


Chef and SUSE Manager are both valuable tools for IT infrastructure management. SUSE Manager seems to have a slight edge in terms of comprehensive feature sets tailored for enterprise environments.
Features: Chef users value its wide range of automation capabilities, integration with various platforms, and extensive ecosystem. SUSE Manager is praised for its system management, patching capabilities, and compliance features.
Room for Improvement: Chef users note the need for enhancing reporting capabilities, reducing the complexity of initial configurations, and streamlining processes. SUSE Manager users suggest improvements in scalability, interface responsiveness, and performance under heavy workloads.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Chef is appreciated for its clear documentation and community support, making it easier for smaller teams to deploy. SUSE Manager's deployment is smoother in enterprise environments, with strong customer service support. SUSE Manager users find the setup process more straightforward compared to Chef’s complex initial deployment.
Pricing and ROI: Chef users find the tool competitively priced, offering good ROI for smaller to mid-sized companies. SUSE Manager, although perceived as pricier, is viewed as worth the investment due to its extensive feature set and reliability in large-scale deployments. Users feel that Chef provides cost-effective solutions, while SUSE Manager offers higher ROI for extensive enterprise needs.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Microsoft Intune not only saves costs by reducing the number of personnel needed but also offers a comprehensive solution for managing laptops, applications, security, individual access, and enrollment.
With Microsoft Intune, tasks such as device provisioning, policy deployment, application delivery, and compliance enforcement require less manual effort than in more traditional management models.
The return has been far more hours saved than spent.
We have seen significant improvement in the time and the way we make changes to the infrastructure.
I have seen a return on investment with Chef because we definitely need fewer employees to manage infrastructure.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
We usually work with the Chef teams and community support, who are always willing to assist.
Generally, the support is good, but there are instances where the support team seems disinterested in solving complex problems.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
We leverage both to achieve the best option possible for scaling.
Chef's scalability is evident as the public sector organization I work at serves a population of 5 million, and we have had no problems with scaling.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
It appears Microsoft Intune undergoes changes without informing customers.
In my experience, Microsoft Intune is a stable platform as it is a cloud-based service, and updates are regularly delivered by Microsoft.
It is a good tool to work with, offering a strong developer experience and community support.
Chef is stable.
In my experience, Chef is quite stable most of the time.
The stability of SUSE Manager is fine.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
On support, I think there should be more focus on how we can achieve AI automations in answering questions for beginners and addressing deep concerns without general manual management.
To improve Chef, making an interface with another language such as Python or Java that is well understood, as capable as Ruby, and even more widely adopted would demystify it a bit.
The learning curve is steep due to Chef's Ruby-based DSL and the complex components of cookbooks and recipes, which can be challenging for new users, especially those without programming backgrounds.
A better description of the initial setup process could enhance user experience.
Features that can be helpful in disaster recovery.
From an integration perspective, it is difficult to integrate with Jira or any ticketing tool, which is challenging.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
Licensing looks reasonable compared to the manual work of managing whole data centers with even 10,000 servers.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that we sidestepped it by using Cinc because none of the functionality that is exclusive to the paid version was actually in use in the organization.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
Security is a key aspect that Chef can automate, monitor new features that are available, and even do patches without you getting involved.
When you have infrastructure as code and you already have everything apart from the environment-specific config, which you can specify in variables, then it is not only more repeatable and reliable, it is faster.
Using Chef for automating infrastructure and applications in my organization has helped us reduce manual tasks by more than forty percent, thereby saving significant revenue for the client.
It supports more than six or seven Linux flavors, and when compared to other tools such as Satellite, which only supports the Red Hat operating system, SUSE Manager supports Red Hat, Ubuntu, Debian, and some other Linux operating systems for patch management.
SUSE Manager is valuable for managing systems, patching, and utilizing SaltStack connectivity for various installations and other routines.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Intune | 5.4% |
| Chef | 3.5% |
| SUSE Manager | 2.9% |
| Other | 88.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 149 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 60 |
| Large Enterprise | 177 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.
What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.
Chef is a powerful automation tool designed for efficient infrastructure management across varied environments. With its environment-as-code model, Chef provides predictability and reliability in deployments, enhancing security compliance and reducing manual intervention.
Chef focuses on automating deployments and configurations, ensuring server consistency, managing scalable environments, and orchestrating service deployments. Its versatile recipe-writing and Ruby-based flexibility cater to large-scale operational needs. Chef’s integration with services like AWS and Azure enhances its versatility, while its idempotent deployments assure reliability. Despite its prowess, Chef requires improvements in feature offerings, especially regarding container orchestration and cloud technologies.
What are Chef's Key Features?Chef is implemented across industries to automate application deployments, manage CI/CD pipelines, provision infrastructure, and maintain compliance. Its recipes and cookbooks streamline workflows in application deployment, system updates, and orchestration of services, reducing errors and manual intervention in a variety of sectors.
SUSE Manager offers centralized patch deployment, live patching, and embedded monitoring for Linux systems. With support for multiple Linux versions, it automates patch management and compliance, optimizing costs and enhancing system security.
Designed to simplify server management, SUSE Manager features a web-based interface that alerts users to potential vulnerabilities. It integrates with SaltStack and supports DevOps workflows, accommodating multiple Linux distributions like Red Hat, CentOS, SLES, and Ubuntu. While providing automated OS deployment, auditing, and configuration management, it lacks predictive AI and error detection tools. Users often rely on SUSE Manager for tasks within SAP HANA environments, database housekeeping, and integration with OneView and Synergy. Despite its capabilities, users cite a need for improved integration with tools like Jira and enhanced documentation to assist newcomers. It also requires enhancements in its library of VCPs and playbooks.
What are the key features of SUSE Manager?In industries managing diverse IT environments, SUSE Manager ensures efficient patch management and compliance. Healthcare, finance, and tech sectors leverage its automation capabilities for tasks like SAP HANA management and integration with OneView and Synergy. Despite requiring expertise, it provides robust solutions for complex server infrastructures.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.