Check Point DDoS Protector vs Imperva Application Security Platform comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Imperva are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Imperva is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 1.0% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Imperva’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Imperva users who would recommend it.

Check Point DDoS Protector

Read 12 Check Point DDoS Protector reviews

604 Views
604 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Imperva Application Securit...

Read 133 Imperva Application Security Platform reviews

9,706 Views
3,106 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Check Point DDoS Protector

Imperva Application Securit...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Imperva Application Security Platform and Check Point DDoS Protector are contenders in the application security and DDoS mitigation market. Imperva seems to have the upper hand due to broader functionalities and customization options.

Features: Imperva Application Security Platform includes strong DDoS and web application firewall capabilities, threat radar, virtual patching, analytics, and bot management. It is user-friendly and offers comprehensive tools for application security. Check Point DDoS Protector provides real-time detection and mitigation, powered by machine learning and behavior analytics. It also includes anti-DDoS, network behavior analysis, and SSL attack protection modules.

Room for Improvement: Imperva users call for better customer support, more granular policy management, enhanced reporting, caching rules, and user interfaces. There's also a need for increased visibility and integration with other tools. Check Point users seek a simpler interface, detailed real-time traffic analytics, and improved multilingual support and reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva Application Security Platform offers flexible deployment options in public, hybrid clouds, and on-premises. Users commend its straightforward deployments with detailed guidance and responsive customer service. Check Point DDoS Protector also provides similar deployment flexibility but has mixed reviews regarding customer support and response times, noting room for localized support improvement.

Pricing and ROI: Imperva is considered cost-effective, with its upfront cost balanced by strong ROI from its comprehensive security features, and provides good protection value and compliance. Check Point DDoS Protector is viewed as expensive, though users justify the cost with its robust real-time protection capabilities, although smaller organizations find pricing a challenge.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point DDoS Protector vs. Imperva Application Security Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point DDoS Protector vs. Imperva Application Security Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point DDoS Protector

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Imperva Application Securit...

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

133

Ranking in other categories

CDN (4th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (4th), Bot Management (1st), API Security (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of Check Point DDoS Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Imperva Application Security Platform is 7.8%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Imperva Application Security Platform	7.8%
Check Point DDoS Protector	1.0%
Other	91.2%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

reviewer2753559

Cyber Security Solution Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Ensures service availability and handles attacks effectively though initial setup needs expertise

The best features that Check Point DDoS Protector offers, which stand out to me the most, are real-time detection and mitigation of application-layer DDoS attacks, easy integration with the existing Check Point security infrastructure, and low latency protection that does not disrupt legitimate traffic. The centralized console makes it easy to manage policy across devices, and the integration is straightforward since it works seamlessly with Check Point firewall and management and other security products. Check Point DDoS Protector has positively impacted my organization by improving uptime, reducing incidents, and providing cost savings. It will reduce the incidents up to 30%.

Read full review

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Solution ensures website availability and proactive threat mitigation

Over the seven years, the most valuable features of Imperva DDoS that I have found are related to DDoS attacks, which are a group of attacks, and not all of them can be resolved on the endpoint level before the website. Using the web firewall before the website is a common use case to protect against malicious requests to the website. I have utilized Imperva's Intelligent Traffic Filtering feature. This feature helps me understand how the attack is progressing and what is happening inside the requests to our website. It allows me to granularly grant or deny access to certain parts of our website. This helps when we know our customers and the types of requests that can be sent from them, enabling us to block some malicious requests. Imperva DDoS has User Behavior Analytics and Threat Intelligence on its board, and this helps us to be protected proactively. Imperva DDoS connects to its database of threats, storing whole information about attacks all over the world in one simple engine. Everyone can use this feature, which can connect to this engine and get information about what is going on at the world level. That is the way to be protected at the company's level. The integration capabilities of Imperva DDoS are very easy and simple. We can run it in 2 hours.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Check Point DDoS Protector has positively impacted my organization by improving uptime, reducing incidents, and providing cost savings."

"This product uses auto-learning and behavioral analysis to establish baselines for legitimate traffic, and automatically detects and blocks traffic behavior that does not conform."

"The is a really low level of the false-positive alerts (when the clean traffic is marked as DDoS) due to some advanced techniques used by Check Point under the hood."

"One of its most outstanding functions is the zero-day DDOS."

"It can be deployed as a hardware appliance, virtual appliance, or as a cloud service."

"Check Point detects and automatically mitigates attacks, which helps our organization protect our infrastructure."

"It uses several layers of security."

"From my experience, the best part of this solution is behavioral DDoS protection. The DDoS Protector can monitor the traffic, and based on the behavior, it can decide which traffic is malicious and which traffic is regular. It works dynamically, and it's a very good solution."

More Check Point DDoS Protector pros

"We have peace of mind that nobody will use malware on us or try to hack our website."

"It is an effective threat mitigation tool."

"Its unique interface for managing security performance and ease of use are the most valuable features of this solution."

"Very intuitive and granular configuration - It does not require much time, or advanced knowledge, for configuration and maintenance."

"The most valuable feature of Imperva, in addition to its strong knowledge base, is its effective protection for web applications."

"We use Imperva DDoS to stop DDoS attacks and reduce the amount of unwanted queries against web services or web scraping."

"The tool's profiling feature maps all the web application directories and related components on the profile directory. It has improved the security of my client's website applications."

"If you are using the appliance as opposed to the virtual deployment, it can stand as the network layer-two and provide real transparency."

More Imperva Application Security Platform pros

Cons

"The mitigation part could be improved."

"For a long time, there was no software version of R80.10 available for the Check Point DDoS Protector software appliances, and we had to stay on the quite outdated R77.30 version."

"Check Point should develop a DDoS solution because they don't have one and we need to use another solution, in our case, Imperva. This is a problem because we need to have two firewalls. We would like to only have one solution because it would improve the management, we would have fewer incidents, and we wouldn't need to talk to more than one person for support."

"It does not provide the capability to upload data for blacklisting/whitelisting in bulk."

"The Check Point support language is only in English."

"Check Point DDoS Protector does not provide the ability to upload data for the blacklist/whitelist in bulk, which is one of the big points that need to be improved to facilitate configurations."

"The product is expensive."

"I would like applications for Android and IOS where we can follow the events, and, if necessary, make changes."

More Check Point DDoS Protector cons

"Imperva Web Application Firewall can improve by adding more features to the dashboard. increasing the visibility of the real-time events, besides configuring the administration itself."

"I would like to see improvements in the pooling of threats and attacks, possibly to enlarge the scale of indicators of compromise."

"Pricing can be improved, as it is quite expensive."

"There is nothing specific where the application firewall is falling short."

"If they can bring in generative AI features, that would be useful."

"It would be useful if the solution used more intelligence in attack protection. For example, firewalls are to be dependent on the configuration, but if they could have some data science around it the solution would be even better. The profiling of the traffic, and making decisions surrounding that should be intelligence-based, instead of being based on the configuration of the firewall itself."

"Imperva now offers add-ons to add functionality, but I would like to see these included in the product, even if it would cost more."

"There could be some limitations that from the converged infrastructure perspective: when you want to converge with everything and you want Imperva to get there easily because it's not a cloud component. For example, when you want to build servers and you're using OneView to manage your software-defined networks, implementing Imperva right away is not that simple. But if you're doing just a simple cloud infrastructure with servers in there, you're good to go. Also, we are not able, with Imperva, to block by signatures. Imperva by itself needs to be complemented with another service to do URL filtering."

More Imperva Application Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't deal with the pricing, but it seems that you need to get basic support in order to upgrade the DDoS database for new attacks and so on."

"It's an expensive solution. It's one of the most expensive solutions in the world. It's cheaper than Palo Alto and Cisco but these are expensive solutions. Fortinet is cheaper."

"The appliance comes with a loaded hardware license, and additional options such as SSL can be purchased and enabled."

"For enterprise contracts you will be in touch with a dedicated account manager who will guide you regarding licensing."

"It's an excellent product, but it can be very costly."

"The price of this solution is a little bit high compared to competitors."

"We are satisfied with the pricing."

"There is a license or subscription renewal that our customers pay."

"Varies depending on the needs of the customer."

"Pricing could be more competitive."

"It is expensive."

More Imperva Application Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user68487

Security Expert with 51-200 employees

Nov 6, 2013

CloudFlare vs Incapsula: Web Application Firewall

CloudFlare vs Incapsula: Round 2 Web Application Firewall Comparative Penetration Testing Analysis Report v1.0 Summary This document contains the results of a second comparative penetration test conducted by a team of security specialists at Zero Science Lab against two cloud-based Web…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

35%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Educational Organization

Security Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	83
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point DDoS Protector?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is straightforward with no challenges.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point DDoS Protector?

Check Point DDoS Protector can be improved in that initial fine-tuning of policies can be complex and may require expertise. Additionally, reporting and analytics could be more detailed and customi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point DDoS Protector?

My main use case for Check Point DDoS Protector is to protect our network perimeter against DDoS attacks, ensuring service availability and application layer attack in real time. I can give you a s...

See all answers

Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?

Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.

See all answers

What do you like most about Imperva Incapsula?

We use Imperva DDoS to stop DDoS attacks and reduce the amount of unwanted queries against web services or web scraping.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Imperva DDoS?

The pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Imperva DDoS are reasonable for the amount of technical capabilities provided. I would rate the pricing of Imperva DDoS as five, where one is very cheap a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Radware DDoS vs Check Point DDoS Protector

Compared 29% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs Check Point DDoS Protector

Compared 18% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Check Point DDoS Protector

Compared 18% of the time

Arbor DDoS vs Check Point DDoS Protector

Compared 15% of the time

Cloudflare vs Check Point DDoS Protector

Compared 10% of the time

More Check Point DDoS Protector Competitors

Cloudflare vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Akamai vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Imperva Application Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point DDoS Protector

January 2026

Download Check Point DDoS Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Imperva Application Security Platform

January 2026

Imperva Application Security Platform report

Download Imperva Application Security Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Imperva Bot Management, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Imperva API Security

Overview

Modern DDoS attacks use new techniques to exploit areas that traditional security solutions are not equipped to protect. These attacks can cause serious network downtime to businesses who rely on networks and Web services to operate. DDoS Protector Security Appliances and Cloud DDoS Protection Services block destructive DDoS attacks before they cause damage
Learn more about Ddos Protector.

Check Point Software Technologies

Imperva Application Security Platform delivers comprehensive and continuous web threat protection. Renowned for its ease of use, it shields web applications and databases from various cyber threats while integrating seamlessly with cloud and on-premises environments.

Imperva Application Security Platform protects web environments by offering advanced security measures against threats like DDoS attacks, SQL injections, and cross-site scripting. As a robust web application firewall, it provides extensive monitoring and bot management capabilities. The platform integrates content delivery networks for enhanced performance and scalability, while real-time traffic analysis ensures consistent protection. Despite its strengths, improvements can be made in policy management and customization options. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and more competitive pricing models. The inclusion of AI for enhanced analytics is also anticipated.

What are the key features of Imperva Application Security Platform?

Correlated Attack Validation: Enhances threat assessment by linking related security events.
Threat Radar: Offers visibility into potential and ongoing threats.
Virtual Patching: Provides protection against vulnerabilities without immediate code changes.
IncapRules: Allows creation of custom security policies.
DDoS Protection: Defends against large-scale distributed denial-of-service attacks.
CDN Integration: Improves content delivery speed and reliability.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

User-Friendly Administration: Simplifies setup and ongoing management tasks.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth operation with existing infrastructure.
Comprehensive Threat Protection: Shields digital assets from a wide range of threats.
Hands-On Support: Provides timely and effective customer service assistance.

Imperva Application Security Platform is implemented in industries needing strong database and application protection. Companies use it to enforce geolocation restrictions and manage bots, benefiting sectors like finance and e-commerce where data security and threat monitoring are critical. Its ability to protect and ensure data accessibility makes it integral to business operations prioritizing cyber resilience.

Imperva

Sample Customers

Boston Properties

Hitachi, BNZ, Bitstamp, Moz, InnoGames, BTCChina, Wix, LivePerson, Zillow and more.

Buyer's Guide

Check Point DDoS Protector vs. Imperva Application Security Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Check Point DDoS Protector vs. Imperva Application Security Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point DDoS Protector vs. Imperva Application Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point DDoS Protector vs. Imperva Application Security Platform report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.