Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Camunda vs Resolve Actions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Camunda
Ranking in Process Automation
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
77
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (2nd), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st)
Resolve Actions
Ranking in Process Automation
32nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Camunda is 26.2%, down from 27.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Resolve Actions is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewer
Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.
Naresh Rayakwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable platform with a straightforward setup process
The initial setup process is straightforward. It usually takes a day if all the prerequisites are met. It requires correctly configuring the property file. The process is particularly uncomplicated if the deployment is on a standalone system. However, in a clustered environment, the property file needs to be deployed on each server with precise sequencing, following the guidelines provided by the system. The installation script is then executed to install the overall product. The deployment time depends on different use cases and requires one executive to work on it. The level of maintenance support is also based on the use cases. Two executives can easily maintain the product for a simple vanilla setup with normal use cases.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The platform's approach to BPMN modeling is straightforward and versatile, making it easy to adopt and use effectively."
"The flexibility is great."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"The flexibility characteristic in a BPMS, through BPMN and DMN, is undoubtedly the most interesting feature for our business."
"It is a scalable product. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need."
"Camunda seems to have a lot of traction, maturity, and stability. It also matches the need for agile development."
"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."
"The platform allows us to create workflows easily."
 

Cons

"We have faced problems with the performance."
"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation. More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"Currently, the libraries are more specific to a few network equipment providers. They could introduce more libraries from different vendors."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"Its price is decent. Everything is included in the license. The Community version is also good to start with. We are using the Community version."
"The open-source version of the product is free to use."
"We are using the open-source version, free of charge. We didn't bother with the enterprise features."
"The product is expensive for a small or medium-sized company."
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."
"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"
"They offer a subscription-based license and not a perpetual license for the platform. You have to purchase a yearly license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
What do you like most about Resolve Actions?
The platform allows us to create workflows easily.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Resolve Actions?
They offer a subscription-based license and not a perpetual license for the platform. You have to purchase a yearly license.
What needs improvement with Resolve Actions?
Currently, the libraries are more specific to a few network equipment providers. They could introduce more libraries from different vendors.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Camunda BPM
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Amazon 4. Google 5. Apple 6. Facebook 7. Tesla 8. Netflix 9. Adobe 10. Salesforce 11. Oracle 12. Cisco 13. Intel 14. HP 15. Dell 16. Samsung 17. Sony 18. Twitter 19. Uber 20. Airbnb 21. LinkedIn 22. Spotify 23. Pinterest 24. Snapchat 25. Dropbox 26. Slack 27. Square 28. Zoom 29. Shopify 30. Reddit 31. TikTok 32. Lyft
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: June 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.