Camunda vs vCenter Orchestrator comparison

Camunda and Broadcom are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while Broadcom is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0. Camunda holds a 16.3% mindshare in PA, compared to Broadcom’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

20,291 Views
11,566 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

vCenter Orchestrator

Read 51 vCenter Orchestrator reviews

1,068 Views
395 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Camunda

vCenter Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

vCenter Orchestrator and Camunda compete in the workflow automation and business process management category. vCenter Orchestrator has the upper hand in managing virtualized IT environments, while Camunda excels in flexible workflow design and BPMN capabilities.

Features: vCenter Orchestrator is known for virtualization, workflow automation, and integration, offering usability and management tools. Camunda offers strong BPMN capabilities, is open-source, and provides flexibility in workflow design, making it ideal for business process automation.

Room for Improvement: vCenter Orchestrator could improve integration with non-VMware products, reduce costs, and simplify workflows, with additional automation support needed. Camunda users suggest enhancing the user interface, improving native integrations, and providing better documentation and support for non-tech users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: vCenter Orchestrator is often deployed on-premises with generally positive support but concerns about response time exist. Camunda offers cloud and hybrid deployment options, with mixed feedback on enterprise customer service and reliance on community support.

Pricing and ROI: vCenter Orchestrator's pricing is criticized for complexity and high cost, especially after Broadcom's acquisition, but it offers strong ROI for large environments. Camunda is praised for its cost-effective open-source version; however, its enterprise pricing can rise with usage. Camunda's ROI hinges on its enterprise scalability and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. vCenter Orchestrator Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. vCenter Orchestrator

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.1

Camunda delivers cost-effective, stable solutions enhancing productivity, reducing operational expenses, and offering comprehensive process coverage for large enterprises.

Sentiment score

6.0

Medium to large enterprises gain ROI from virtualization, but quantifying returns is challenging; vCenter Orchestrator suits specific needs.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the vCenter Orchestrator report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.3

Camunda's customer service is praised for helpfulness and expertise, though some mention challenges with complexity and regional support.

Sentiment score

6.2

VMware support is praised for communication and resolution but needs faster response and deeper expertise in some cases.

On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate them a 10 for support.

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

They provide better support for the enterprise edition.

VenkatarajuNandam

Technical and Solution Architect at Freelance

For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the vCenter Orchestrator report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

Camunda excels in scalability using modern tools but faces database challenges; improvements are noted in documentation and setup.

Sentiment score

7.3

vCenter Orchestrator effectively scales from small to large environments, adapting well despite some hardware-specific challenges.

Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.

VenkatarajuNandam

Technical and Solution Architect at Freelance

It allows for easy scaling, especially with ECS service configurations.

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

They have that REST layer, REST APIs layer that makes it easy to integrate and make it part of a microservices ecosystem and APIs.

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the vCenter Orchestrator report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.8

Camunda is highly rated for stability, with minimal bugs, and performs efficiently in various production environments even under load.

Sentiment score

7.9

vCenter Orchestrator is highly stable, reliable, and efficient, with occasional issues, praised for trustworthy performance by users.

There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.

VenkatarajuNandam

Technical and Solution Architect at Freelance

We were not really concerned about the performance on the process itself because it was super simple, super straightforward, and it did not present itself as a bottleneck, nor did we feel it was adding additional time in the execution.

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the vCenter Orchestrator report

Room For Improvement

Camunda needs better customization, programming language integration, scalability, and AWS support, with enhanced documentation and performance improvements.

vCenter Orchestrator requires affordability, interface improvements, better integration, automation features, simpler workflows, and accessible support and resources.

Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version.

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.

VenkatarajuNandam

Technical and Solution Architect at Freelance

For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the vCenter Orchestrator report

Setup Cost

Camunda's pricing is competitive, but costly for small businesses; enterprise edition offers advanced features and support options.

Enterprise users have mixed opinions on vCenter Orchestrator pricing, with some finding it expensive due to complex licensing.

For some services, such as hosting databases, Google is really expensive.

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.

VenkatarajuNandam

Technical and Solution Architect at Freelance

For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the vCenter Orchestrator report

Valuable Features

Camunda is valued for its flexibility, open-source customization, user-friendly interface, and effective management of complex processes.

vCenter Orchestrator offers seamless automation, easy integration, scalability, user-friendly interface, and cost-effective virtual machine management.

ECS also allows for horizontal scalability with thresholds that can be configured for CPU or memory.

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Camunda's support for BPMN 2.0 is a great advantage because it allows us to have a common language to discuss technology and business in the same perspective.

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting.

Mohamed Guermazi

Technical Director / Project Manager at I-way

For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the vCenter Orchestrator report

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Process Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (3rd), AI Software Development (2nd), AI Customer Support (8th), AI IT Support (6th)

vCenter Orchestrator

Ranking in Process Automation

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Camunda is 16.3%, down from 27.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of vCenter Orchestrator is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	16.3%
vCenter Orchestrator	0.7%
Other	83.0%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Narendar Bompally

Hybrid Cloud Engineer at RealPage

Boosts operational efficiency with flexible workflows and reliable cluster management

We currently use vCenter Orchestrator's pre-built workflow templates for our IT processes. The templates are flexible, allowing us to create and convert processes simply and manage patches. Regarding integration capabilities, we do not integrate any third-party tools. We exclusively use VMware products. The integration within the VMware infrastructure is limited to Single Sign-On (SSO). I have not created any workflows in vCenter Orchestrator as workflows are only used for change management. I have not encountered any drag and drop interface. The version control and logging features of vCenter Orchestrator have significantly improved the reliability of our automated processes, particularly during upgrades or patching to the cluster-wise. Previously, it would be done on a one-to-one cluster or one-to-one host basis, but now we only need to monitor it for upgrading or patching the entire cluster. I cannot comment on the pricing and licensing of vCenter Orchestrator as these aspects are managed by our onsite counterpart. Overall, I rate vCenter Orchestrator 8 out of 10. The rating reflects occasional delays in support response times and portal stability issues.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about vCenter Orchestrator?

The stability of the product is very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for vCenter Orchestrator?

We're running a low-profile budget. This is not our main focus on investment technology, so we're trying to reduce costs due to the change from perpetual to subscription licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with vCenter Orchestrator?

For our environment, I do not see any areas of vCenter Orchestrator that could be improved or enhanced. We are currently satisfied with the orchestrator. If any improvements are needed, I will prov...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

VMware Cloud Director vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 26% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 25% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 12% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 8% of the time

More vCenter Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

January 2026

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

vCenter Orchestrator

January 2026

Download vCenter Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

Broadcom

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

VMware vCenter Orchestrator simplifies the automation of complex IT tasks and integrates with VMware vCloud Suite components to adapt and extend service delivery and operational management, effectively working with existing infrastructure, tools and processes.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Beiersdorf Shared Services

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. vCenter Orchestrator

December 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. vCenter Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. vCenter Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. vCenter Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.