HashiCorp Terraform and SUSE Manager are both strong contenders in the infrastructure management space. Users express a preference for HashiCorp Terraform's seamless integration capabilities and robust performance, while SUSE Manager is preferred for its comprehensive system management and compliance monitoring.
Features: HashiCorp Terraform users value its cloud-agnostic infrastructure as code (IaC) approach, integration capabilities with multiple cloud providers, and robust performance. SUSE Manager users appreciate its advanced system management features, including full lifecycle management, extensive support for various Linux distributions, and detailed compliance monitoring.
Room for Improvement: HashiCorp Terraform users suggest better documentation, more intuitive configuration management features, and improved customer service responsiveness. SUSE Manager users desire a more streamlined installation process, enhanced scalability for larger environments, and faster updates to support new Linux distributions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HashiCorp Terraform scores high for easy deployment due to its IaC nature but has mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness. SUSE Manager’s deployment is perceived as complex, though users praise its detailed documentation and robust customer service.
Pricing and ROI: HashiCorp Terraform users find the initial setup costs favorable and report a quick ROI due to efficient workflows. SUSE Manager users indicate higher setup costs but justify it with long-term value and feature-rich offerings. The return on investment for both products is positive, with users attributing significant operational efficiencies to them.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Importantly, when someone leaves the company, it helps protect document access on their devices.
Applications are deployed through Intune, and we see fewer tickets for common issues because we can resolve them through the solution.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
I would rate the HashiCorp technical support an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best.
They provide mail IDs, a portal, and contact numbers for assistance.
Generally, the support is good, but there are instances where the support team seems disinterested in solving complex problems.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
Terraform runs when changes occur.
Scalability is effective, and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
Microsoft Intune has been very stable.
A couple of years ago, the performance was not as good as it is now, but there are noticeable backend improvements.
I can choose a stable version and decide whether to upgrade based on its performance.
Stability has been a concern, particularly around backside stability with unexpected terminations.
Once the configuration is set, there are generally no significant stability issues.
The stability of SUSE Manager is fine.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
There are potential improvements in the backend stability of HashiCorp Terraform.
How quickly can it be integrated into my Terraform scripts ensuring rapid availability of resources is crucial.
There is a challenge where our organization is recommending a specific OS, which is currently not supported by HashiCorp Terraform.
A better description of the initial setup process could enhance user experience.
Features that can be helpful in disaster recovery.
From an integration perspective, it is difficult to integrate with Jira or any ticketing tool, which is challenging.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
I use the open-source version of Terraform, so there is no cost for me.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
Terraform modules make it easier to manage complex infrastructure and code within an organization.
Terraform's infrastructure as a code tool facilitates deploying code on tools, and once configured with AWS and local Terraform systems, it can be reused multiple times without much issue.
If changes are needed, I track who did what because my Terraform scripts are version-controlled.
It supports more than six or seven Linux flavors, and when compared to other tools such as Satellite, which only supports the Red Hat operating system, SUSE Manager supports Red Hat, Ubuntu, Debian, and some other Linux operating systems for patch management.
SUSE Manager is valuable for managing systems, patching, and utilizing SaltStack connectivity for various installations and other routines.
Microsoft Intune provides centralized management of mobile devices and applications, ensuring security, compliance, and productivity through integration with Microsoft services like Microsoft 365 and Azure Active Directory.
Organizations use Intune for managing mobile devices and applications, enhancing security and compliance across platforms. With features like single sign-on, conditional access, and zero-touch deployment via Autopilot, it facilitates efficient operations. Intune's scalability, easy enrollment, and capabilities such as remote wipe support diverse device management, offering robust data protection and efficient operation. Despite its features, improvement areas include reporting, compatibility with non-Microsoft devices, and better support for macOS and Linux devices.
What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
In industries such as finance, healthcare, and education, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure secure and compliant device management. Companies leverage its capabilities to deploy security policies and manage both corporate-owned and BYOD environments, facilitating a unified approach to data protection and compliance.
HashiCorp Terraform is a powerful configuration management solution that aims to provide users with the ability to maximize the ease with which users can perform their configuration management operations. It makes it so that organizations can reliably configure and manage their infrastructure. Terraform is a tool that transforms every user into an administrator and project collaborator. Businesses that use it have at their command a solution that they can use for the entire lifecycle of their infrastructure.
HashiCorp Terraform Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy HashiCorp Terraform include:
HashiCorp Terraform Features
Reviews from Real Users
HashiCorp Terraform is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two significant advantages it offers are its ability to help users create deployment pipelines that make the deployment process simple and its ability to recover infrastructure fully should something delete or damage it.
Patryk G., the chief technology officer at Translucent Computing Inc, writes, “Furthermore, Terraform enables the creation of a deployment pipeline using tools, such as Atlantis, which automates the process of scanning and deploying the code. This streamlines the deployment process and adds features, such as auditing, risk management, and security scanning to the deployment process. Terraform provides a more organized and secure way of managing infrastructure, compared to the traditional ad-hoc method.”
Rakib M., the chief technology and strategy officer at the White House, says, “One of the other major features of terraform is its ability to act as a Disaster Recovery tool. Since terraform is an Infrastructure-As-A-Service tool, it can be used as part of the rest of the DR toolset to restore affected infrastructure to its original state without any variation.”
SUSE Manager was designed to help your enterprise DevOps and IT Operations teams reduce complexity and regain control of your IT assets with a single tool to manage Linux systems across a variety of hardware architectures, hypervisors as well as container, IoT and cloud platforms. It automates Linux server and IoT device provisioning, patching and configuration for faster, consistent and repeatable server deployment helping to optimize operations and reduce costs. And with automated monitoring, tracking, auditing and reporting of your systems, VMs, and containers across your development, test and production environments, you can ensure compliance with internal security policies and external regulations.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.