Checkmarx One vs Digital.ai Release comparison

Checkmarx and Digital.ai are both solutions in the DevSecOps category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while Digital.ai is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0. Checkmarx holds a 10.9% mindshare in DSO, compared to Digital.ai’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Digital.ai users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

22,245 Views
1,557 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Release

Read 6 Digital.ai Release reviews

1,734 Views
538 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Digital.ai Release

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Checkmarx One and Digital.ai Release are two competing products in the software development industry. Checkmarx One holds an advantage in pricing and support due to its strategic investment in these areas. On the other hand, Digital.ai Release offers comprehensive features, potentially justifying its higher price.

Features: Checkmarx One provides advanced security scanning, comprehensive support for various programming languages, and dynamic testing options. Digital.ai Release specializes in deployment automation, excels in release management, and integrates seamlessly with popular development tools.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could enhance its deployment automation to match Digital.ai's efficiency, improve its integration with external tools, and streamline its complexity for easier use. Digital.ai Release may benefit from reducing its initial setup costs, expanding security capabilities to better match Checkmarx, and offering more flexible pricing plans.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital.ai Release focuses on seamless deployment through integration and automation, supported by responsive customer service aiding implementation. Checkmarx One delivers strong support throughout its deployment, focusing on its security framework with moderate complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One typically has a lower setup cost, offering faster ROI through its security-centric features, crucial for vulnerability reduction. Digital.ai Release, despite higher initial costs, provides robust ROI through effective deployment operations and integrations, representing a strategic long-term investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Digital.ai Release Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Digital.ai Release

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in DevSecOps

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (16th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (1st)

Digital.ai Release

Ranking in DevSecOps

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (15th), Release Automation (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.9%, down from 16.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Digital.ai Release is 4.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	10.9%
Digital.ai Release	4.8%
Other	84.3%

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Jeanne-Mari Chandran

Software Configuration Specialist at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Experience seamless project management and integration with robust tools

The features I find most valuable in Digital.ai Release are the integration with MS Teams, because we have MS Teams channels that publish or push notifications to that. When we start deployments, it sends a notification to the people that we are doing a deployment to their environment. It notifies them when the deployment is started, completed, or if attention is required. I also appreciate the fact that it has plugins for Bamboo and I use lots of Gradle and JSON scripts, and we do SQL upgrades as well, triggering Flyway scripts via Bamboo, along with the integration with XLD and Jira; it's all Atlassian software. Regarding environment management capabilities, Digital.ai Release is mostly useful for me, as it is more application related and that is managed via my XLD dictionary. We have one artifact that is environment agnostic, which has placeholders that correspond to my XLD keys and values, and at deployment time, it substitutes the placeholders with those environment specific values. We don't need to make a specific deployment artifact for dev, test, or production; it is all the same artifact using environment variables, ensuring what we take to production is what was tested.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."

"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis, so it's very handy."

"I have seen a return on investment from Checkmarx One."

"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."

"The value you can get out of the speedy production may be worth the price tag."

"It has made our organization more efficient with our whole code scan/deployment process for our software applications."

"Apart from software scanning, software composition scanning is valuable."

"The solution is always updating to continuously add items that create a level of safety from vulnerabilities, and they are always ahead of the game when it comes to finding any vulnerabilities within the database, so I am assured that when I am scanning my product those vulnerabilities are identified at very initial stages, giving my development team more time to react."

More Checkmarx One pros

"Overall, I would give Digital.ai Release a rating of nine out of ten; there's always room for improvement, but it's really good."

"The time is also reduced because the manual work has tremendously decreased. We just have to click one button, and it will create everything for us."

"Overall, it's been a good experience."

"The orchestration, building the release, and then just executing it and managing that pipeline — the orchestration capabilities are great for that."

"The solution can apply one template across multiple applications."

"Since using Digital.ai Release, time has been saved, money has been saved, and staffing requirements have been reduced."

"The most valuable feature of Digital.ai Release is its ability to communicate with various deployment systems, such as XLD and batch deployments, as well as integrate with tools, such as Flyway and Bamboo. We use Bamboo as our build orchestrator, and Digital.ai Release also integrates with Jira, another Atlassian solution. These capabilities make it a powerful tool for managing workflow, test automation, and other processes."

Cons

"As the solution becomes more complex and feature rich, it takes more time to debug and resolve problems."

"The default module that provides statistics is basic, and you need more elaborate information to do vulnerability management."

"Checkmarx isn't accredited by the US government for DOD networks, so we've been forced to remove it from the network."

"We want to have a holistic view of the portfolio-level dashboard and not just an individual technical project level."

"Its pricing model can be improved. Sometimes, it is a little complex to understand its pricing model."

"For Checkmarx One, I think that adding repositories and scanning impromptu code could improve it."

"The solution's user interface could be improved because it seems outdated."

"We can run only one project at a time."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Digital.ai Release could improve by having a better plugin that works with Guardian that we use for mainframe migrations. If there could be an interface or plugin for Guardian that would be beneficial."

"Overall, the price is just too high; especially considering we're in the middle of a pandemic."

"The backfill could be improved, we could automate that. Right now it's subjective — it's up to the lead developer's memory to remember to backfill."

"Currently, we put artifact details manually. What we could improve, in our case, is the deployment instruction base. Developers input all the information, including which artifact and where it needs to be deployed. What Digital.ai could do is automatically go to the deployment instruction page, take those artifact details, and implement them."

"I would like to improve Digital.ai Release by exploring its cloud capabilities as we are currently in the middle of migrating to the cloud, but I actually have no idea what Digital.ai's cloud capabilities are."

"The solution is a little bit expensive."

"One improvement for Digital.ai Release could be to simplify the user interface for beginners."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."

"The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users."

"The number of users and coverage for languages will have an impact on the cost of the license."

"It's relatively expensive."

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"Overall, the price is just too high; especially considering we're in the middle of a pandemic."

"The solution's license includes all features."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmarx?

One way Checkmarx One could be improved is if it could automatically run scans every month after implementation. If it is possible to set it in the SAST portal to scan the repositories automaticall...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Release ?

Digital.ai Release is affordable in terms of pricing and setup cost. The integration was easy, and the pricing was good, though not ideal for small teams.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Release ?

One improvement for Digital.ai Release could be to simplify the user interface for beginners. New users may take time to understand release pipelines and templates, so more guided onboarding tutori...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Release ?

Digital.ai Release orchestrates and automates the application release pipelines in our organization. When a new application build is ready, Digital.ai Release coordinates the deployment pipeline au...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 37% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Endor Labs vs Digital.ai Release

Compared 8% of the time

Jenkins vs Digital.ai Release

Compared 7% of the time

CloudBees vs Digital.ai Release

Compared 6% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Digital.ai Release

Compared 5% of the time

Plutora vs Digital.ai Release

Compared 5% of the time

More Digital.ai Release Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

May 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Release

May 2026

Download Digital.ai Release product report

Also Known As

No data available

XL Release, XebiaLabs XL Release

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Digital.ai Release enhances deployment pipelines, integrating with tools like GitHub and Jenkins. It enables coordination across development, testing, and production while reducing manual efforts, making it ideal for large projects.

Digital.ai Release is designed to automate and orchestrate application deployments, offering features like email approvals, deployment notifications, and system communication with XLD. It supports integration with tools such as Bamboo, Jira, and MS Teams to create standardized deployment processes. While needing a simpler interface for newcomers, it provides efficient handling of environment-specific configurations and process oversight with metrics and data retention. Challenges include the high cost and complexity, with demands for improved mainframe migration support, automated deployment instructions, differentiated pricing by roles, enhanced cloud capabilities, and additional plugins.

What are the key features of Digital.ai Release?

Orchestration: Streamlines coordination across deployment stages.
Automated Workflows: Reduces manual documentation and efforts.
Pipeline Templates: Ensures standardized deployment processes.
Reliable Rollbacks: Facilitates seamless process reversals.
Tool Integrations: Connects with Jira, Bamboo, and MS Teams.
Deployment Notifications: Communicates updates efficiently with systems like XLD.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Reduced Manual Effort: Automates processes, saving time and resources.
Consistent Deployment: Ensures repeatable, reliable deployment practices.
Process Oversight: Enhances visibility with metrics and data retention.
Efficient Communication: Improves stakeholder engagement through notifications.

Digital.ai Release has found robust implementation in industries managing large-scale deployments, such as software development and IT services. It assists in orchestrating SQL database upgrades, server deployments, and user orchestration while enhancing release documentation and cross-team communication. This makes it valuable for teams requiring integration and logging through tools like Jira in complex projects like artifact installation and continuous delivery environments.

Digital.ai

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

3M, GE, John Deere, Deutsche Telekom, Cable & Wireless, Xerox, and Société Générale, Liberty Mutual, EA, Rabobank

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Digital.ai Release

April 2026

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Digital.ai Release

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Digital.ai Release and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Digital.ai Release report.

See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.