Carbonite Server vs N2W comparison

OpenText and N2WS are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #57, while N2WS is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.9. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in BRS, compared to N2WS’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N2WS users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

1,779 Views
1,263 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

N2W

Read 20 N2W reviews

1,761 Views
933 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

N2W

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Carbonite Server and N2W compete in the data protection market. Carbonite Server provides strong pricing and support, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions, whereas N2W attracts those seeking robust features and comprehensive recovery options.

Features: Carbonite Server offers seamless integration capabilities, comprehensive recovery options, and efficient data backup. N2W is known for advanced disaster recovery, superior cloud backup functionalities, and high customization options, catering to complex data management needs.

Room for Improvement: Carbonite Server could improve by offering more advanced cloud-based features, greater customization options, and enhanced disaster recovery capabilities. N2W could benefit from simplifying its deployment process, improving cost competitiveness, and expanding platform integration offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Carbonite Server is straightforward to deploy, with responsive customer support making it accessible. N2W, while having efficient deployment and reliable service, demands more in-depth deployment efforts for complex setups but provides thorough assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Carbonite Server offers lower setup costs and good ROI through affordable subscriptions, appealing to those on a budget. N2W requires higher initial investment but offers potentially superior ROI with its extensive features, appealing to those looking for long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. N2W Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. N2W

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

57th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

46th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

N2W

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

8th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

6th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N2W is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
N2W	0.6%
Carbonite Server	0.8%
Other	98.6%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

reviewer2757345

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automation has transformed our backup process and validated our disaster recovery strategy

While the product is excellent, there are a couple of areas for potential improvement. The process for version upgrades, which sometimes requires deploying a new instance, could be streamlined to allow for a more seamless in-place update. It would be extremely useful to have the ability to set a retention period on manual backups. Occasionally, we take a manual snapshot before a major deployment, and currently, these can be forgotten, leading to unnecessary storage costs. Adding an 'auto-delete after X days' option to manual backups, similar to scheduled policies, would be a fantastic addition for cost management and general housekeeping. The EKS backup module should be a great feature, and it would have been a useful functionality to have for cluster backup management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"The solution is very stable."

More Carbonite Server pros

"The backup and restore functionality is very easy to use and manage."

"The ability to recover instances or volumes within minutes has improved our RTOs dramatically."

"The product is successful with the SMB market."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."

"N2W has positively impacted our organization by assisting us in areas of cost savings when compared to other tools available, and it has also given us an extra layer of protection."

"The backup and recovery are the most valuable features. So, our developers can work with confidence."

"The initial setup is easy."

"We had a ransomware event in 2023, and we were able to recover every machine with minimal effort."

More N2W pros

Cons

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"One area where we would appreciate improvement is support for additional AWS native services, such as Lambda function backups and S3 beyond archive."

"Improved disaster recovery options and expanded multicloud support are two areas where N2WS has already made significant advancements in the latest version."

"It could be improved to include disaster recovery in cross accounts for Azure in upcoming releases."

"S3 backups, which I know is already in the feature pipeline, would be a useful improvement."

"More documentation would be helpful, especially some step-by-step documents for recovery scenarios."

"The solution has the option to take backup on-prem servers, but it's not very efficient."

"Additional features I would like to see are the ability to restore to different vendors, AWS and Azure, and/or the ability or take the information out of the AWS cloud."

"There is room for improvement in stability."

More N2W cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"Its price is reasonable."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The solution is open source."

"The pricing and licensing on AWS is fine, because you can do it for smaller tiers depending on your number of instances, so it's not that scary."

"It's very economical and worth the cost."

"It has very good pricing per instance and comes with three options, for both small and large environments, to fit your needs."

"The price is not cheap, nor is it costly."

"The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace is easy. Just click the button."

"AWS adds more features and offer things for free, or cheaply. Therefore, we will be evaluating AWS Data Lifecycle Manager, because it will probably do backups. Thus, make sure the product that you are using is competitive or adds more value than AWS."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Government

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is smooth, as I have not faced any issues while spinning up the instance from the marketplace, and the documentation is very comprehensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N2WS Backup & Recovery?

The EKS environment solution could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

Backup and snapshots. Before implementing a dedicated cloud-native solution, our primary pain point was the fragmented and manual nature of our data protection strategy. We were relying on a patchw...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 13% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 8% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

AWS Backup vs N2W

Compared 17% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs N2W

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Backup vs N2W

Compared 9% of the time

Clumio vs N2W

Compared 8% of the time

Druva Phoenix vs N2W

Compared 6% of the time

More N2W Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

January 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

N2W

January 2026

Download N2W product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

N2WS Backup & Recovery, N2WS Cloud Protection Manager, N2W Backup & Recovery for AWS Free Trial/BYOL

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

OpenText

N2WS

Overview

Carbonite Server securely replicates data to the local backup server while securing a second copy in the cloud. Granular restore and local failover options ensure rapid recovery and minimal data loss. With integrated hardware and cloud failover for critical systems, Carbonite Server provides reliable data protection.

OpenText

N2W offers a cloud-native backup and recovery platform tailored for AWS and Azure environments, delivering secure and rapid data protection.

N2W enables IT teams to effortlessly manage backup and restore processes within AWS and Azure environments. By leveraging policy-based management, users gain full control over rapid, secure recovery across regions and accounts. Designed to scale with workloads of any size, N2W ensures business continuity through features like immutable ransomware-protected backups and smart data lifecycle management. Hosted directly in the cloud account, it simplifies the protection and recovery of mission-critical applications.

What are N2W's key features?

Immutable Backups: Protects against ransomware with unchangeable data versions
Fast Recovery: Ensures rapid data restoration within seconds
Policy-Based Management: Automates backup processes for efficiency
Cost Savings: Optimizes storage with smart data lifecycle management
Granular Reporting: Offers detailed compliance-ready audit trails
Seamless Archival: Supports low-cost storage integration including Wasabi

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simple management for quick data recovery
Automation: Reduces manual intervention with automated policies
Cost Optimization: Manages storage efficiently to save costs
Business Continuity: Ensures resilience with flexible scheduling

Organizations across sectors use N2W for automated backup and disaster recovery of AWS resources like EC2 instances and RDS databases. It's employed to manage schedules, streamline backups in production settings, and rely on S3 for storage, providing a robust data protection approach.

N2WS

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Deloitte, NASA, Johnson & Johnson, Dyson, Deuthsche Bahn, Skechers, Allan Gray, Hewlett Packard, St. John's University, City of Oakland

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. N2W

December 2025

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. N2W

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. N2W and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. N2W report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.