Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points comparison

Cambium Networks and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cambium Networks is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.6, while TP-Link is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.9. Cambium Networks holds a 1.3% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cambium Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Read 19 Cambium Networks Wireless LAN reviews

1,139 Views
1,139 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,717 Views
3,680 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Omada Access Points and Cambium Networks Wireless LAN compete in the wireless networking category. Omada holds an advantage in cost-effectiveness and support, whereas Cambium is preferred for its robust features catering to demanding environments.

Features: Omada Access Points offer value-driven pricing, cloud management, and integration across different devices. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN provides high-density support, scalability, and enhanced security.

Room for Improvement: Omada could enhance its support for high-density environments and improve some of its enterprise functionalities. Cambium might benefit from simplifying its initial configuration process and can work on reducing costs where possible.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Omada Access Points emphasize ease of use and quick setup, ideal for businesses seeking hassle-free deployment. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN provides a versatile deployment model with comprehensive customer service, suited for complex installations.

Pricing and ROI: Omada Access Points are characterized by low setup costs and a short timeframe for ROI, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN requires higher initial investment but promises long-term gains through superior performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Omada Access Points

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 4.1%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Mike Scofield

Director of Technology at a educational organization with 51-200 employees

Provides efficient, controllerless setup and supports high client numbers

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN was well-priced and offered a controllerless setup, which was more unusual at the time we first used them. This meant they could operate independently without a controller, unlike many other products that required a controller. Also, they had a software-based controller or management system that we initially used. The product was scalable, allowing for fewer access points to cover more area, and supported a high number of clients. We were able to deploy them across multiple sites within a limited timeframe, thanks to their efficient setup process.

Read full review

Prasad Wijesooriya

IT Manager at Hala Equipment Trading LLC

Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability

The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can scale it if we need to."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is 100% reliable, as I have never faced any issues in our deployment after deployment, and the support is also very good."

"The product is user-friendly and helps with cost minimization."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN was well-priced and offered a controllerless setup, which was more unusual at the time we first used them. This meant they could operate independently without a controller, unlike many other products that required a controller."

"This solution is extremely user-friendly; it is very easy to configure and work with."

"They all have controllers built in, and we manage them all with a web-based management tool."

"Cambium is more economical compared to Cisco or Ruckus, which makes it suitable for budget-conscious customers."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN was highly scalable, allowing deployment of fewer access points while covering more area, adapting well with the evolution of wireless standards."

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"Omada is a good solution that I would recommend, and it is less expensive while providing good results."

"Omada is easy to manage, has cloud management features, and is easy to set up."

"The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance."

"The initial setup is not complicated."

"This product is easy to use."

"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."

"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"The problem with this radio wireless technology is that it cannot compete in terms of bandwidth with the fiber optics at this moment. That's the biggest weakness."

"Not a lot of technical engineers are familiar with Cambium Networks Wireless LAN. They are familiar with implementing and using other solutions such as Aruba. Therefore, Cambium Networks needs to be more visible in the marketplace."

"I believe there's room for improvement in the configuration options for point-to-point setups directly from the cloud management interface. Currently, the process feels a bit clunky—you monitor the unit in the cloud but need to make configuration changes by editing a text file, then downloading it back to the unit. This method can be error-prone, as even a small mistake in the text file could disrupt the unit's configuration."

"I would rate the initial setup of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN as seven out of ten. It's not easy to do some of the access point configurations sometimes, as the policy cannot be mapped easily, which is the reason for my rating."

"The direct technical support from Cambium teams needs to be improved."

"The product pricing needs improvement."

"What could be improved in Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is its efficiency in large areas because we noticed that there's a need to increase the APs in large rooms or spaces for the Wi-Fi to be more efficient. Another area for improvement in Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is bandwidth management. This is a feature that Meraki has that allows you to control user bandwidth, so my company has a pilot project to test Meraki Wireless LAN. Bandwidth control is an additional feature I'd like to see in Cambium Networks Wireless LAN as that would make the solution better."

"The capacity and coverage could be improved."

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN cons

"There should be more remote support for the mobile application."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."

"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing might vary based on each country's specific needs and telecommunication regulations."

"The licensing costs for this solution are calculated per asset, and depending on the model of the equipment, it starts at $230, and goes up to roughly $1,200. The benefit of this solution is that there are no hidden costs; no cost for managing the equipment, and no cost for maintaining the equipment during its usable lifetime."

"In general, the way we purchased it was we purchased it at the beginning, was with five years of support, once our initial cost was met, we didn't have to pay for anything else."

"High-end products from Cambium PTP, point-to-point radio, maybe cost around $1000 per year."

"The pricing for Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is much cheaper than Meraki. For example, I have to pay $200 for one AP from Cambium, while for a Meraki AP, I have to pay $450 including the user license. Meraki has a higher price over Cambium Networks Wireless LAN."

"If one is a high price and ten is a low price, I rate the product price as one."

"I would place it in the mid-range market segment, balancing affordability and profitability."

"It's a good price, but not the best price. It's on the higher end of what I would call affordable for small to medium-sized businesses."

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

11%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?

It is a stable and secure platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?

Cambium's pricing is better compared to Ruckus, which has multiple components with associated costs, like license support and access point support costs. Although nominal, these costs are still there.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?

I would Cambium Networks to improve by having more products on the product side.I would want more WiFi products, specifically WiFi indoor access point products. They should also look into getting a...

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 26% of the time

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 17% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 14% of the time

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 10% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 4% of the time

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 19% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

August 2025

Download Cambium Networks Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

August 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

No data available

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Information not available

Cambium Networks

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Omada Access Points

July 2025

Free Report: Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.