Huawei Wireless vs Omada Access Points comparison

"The solution is easily managed compared to other wireless solutions."

"The solution's most valuable feature is mobility or seamless roaming."

"At the moment, I only have experience with the on-premise deployment of Huawei Wireless, but the cloud solution looks good on paper. It looks perfect. I can say that Huawei's cybersecurity is very good, stable, and works for long periods. My company has four devices running uptime for more than four years without stopping. I also like that the support for Huawei Wireless is swift, and support does precisely what you require, at least from the point of view of the technical engineer who communicated with Huawei support, as I'm more of a technical sales guy. Good technical support is vital to my company, partners, and customers. My company had this ongoing project with an ISP provider in Bulgaria that bought some routers. Still, the existing equipment was a completely different brand, so this provider wanted to migrate to Huawei Wireless and wanted help while migrating the existing infrastructure to Huawei, so the technical engineer assigned to raise the ticket with Huawei for checking and setting parameters correctly provided feedback about Huawei technical support being good quality-wise and TAT-wise. The technical engineer was also Cisco-certified and Juniper-certified and was not experienced with Huawei equipment. Still, he did mention that the Huawei Wireless router interface was straightforward, and even a person who's new to it would find it easy to configure. Huawei Wireless is user-friendly, which is another pro of the solution. It's easy to manage, and even the program language setting can be done with fewer commands than Juniper and Cisco equipment. Some of the features in Juniper need an external program, and the same features can be found in Huawei Wireless built-in, which I find remarkable."

"Installation is easy."

"The solution's roaming feature is very nice. When you move to another place it automatically changes the access point. It's one of the most valuable features."

"The most valuable thing about Huawei Wireless is that it is one of the cheapest WiFi 6 systems. Its price is very nice. The other WiFi systems cost about 15% more."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The solution has high performance and we are using Wi-Fi 6 that we have found to be the best coverage."

"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."

"We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisfied with Omada's performance as an engineer."

"The initial setup is not complicated."

"Omada is a good solution that I would recommend, and it is less expensive while providing good results."

"What needs improvement in Huawei Wireless is after-sales support. I've faced many after-sales support issues, so that's the area I want Huawei to improve. Having an SLA with customers is what I'd suggest to Huawei Wireless."

"I have already integrated the radius system with Cisco and Huawei products, but it can be further improved to be more user-friendly and easier to use."

"Huawei Wireless is not scalable. We have had a problem with the solution because it cannot integrate with other servers as the other competitors can."

"Huawei Wireless can improve the signal, sometimes it becomes weak."

"The speed could be a bit better."

"They should include more security features in the solution."

"Given that Wi-Fi 7 is a new protocol, compatibility with other devices like phones and computers that lack this technology could be enhanced."

"The stability could be improved."

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."

"The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."

"Huawei Wireless is an expensive product. I'm rating it as one out of ten, price-wise."

"The price is good for the solution and there is a license required."

"Extras come with a surcharge."

"The platform is less costly than one of its competitors. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"I rate Huawei Wireless' pricing a five out of ten."

"The price of Huawei Wireless is very good."

"Its price is very good. This wireless system totally costs about 30,000 euros, and some of the other solutions cost about 45,000 euros. It is a difference of 15,000 euros, which is quite a lot of money."

"We don't have any control on the pricing. This comes from Huawei in India. Pricing-wise, Huawei is very aggressive and competitive if you compare them to competitors, like Cisco, Aruba, and Ruckus. The Indian Huawei team tells us, "Just pick up the order and design the infrastructure. If there are any pricing challenge, we'll work on that and we will try to match things 100 percent.""

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."