Catalogic DPX vs Rubrik comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Catalogic and Rubrik are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Catalogic is ranked #78, while Rubrik is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7. Catalogic holds a 0.5% mindshare in BRS, compared to Rubrik’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Rubrik users are willing to recommend the solution.

Catalogic DPX

Read 2 Catalogic DPX reviews

1,731 Views
1,644 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Rubrik

Read 96 Rubrik reviews

21,991 Views
15,614 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Catalogic DPX

Rubrik

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Catalogic DPX and Rubrik are two prominent options in the data protection and management space. Catalogic DPX is favored for its pricing and support, but Rubrik is recognized for its superior features and is viewed as worth the higher cost.

Features: Catalogic DPX users value its comprehensive backup and recovery capabilities, integration with existing infrastructure, and pricing advantages. Rubrik is noted for its advanced automation, cloud integration, and scalable architecture. Rubrik's modern approach to data protection is seen as more valuable by users.

Room for Improvement: Catalogic DPX users suggest improvements in reporting and analytics, and a more intuitive management system. Rubrik users desire more competitive pricing and better support for legacy systems. These areas highlight Catalogic DPX's management complexity versus Rubrik's higher cost and less extensive legacy support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catalogic DPX is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and robust customer service. Rubrik is also noted for ease of deployment and receives high marks for its comprehensive onboarding process and ongoing support. Both products perform well in deployment, but Rubrik's customer service edges out slightly ahead.

Pricing and ROI: Catalogic DPX has lower setup costs and quicker returns on investment, making it a budget-friendly option. Rubrik's pricing is higher but justified by its advanced feature set and long-term savings through operational efficiencies. Users generally see Rubrik as a more cost-effective solution over time despite its initial higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catalogic DPX

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

78th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rubrik

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (6th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Catalogic DPX is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rubrik is 3.0%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Rubrik	3.0%
Catalogic DPX	0.5%
Other	96.5%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

it_user292722

Data Center Global SAP Operations Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

We use it to backup some high output critical physical servers, knowing that in case of disaster we could still recover to our VM environment. The user interface needs improvement.

The user interface needs improvement, the selection boxes to select a backup job are very small not adequate for managing 400+ backup jobs, we only see 8 job names in the small scroll window. The scheduler features are lacking, we must edit backup specs to reach the option to change the schedule. The new reporting feature has greatly improved the product, prior to this it was very difficult to have a full view of our backup schedules when scheduling a new job. Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix. We still see a lot of value in the product, but hope that the next few updates will not cause more issues... We wanted a mission critical enterprise solution, and sincerely hope that the future upgrades will bring the product back on track.

Read full review

reviewer2588997

Senior Technical Support Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Reliable automated backups have protected critical databases and simplified recoveries for our operations

Portal identity management should improve. We end up losing people's identity, which was not sufficient enough to read the events. That was the only place I could see for improvement. They keep changing the layouts and descriptions, giving the user confusion if they have not used it for maybe three months. When they come back, the interface is changed. They lost the legacy support, and it is not consistent. Some of the options for the restore give a very hard time for the engineer if they come back after three months to use it because the phrases have changed completely. That is why they were not able to select whether they should select this option or should select another option. Where it comes from, the documentation we gave them does not match anymore. That was a challenge.My consultation part was about how to integrate the technology with each other for the platform or storage or database. I did not deal with any price metrics or scaling the storage. I have no idea about the pricing part. I never joined any meetings or any documents to disclose the pricing. It was quite good in general. Recently, in March 2025, they did a new update which enabled them to update their agents remotely and built in, in-place mode. That is bringing the cybersecurity perspective. That was a big challenge. I said it is a challenge, but I do not know because I left the company, so I am not sure if cybersecurity addressed the solution. Rubrik support is usually very accommodating and very flexible. I am not sure, but the last challenge I saw was that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"By implementing an OVF (docker based) and without any agents on your servers, you’ll get a system which provides you with: Orchestration, Automation DR and Data analytics."

"Catalogic has great features including the ability to P2V from snapvaults, and recently the addition of agent-less backups for Linux."

"The web interface is user-friendly, clean, and it provides a good summary of what you're protecting at a glance."

"Overall the product is really good."

"Rubrik's automation has really impacted my operations positively by providing smooth automation for most backup and recovery tasks."

"There is a lot of flexibility in how it can be deployed, and where their data can be backed up (i.e. on-premise or in the cloud)."

"CloudOn allows for backed up virtual machines stored offsite in Azure to be instantiated as an Azure virtual machine and spun up."

"I no longer feel the need to babysit and monitor all of the backup jobs in the backup system."

"Live Mount is where we do the majority of our big recoveries, unless it is a file recovery. A file recovery takes a few minutes to restore to where the file in the event a file was accidentally deleted by a user, etc. There has been at least a 90 percent reduction in recovery time based on our previous solution, from the need to recover something to when it's actually recovered went from hours to minutes."

"Even though I am not trained for implementing, it is easy to use and easy to learn."

More Rubrik pros

Cons

"And hearing about all these awesome posibilities, it kind of struck me that this was only possible with NetApp storage."

"Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix."

"There could be better reporting and better filtering."

"If there was something that we could get Rubrik to fix, it would be when our DBS takes snapshots of a server or the database, the replication doesn't kick off fast enough. They can't remote it to the peer site and manipulate it back up in order to move it over, take a copy of production, slap it over, and test it out. As I understand, they are working on it. Replication works. We also get spoiled by how good things are now. We get to a point where it is so easy but when something isn't instant gratification, it seems that everything else is so amazing, why isn't this right?"

"Rubrik can only leverage cloud storage for archiving and has no cloud failover."

"Capacity reports could definitely be improved. It's hard to determine what is using the space and why. For instance, you can see that some host is using 2 TB on the Rubrik node and the disk space on that host is 400 GBs. It's hard to explain how there can be 2 TBs of data on local storage when nothing has changed on the host for the past three days."

"It needs more storage array integration options and an easier restore for files that download using a browser."

"Needs integration with video CD (coming in the next release) and a multi-tenant GUI."

"I have a personal want which might not necessarily make sense with Rubrik as a company or Rubrik as a software, but it would be really nice if they could also handle things like item-level backups and restores of Active Directory objects and DNS and DCP objects."

"Its reporting can be improved. Sometimes, I need to create reports to know whether something is available or not, how much frontend data is being protected, etc. Rubrik gives a lot of things in the report, which can be confusing. It isn't very easy to get reports. It shows all the backup, index, replication, and everything else in one report. So, I have to export, filter, and then do the calculations."

More Rubrik cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Rubrik is quite expensive for small businesses."

"As a technical person, I don't have the details, but from what I have heard, it can be expensive."

"The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution."

"Some people say it is expensive, but you get what you pay for. If you want a Maserati, you have to pay for it. If you want to buy a Porsche, you have to pay for it."

"There are additional costs like maintenance, and there are some features on their central management piece that don't come with our licensing."

"Rubrik's competitive pricing and strong return on investment make it a compelling choice, especially compared to alternatives like Data Domain and Avamar. Commvault was considered but deemed too expensive."

"It is an expensive product."

"We pay yearly and it's based on the number of bricks."

More Rubrik pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	56

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which would you choose - Rubrik or Veeam Backup & Replication?

Veeam Backup & Replication provides an easy-to-set-up solution to the issue of data storage and recovery. Setting it up is a relatively simple affair. For the most part it prompts you from scre...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rubrik?

It's easy to manage and has an innovated solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rubrik?

Regarding pricing, Rubrik is a costly solution, and I would rate it an eight.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 7% of the time

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 7% of the time

N2W vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 2% of the time

More Catalogic DPX Competitors

Commvault Cloud vs Rubrik

Compared 9% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs Rubrik

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Rubrik

Compared 6% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Rubrik

Compared 3% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Rubrik

Compared 3% of the time

More Rubrik Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

September 2026

Download Catalogic DPX product report

Buyer's Guide

Rubrik

September 2026

Download Rubrik product report

Also Known As

BEX

No data available

Overview

Catalogic DPX offers a robust data protection solution aimed at optimizing backup and recovery processes with efficiency and reliability. Designed to cater to complex IT environments, it ensures seamless data management and protection capabilities.

Intended for enterprises seeking comprehensive data protection, Catalogic DPX delivers advanced features for backup, recovery, and management of data across multiple platforms. The capacity to integrate seamlessly with current systems enhances its functionality, providing users with flexible, scalable solutions that accommodate dynamic business needs. This adaptability is critical in maintaining data integrity and agility in complex IT frameworks.

What are the most important features of Catalogic DPX?

Backup and Restore: Provides fast, reliable backup and restoration options.
Snapshot Management: Integrates with storage arrays for instant access to snapshots.
Replication: Ensures data availability through efficient data replication technologies.
Deduplication: Reduces storage requirements through advanced deduplication techniques.
Ransomware Protection: Offers robust security measures against ransomware threats.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines backup processes, reducing time and labor.
Cost Savings: Minimizes expenses related to storage and recovery operations.
Scalability: Adapts to growing IT demands without compromising performance.
Data Security: Ensures high standards of data protection across environments.

Businesses in industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing implement Catalogic DPX to manage vast amounts of critical data with ease. Its deployment supports compliance with industry-specific regulations, ensuring secure and efficient data handling tailored to unique business requirements.

Catalogic

Rubrik offers instant recovery and intuitive web interface for seamless data backup in cloud and on-premises environments. It prioritizes security with features like ransomware detection and immutable backups, supporting platforms such as VMware and Oracle for effective disaster recovery.

Rubrik is recognized for its automation capabilities, facilitating SLA management and policy integration. Its API-centric architecture allows for extensive customization and seamless integration. Robust security measures, including ransomware protection, enhance data integrity. Organizations benefit from features like Live Mount and CloudOut, which support rapid data recovery across various environments. Despite its strengths, improvements in integration for complex systems, advanced reporting, and pricing competitiveness are necessary.

What are Rubrik's key features?

Instant Recovery: Restores virtual machines and databases in seconds.
Intuitive Interface: Streamlines user interaction for ease of use.
Automation: Enables seamless SLA management and policy integration.
API-Centric Design: Facilitates customization and integration.
Robust Security: Offers ransomware detection and immutable backups.
Archival Functionality: Manages data storage efficiently, optimizing costs.

What benefits should you look for in reviews?

Data Protection: Confidence in data integrity and ransomware security.
Cost Optimization: Efficient data storage management reduces expenses.
Rapid Recovery: Swift restoration capabilities minimize downtime.
Regulatory Compliance: Supports adherence to data protection standards.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Rubrik's implementation ensures critical data is safeguarded against threats while enabling rapid backups and recovery. By supporting platforms like VMware and Microsoft, it aids in sustaining operational continuity, meeting compliance requirements, and managing long-term data storage efficiently.

Rubrik

Sample Customers

Hendrick Medical, CommonFund, Red-8, Fairfax County Schools, Tectrade, Storage Assessments

Driscoll's, Red Hawk Casino, Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP, Wabash National, Chateau Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, Galliker Transport & Logistics

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.