Catalogic DPX vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Catalogic and Mimecast solutions aren't in the same category. Catalogic is ranked #78 in BRS , and holds a 0.5% mindshare in the category. Mimecast is ranked #3 in DLP , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution.

Catalogic DPX

Read 2 Catalogic DPX reviews

1,952 Views
1,854 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...

Read 97 Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection reviews

11,966 Views
6,462 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Catalogic DPX

Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Catalogic DPX and Code42 Incydr compete in the data protection and recovery software category. Code42 Incydr appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, despite its higher cost.

Features: Catalogic DPX offers robust backup and recovery capabilities, highly reliable services, and competitive pricing. Code42 Incydr provides comprehensive data protection, advanced threat detection features, and a feature-rich environment that enhances security measures.

Room for Improvement: Catalogic DPX could improve reporting functionalities, accelerate performance, and enhance system efficiency. Code42 Incydr would benefit from better integration options, providing more granular control over security policies, and streamlining the user interface to enhance usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catalogic DPX is known for its straightforward setup and highly responsive customer service, assisting significantly during deployment. Code42 Incydr, despite good customer support, has a more complex deployment process requiring additional resources.

Pricing and ROI: Catalogic DPX is cost-effective, offering lower setup costs and strong ROI. Code42 Incydr is more expensive but delivers higher ROI through its advanced security features, making it ideal for buyers prioritizing security.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catalogic DPX

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (78th)

Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

Catalogic DPX and Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Catalogic DPX is designed for Backup and Recovery and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, up 0.4% compared to last year.
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection, on the other hand, focuses on Data Loss Prevention (DLP), holds 2.8% mindshare, up 2.1% since last year.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Catalogic DPX	0.5%
Veeam Data Platform	5.6%
Commvault Cloud	3.2%
Other	90.7%

Backup and Recovery

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection	2.8%
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	5.5%
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention	4.2%
Other	87.5%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

it_user292722

Data Center Global SAP Operations Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

We use it to backup some high output critical physical servers, knowing that in case of disaster we could still recover to our VM environment. The user interface needs improvement.

The user interface needs improvement, the selection boxes to select a backup job are very small not adequate for managing 400+ backup jobs, we only see 8 job names in the small scroll window. The scheduler features are lacking, we must edit backup specs to reach the option to change the schedule. The new reporting feature has greatly improved the product, prior to this it was very difficult to have a full view of our backup schedules when scheduling a new job. Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix. We still see a lot of value in the product, but hope that the next few updates will not cause more issues... We wanted a mission critical enterprise solution, and sincerely hope that the future upgrades will bring the product back on track.

Read full review

External Ganesh

Security Engineer at Comcast

Insider threats have been detected faster and internal data exposure is now controlled

Regarding how Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection can be improved, sometimes the tool is slightly laggy, wherein it would take some time for us to fetch the related logs from the Mimecast portal, and that of course can be improved. There could also be a graph or a kind of a graph where, if the organization has a smaller number of employees, it is fine, but if it has a large number of employees and different departments, then in that case, Mimecast could give us an AI suggestion upon how to improvise the current security posture, how we stand and where we can go up to in terms of implementing or tweaking the policies. As the organization's size gets bigger, it would also be better if Mimecast could provide some solutions upon how to segregate the users into groups and what groups can have which policies. Those kinds of features can be added. Regarding Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security could improve as I am not entirely sure how it works. It would be helpful if Mimecast could, as the AI capabilities are in place, maintain a strict governance policy upon the data that is being processed, especially for user personally identifiable information. As insider risk management sometimes also gets into the personal details of the user, organizations might be hesitant; even we are also hesitant to use the AI capabilities. If Mimecast could provide more information about how they store the data and whether the agents are local agents or cloud-hosted agents, that would be of great help for the organizations to consider its AI capabilities while adhering to the compliance needs of a particular organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Catalogic has great features including the ability to P2V from snapvaults, and recently the addition of agent-less backups for Linux."

"By implementing an OVF (docker based) and without any agents on your servers, you’ll get a system which provides you with: Orchestration, Automation DR and Data analytics."

"It had the ability to preseed by sending in a data drive and could restore by sending the user a data drive."

"Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection offers several best features, including being a very user-friendly tool where we can easily create policies, add or remove users, and block sender addresses or links, making it very useful for email protection."

"Without Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection, your mail communication is not safe, and there is no one monitoring your communication."

"We are now able to keep our corporate data safe for those who don't work in a center with IT support."

"Having an enterprise backup solution in place instead of relying on odd one-off solutions, such as time machine, easily saves $20,000+ in desktop support and admin time a year."

"We are so very thankful for the stability and reliability that Code42's CrashPlan offers us."

"Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection has positively impacted my organization by enabling investigation of risk behavior and user behavior, reducing potential data leakages, improving awareness of sensitive data handling across users, strengthening compliance with internal policies and regulatory requirements, and streamlining incident investigation through centralized case management."

"The best part of CrashPlan is that it just works; it's a solid, well-written product with great support that gives users a sense of security about the data that keeps the business working."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection pros

Cons

"Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix."

"And hearing about all these awesome posibilities, it kind of struck me that this was only possible with NetApp storage."

"Since the product works in the background and, so far, has been able to restore multiple versions of files, I don't see any need for improvement."

"Other than licensing issues and limited amount of data storage, but that is expected with scaling."

"Our client has chosen Proofpoint over Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection because they are highly recommended to the Proofpoint solution rather than Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection."

"Even with the constant improvements coming quarterly, I would definitely appreciate the night mode in the administrator console to be brought back."

"They could always reduce the price."

"This is my only major issue with Code42 at this point."

"Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection's customer support was good overall, but sometimes we did not receive timely responses, needing to wait two to three days for updates."

"Download speeds could be faster when restoring from the cloud."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

20%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	30
Large Enterprise	44

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Code42 Next-Gen DLP?

I am unsure about Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection's pricing, setup costs, and licensing details. However, I know that licensing details are user-specific according to the licen...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Code42 Next-Gen DLP?

My advice for those looking at Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is to compare your use case comprehensively. Do not just rely on reviews, as they offer communal insight; evaluat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Code42 Incydr?

A con to mention is that Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection, at times, may not capture everything. For instance, the time that Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 8% of the time

Bacula Enterprise vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 5% of the time

Veritas NetBackup Appliance vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 4% of the time

More Catalogic DPX Competitors

Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 9% of the time

NetVault Plus vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Teramind vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

October 2026

Download Catalogic DPX product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

October 2026

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection report

Download Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection product report

Also Known As

BEX

Mimecast Incydr, Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

Overview

Catalogic DPX offers a robust data protection solution aimed at optimizing backup and recovery processes with efficiency and reliability. Designed to cater to complex IT environments, it ensures seamless data management and protection capabilities.

Intended for enterprises seeking comprehensive data protection, Catalogic DPX delivers advanced features for backup, recovery, and management of data across multiple platforms. The capacity to integrate seamlessly with current systems enhances its functionality, providing users with flexible, scalable solutions that accommodate dynamic business needs. This adaptability is critical in maintaining data integrity and agility in complex IT frameworks.

What are the most important features of Catalogic DPX?

Backup and Restore: Provides fast, reliable backup and restoration options.
Snapshot Management: Integrates with storage arrays for instant access to snapshots.
Replication: Ensures data availability through efficient data replication technologies.
Deduplication: Reduces storage requirements through advanced deduplication techniques.
Ransomware Protection: Offers robust security measures against ransomware threats.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines backup processes, reducing time and labor.
Cost Savings: Minimizes expenses related to storage and recovery operations.
Scalability: Adapts to growing IT demands without compromising performance.
Data Security: Ensures high standards of data protection across environments.

Businesses in industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing implement Catalogic DPX to manage vast amounts of critical data with ease. Its deployment supports compliance with industry-specific regulations, ensuring secure and efficient data handling tailored to unique business requirements.

Catalogic

Mimecast Incydr protects organizations against insider risk and data exfiltration, whether accidental, negligent, or malicious. It monitors endpoint, cloud, browser, and email activity to see when files move to places you don't trust, without requiring policies, proxies, or content classification to work. Administrators get a single dashboard for data flow visibility, adaptive controls ranging from education to blocking, and integrations with HR, endpoint detection, and identity systems to automate response as risk changes.

What key features should users explore?

Shadow AI Visibility: Sees uploads, pastes, and prompts into GenAI tools like ChatGPT and Claude across endpoint and browser, with no policies required.
Adaptive Controls: Applies the right level of protection per user and scenario, from in-the-moment education (Instructor) to real-time blocking of paste, uploads, or removable media.
Departing Employee Monitoring: Automatically watchlists offboarding employees through HCM integrations (Workday, BambooHR, and others) the moment HR confirms departure.
Risk Prioritization (PRISM): Prioritizes incidents using hundreds of risk indicators based on data sensitivity, user behavior, and destination.
Block by Source/Destination: Blocks sensitive data (source code, financial systems, HR data) from reaching unsanctioned destinations, without writing regex-based policies.

What benefits can impact ROI?

Faster Investigation: Reduces time to investigate high-risk incidents by 50%, verified by Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) research.
Low Administrative Overhead: Half of customers spend less than 4 hours a week on administration, without dedicated headcount.
Proven Return: 172% ROI and under 6-month payback, independently verified by Forrester TEI.
Automated Offboarding Security: HCM integrations remove manual handoffs between HR and security during the highest-risk period of employment.
Reduced Tool Sprawl: Combines DLP, CASB, and UEBA-style visibility in a single lightweight endpoint agent.

Industries and use cases

Mimecast Incydr is used across industries to address insider risk, departing employee data theft, and shadow AI exposure. Enterprises use it to monitor data movement across endpoint, cloud, and browser channels, automate watchlisting during employee offboarding, and gain visibility into how employees and AI tools interact with sensitive data, supporting both security operations and compliance requirements in regulated industries.

Mimecast

Sample Customers

Hendrick Medical, CommonFund, Red-8, Fairfax County Schools, Tectrade, Storage Assessments

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.