Huawei Wireless vs Omada Access Points comparison

Huawei and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Huawei is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.9, while TP-Link is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.6. Huawei holds a 6.3% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Huawei users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Huawei Wireless

Read 36 Huawei Wireless reviews

4,596 Views
4,504 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,354 Views
3,320 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Huawei Wireless

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Huawei Wireless and Omada Access Points are significant players in the wireless access point market. Huawei's competitive pricing and extensive features slightly edge out Omada, especially in larger scale deployments, while Omada is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and suitability for small to medium enterprises.

Features: Huawei Wireless includes seamless roaming, cloud integration, and high-stability with Wi-Fi 6. It is noted for its affordability and ease of configuration. Omada Access Points are valued for their reliability, ease of use, and integration with centralized systems, enhancing business operations and network control.

Room for Improvement: Huawei Wireless needs better support services, improved interoperability with third-party systems, and SMB-targeted solutions. Omada Access Points could benefit from better scalability, more robust security features, and enhanced advanced management tools to cater to various industry needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huawei Wireless provides both on-premises and public cloud deployment with simple configuration and strong support, though response times could improve. Omada is noted for its easy on-premises setup and consistent customer support, despite some feeling the technical response could be quicker.

Pricing and ROI: Huawei Wireless is more affordable than competitors like Cisco and does not require recurring license fees, offering a good return on investment for larger installations. Omada stands out for low initial costs and the absence of additional subscription fees, providing a budget-friendly solution for smaller businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Huawei Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Huawei Wireless is 6.3%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 4.1%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Huawei Wireless	6.3%
Omada Access Points	4.1%
Other	89.6%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Fahad Doguwa

Deputy Manager at Central Bank of Nigeria

Affordable platform with efficient analytics features

Huawei adapters have facilitated seamless integration with mobile devices, extending the LAN's reach. Additionally, including CampusInsight, a component offering analytics and visibility into wireless connectivity, has proven invaluable. This feature enables us to monitor network health and troubleshoot user-related issues efficiently. The reliability has had a positive impact on our operations. I advise others to go for Cisco if cost is not a factor. Otherwise, they can explore other options based on the availability of that OEM within the country. We have Huawei present in our country and provide all the necessary support, so we went forward with them. I rate it a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Prasad Wijesooriya

IT Manager at Hala Equipment Trading LLC

Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability

The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's Wi-Fi 7 solution stands out as it offers cutting-edge technology in wireless communication, enhancing bandwidth management and coverage."

"All of the features are valuable in Huawei Wireless."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its simplicity."

"The solution's most valuable feature is mobility or seamless roaming."

"The solution is easily managed compared to other wireless solutions."

"The solution is very user-friendly and easy to use."

"This solution is very simple and the interface is user-friendly."

"The product is simple and easy to use."

More Huawei Wireless pros

"This product is easy to use."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"Omada is a good solution that I would recommend, and it is less expensive while providing good results."

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."

"Omada is easy to manage, has cloud management features, and is easy to set up."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"The solution should offer more integration with third-party servers and devices."

"While I am fine with the current licensing price, I would appreciate it to be more cost-effective."

"There could be a console port for demonstration or configuration purposes."

"Given that Wi-Fi 7 is a new protocol, compatibility with other devices like phones and computers that lack this technology could be enhanced."

"The scalability could be better."

"Huawei Wireless can improve the signal, sometimes it becomes weak."

"The solution's integration with some AAA servers like Aruba ClearPass is difficult and could be improved."

"As such, there are no problems. It has been good. There were some issues with the network design, but that is not specifically related to the product. We had to make some improvements in the network design. The product as such is fine, and there are no big issues. We are using the latest version having most of the features available in the industry, so the specs are very high. If something new comes up new in the industry, it needs to be incorporated into the product."

More Huawei Wireless cons

"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."

"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."

"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."

"The technical support could be improved."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Huawei Wireless is an expensive solution."

"The price is good for the solution and there is a license required."

"Its price is reasonable."

"To compete effectively, Huawei might consider adjusting pricing to align more closely with other competitive brands, particularly those offering lower-cost solutions."

"Its price is very good. This wireless system totally costs about 30,000 euros, and some of the other solutions cost about 45,000 euros. It is a difference of 15,000 euros, which is quite a lot of money."

"It is not monthly. It is a kind of perpetual licensing. We pay once depending on the kind of services we need to deliver. There are no licensing fees."

"We don't have any control on the pricing. This comes from Huawei in India. Pricing-wise, Huawei is very aggressive and competitive if you compare them to competitors, like Cisco, Aruba, and Ruckus. The Indian Huawei team tells us, "Just pick up the order and design the infrastructure. If there are any pricing challenge, we'll work on that and we will try to match things 100 percent.""

"Right now, my company made a one-time purchase of Huawei Wireless. It depends, but in most of the projects where customers buy hardware with some software, it's a one-time purchase. Customers pay a yearly fee for other projects for support and additional software features, such as email protection firmware updates for cybersecurity. You'll also receive information about the latest attacks and get more protection if you pay an additional fee apart from the standard license fee. You'll also get an additional warranty for Huawei Wireless, a yearly contract."

More Huawei Wireless pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Which wireless solution would you choose - Huawei or D-Link?

Huawei wireless is a strong and solid product that has a lot of features - and for all that it offers, it happens to be very cost effective. As a wireless solution, it is simple and its user interf...

See all answers

What do you like most about Huawei Wireless?

The reliability has had a positive impact on our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Huawei Wireless?

For SMB customers with limited wireless users, Huawei Wireless may not be suitable due to the lack of multiple access points and the need for a centralized SSID. However, for large-capacity custome...

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

D-Link Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 16% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 14% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 13% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 3% of the time

More Huawei Wireless Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 16% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

NETGEAR Insight Access Points vs Omada Access Points

Compared 5% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Huawei Wireless

September 2025

Download Huawei Wireless product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

September 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

Huawei WLAN

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Huawei WLAN products are compatible with 802.11a/b/g/n/ac standards to establish high-speed, secure, and reliable wireless network connections for indoor and outdoor applications.WLAN products can be used in enterprise offices, schools, hospitals, large shopping malls, exhibition centers, airports, and more.

Huawei

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Anhui Agricultural University (AAU), China Everbright Bank

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points

September 2025

Free Report: Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.