Centreon vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Centreon and Instana are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Centreon is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.7, while Instana is ranked #67. Centreon holds a 1.5% mindshare in IM, compared to Instana’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Instana users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,143 Views
6,400 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Read 2 Instana Infrastructure Monitoring reviews

2,479 Views
1,958 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and Instana Infrastructure Monitoring compete in the infrastructure monitoring space. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring holds the upper hand with its robust features and advanced automation, potentially outweighing Centreon's cost benefits.

Features: Centreon offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, strong customization options, and a focus on user-defined adjustments. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring provides advanced automation, AI-driven insights, real-time data analytics, and forecasting with sophisticated data processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon has a straightforward deployment process, supported by community and extensive documentation for quick implementations. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring offers streamlined installation with strong professional support and guided onboarding, emphasizing automation and real-time assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon provides lower entry costs with a transparent pricing model, ensuring excellent value. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring requires a higher initial investment but delivers substantial ROI through enhanced operational efficiency and advanced features, making it a cost-effective solution for long-term gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,262 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

25th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (22nd)

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

67th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

40th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.5%
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring	0.7%
Other	97.8%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Hakimuddin Ronaque

Assistant Manager at Lauren Information Technologies Pvt Ltd

Has the capability to automatically integrate with a large number of products

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. I have not worked much on other technologies, like SAP or VMware's virtualization part, on-prem infrastructure, or cloud infrastructure. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is so fast and easy to adapt that it works fine. I have not explored other operating systems or infrastructure solutions because my company doesn't have that customer scale. Most of our customers are on-prem or on AWS or Azure, but Instana Infrastructure Monitoring adapts to their infrastructure very well. My company came to know how well Instana Infrastructure Monitoring adapts to our customers' infrastructures when we take care of the PoC phase. Around 12 to 15 people in my company use the product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the remote server functionality on some customer sites, because you can see an independent view and are not dependent on a single connection. If you have branch offices or bigger office outside your headquarters, you can use remote servers because if the connection is broken or disrupted, then remote server will obtain a view of your environment and server availability. This is a good point against using other solutions. Because with other solutions, you don't have this feature. Then, you will be blind if you have this type of a situation."

"I really like the filtering capabilities of it. You can easily tell what's critical next to what's okay, the state of the services. It's very easy to get the whole picture quickly."

"We have all our tickets inside Centreon in real-time and can monitor a lot of ELP and CLN in real-time for application purposes."

"The downtimes feature is helpful. If the ISP is doing some maintenance on its network, we have the option to put downtime on the devices or the services, so we won't get any false alarms."

"We can proactively see what is going on in the network, so most of the time we notice problems before our customers do."

"I can't point to one valuable feature. All of Centreon is good."

"Centreon helps me detect where the problem is quickly. When we resolve a problem quickly, this lowers our overall costs."

"Centreon's most valuable features are preventative maintenance and cost-efficiency. Everything is monitored, and we get a log before the system fails. We have an opportunity to fix the issue and avoid downtime."

More Centreon pros

"The product's initial setup is easy."

"The product is easy to deploy."

Cons

"I went through a few things with them to do with Centreon MAP, to do with active polygons, being able to draw an area and make that active. The functionality was in the older version of Centreon MAP and in the new version, which was a complete rewrite, they dropped it."

"There are times when we face issues with Centreon being in development mode. Sometimes we do not receive alerts, causing business impact, and users ask why no alerts were received."

"Response times can be slow, often leaving us to resolve basic issues in-house."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems."

"Centreon needs to improve the granularity of the data as well as the graphical data. It would also be better to if there was improvement to the filtering/grouping system as well as the creation of views."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems. It already exists for some of them. For example, the Stream Connector is something we use to populate data in another system. This kind of facility for connecting should exist for all products that it makes sense to have connected to a monitoring solution."

"Centreon is very bad with auto-scanning. It's very monolithic software. It doesn't have microservices and it only has basic clustering. You cannot, for example, have six or seven nodes for Centreon's cloud processes."

"Centreon introduced network discovery in the most recent update. However, it doesn't work well. Our previous monitoring tool could discover networking equipment on the network and identify the relationships between the devices."

More Centreon cons

"Instana Infrastructure Monitoring needs to support monitoring of the .NET framework since it is one of the areas where the solution currently has shortcomings."

"The product’s scalability is an area with certain limitations, making it an area where improvements are required."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Their licensing model is really easy. You have one license and you have access to all the features, compared to other tools where you have to purchase add-ons."

"The pricing is acceptable."

"The pricing works out well for us, given our environment and where we are."

"The solution has a free part and after that threshold, you will need to pay. For example, if you believe you can create an interesting map, most of the time, you will have to pay 10,000 Euros per year for having access to these components."

"The pricing starts at around 5000 euro. However, this depends on: Your environment, the size of your host, how many hosts you have, how many remote pollers you have, and if you want to use the Monitoring Business Intelligence or Centreon MAP functionalities."

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"It's quite expensive when you use the Enterprise version, but if you compare it to other providers, it's more like a middle-of-the-line product. It's always good to have a price that is lower, but I would say the price is okay because we get very good support and if we have any other issues we can always contact them. There has never been a time when I didn't get help from them."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"The cost of the tool is around 130 USD per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Zabbix vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 10% of the time

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 10% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

Virtana Platform vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

More Instana Infrastructure Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

September 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

August 2026

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring report

Download Instana Infrastructure Monitoring product report

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring offers a robust solution designed to monitor the performance and health of complex IT environments. Its automated capabilities allow for real-time insights, helping users optimize their infrastructure systems efficiently, maintaining uptime and reliability.

The platform provides comprehensive visibility across distributed systems, facilitating data-driven decisions through its seamless integration and easy deployment. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring supports hybrid and cloud infrastructures, giving teams the control they need to ensure service availability and performance through sophisticated analytics and diagnostics tools. Its real-time alert capabilities and root cause analysis enable users to address issues proactively, minimizing downtime.

What features stand out in Instana Infrastructure Monitoring?

Automated Discovery: Identifies and maps applications within IT infrastructure automatically.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant insight into application performance and health.
AI-Driven Analytics: Delivers actionable insights based on intelligent data analysis.
Root Cause Analysis: Quickly identifies and pinpoints issues impacting system performance.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring processes, reducing manual efforts.
Improved Uptime: Helps maintain high service availability and fast issue resolution.
Enhanced Insights: Leverages data to offer deep learning about system behaviors.
Cost Optimizations: Identifies performance bottlenecks, optimizing resource utilization.

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is implemented across various sectors, including finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. Its ability to adapt to specific industry requirements makes it a valuable tool for operations needing consistent system performance and real-time visibility into their infrastructure health, fostering innovation and operational excellence.

Instana

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

booxware, drivenow, scopevisio, enevo, TimoCom, mobitech

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

September 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.