors."

"The licensing costs for this solution are calculated per asset, and depending on the model of the equipment, it starts at $230, and goes up to roughly $1,200. The benefit of this solution is that there are no hidden costs; no cost for managing the equipment, and no cost for maintaining the equipment during its usable lifetime."

"I would place it in the mid-range market segment, balancing affordability and profitability."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is cheaper than Aruba."

"It's a good price, but not the best price. It's on the higher end of what I would call affordable for small to medium-sized businesses."

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

16%

Educational Organization

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?

It is a stable and secure platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?

Cambium's pricing is better compared to Ruckus, which has multiple components with associated costs, like license support and access point support costs. Although nominal, these costs are still there.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?

I would Cambium Networks to improve by having more products on the product side.I would want more WiFi products, specifically WiFi indoor access point products. They should also look into getting a...

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 11% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 6% of the time

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Omada Access Points

Compared 3% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

February 2026

Download Cambium Networks Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

January 2026

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

No data available

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Information not available

Cambium Networks

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Omada Access Points

February 2026

Free Report: Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.