Huawei Wireless vs Omada Access Points comparison

Huawei and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Huawei is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while TP-Link is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Huawei holds a 5.6% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Huawei users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Huawei Wireless

Read 36 Huawei Wireless reviews

4,539 Views
4,448 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,138 Views
3,107 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Huawei Wireless

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Huawei Wireless and Omada Access Points are significant players in the wireless access point market. Huawei's competitive pricing and extensive features slightly edge out Omada, especially in larger scale deployments, while Omada is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and suitability for small to medium enterprises.

Features: Huawei Wireless includes seamless roaming, cloud integration, and high-stability with Wi-Fi 6. It is noted for its affordability and ease of configuration. Omada Access Points are valued for their reliability, ease of use, and integration with centralized systems, enhancing business operations and network control.

Room for Improvement: Huawei Wireless needs better support services, improved interoperability with third-party systems, and SMB-targeted solutions. Omada Access Points could benefit from better scalability, more robust security features, and enhanced advanced management tools to cater to various industry needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huawei Wireless provides both on-premises and public cloud deployment with simple configuration and strong support, though response times could improve. Omada is noted for its easy on-premises setup and consistent customer support, despite some feeling the technical response could be quicker.

Pricing and ROI: Huawei Wireless is more affordable than competitors like Cisco and does not require recurring license fees, offering a good return on investment for larger installations. Omada stands out for low initial costs and the absence of additional subscription fees, providing a budget-friendly solution for smaller businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Huawei Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Huawei Wireless is 5.6%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Huawei Wireless	5.6%
Omada Access Points	3.8%
Other	90.6%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Fahad Doguwa

Deputy Manager at Central Bank of Nigeria

Affordable platform with efficient analytics features

Huawei adapters have facilitated seamless integration with mobile devices, extending the LAN's reach. Additionally, including CampusInsight, a component offering analytics and visibility into wireless connectivity, has proven invaluable. This feature enables us to monitor network health and troubleshoot user-related issues efficiently. The reliability has had a positive impact on our operations. I advise others to go for Cisco if cost is not a factor. Otherwise, they can explore other options based on the availability of that OEM within the country. We have Huawei present in our country and provide all the necessary support, so we went forward with them. I rate it a nine out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer1253430

Development & Innovation Expert at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

They have good specs, and the price is lower than competing solutions

Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development. They could also enhance the reporting capabilities. At the same time, Omada's reporting has improved considerably in the latest version. That was an issue for us, but now it seems okay. More carrier-grade integrations should be available on Omada access points in the future. They could also add a hot spot and maybe a mobile upload solution. I still have issues from time to time when switching access points. I'm still connected to the SSID, but my signal drops when I switch from 5 Ghz to 2.4 Ghz. I'm not switched to the other access point that is closer to me. I should have been switched automatically to the other access point. Occasionally, the handoff doesn't work. I have tried this with WiFi 6, and it worked fine, so I think they may have resolved this issue in the latest versions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its simplicity."

"We've found the solution to be quite stable."

"From an implementation perspective, it's easy. I rate it a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup, and ten is an easy setup."

"It is easy to set up."

"It is based on 802.11ax, which is a new technology. There are several valuable things, such as its speed and mobility. There are options for self-organizing networking so that it can perform operations and maintain itself. Its three interfaces are very good and user friendly."

"What I like most about Huawei Wireless is that it's customizable. It has many unique features, such as encryption, spatial streams, hiding features for different scenarios, low-density and high-density areas, and smart antennas."

"The solution is very user-friendly and easy to use."

"The best feature of Huawei Wireless is the quick and fast setup."

More Huawei Wireless pros

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"Omada is a good solution that I would recommend, and it is less expensive while providing good results."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its price."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"The initial setup is not complicated."

"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Its sturdiness and cost-effectiveness are the most valuable features."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"The manageability could be improved."

"Price is one of the major problems of the solution, and because of this, our company's customers want to migrate to some other product from Huawei."

"This solution has issues with bugs and instability."

"Improving the visibility, control offered, and cloud management would all be very helpful. Also how you can monetize the information you get from Wi-Fi controllers should be improved."

"What needs improvement in Huawei Wireless is after-sales support. I've faced many after-sales support issues, so that's the area I want Huawei to improve. Having an SLA with customers is what I'd suggest to Huawei Wireless."

"The solution could be easier to use."

"Cloud integration needs to be improved."

"The security of the solution could be better in the future."

More Huawei Wireless cons

"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."

"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Extras come with a surcharge."

"The price is good for the solution and there is a license required."

"I rate Huawei Wireless' pricing a five out of ten."

"Huawei Wireless is an expensive solution."

"To compete effectively, Huawei might consider adjusting pricing to align more closely with other competitive brands, particularly those offering lower-cost solutions."

"The price of Huawei Wireless is very good."

"I would rate them something, like, eight to nine, on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Huawei Wireless is an expensive product. I'm rating it as one out of ten, price-wise."

More Huawei Wireless pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Which wireless solution would you choose - Huawei or D-Link?

Huawei wireless is a strong and solid product that has a lot of features - and for all that it offers, it happens to be very cost effective. As a wireless solution, it is simple and its user interf...

See all answers

What do you like most about Huawei Wireless?

The reliability has had a positive impact on our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Huawei Wireless?

For SMB customers with limited wireless users, Huawei Wireless may not be suitable due to the lack of multiple access points and the need for a centralized SSID. However, for large-capacity custome...

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 12% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 12% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 11% of the time

Aruba Access Points vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 4% of the time

More Huawei Wireless Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Huawei Wireless

January 2026

Download Huawei Wireless product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

January 2026

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

Huawei WLAN

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Huawei WLAN products are compatible with 802.11a/b/g/n/ac standards to establish high-speed, secure, and reliable wireless network connections for indoor and outdoor applications.WLAN products can be used in enterprise offices, schools, hospitals, large shopping malls, exhibition centers, airports, and more.

Huawei

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Anhui Agricultural University (AAU), China Everbright Bank

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points

February 2026

Free Report: Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.