Cisco Catalyst Center vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Management Applications category. Cisco is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while OpenText is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. Cisco holds a 3.8% mindshare in NMA, compared to OpenText’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Cisco Catalyst Center

Read 32 Cisco Catalyst Center reviews

3,535 Views
3,500 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Network Operations...

Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews

2,501 Views
775 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Cisco Catalyst Center

OpenText Network Operations...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Network Operations Management and Cisco Catalyst Center compete in the network management category. OpenText seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while Cisco stands out in advanced functionalities and integration capabilities.

Features: OpenText Network Operations Management offers robust network monitoring, event management, and automation capabilities, focusing on reliability and scalability. Its emphasis is on a traditional management approach. Cisco Catalyst Center provides extensive network visibility and advanced analytics, focusing on integration with Cisco hardware and cutting-edge security features. It stands out with innovative technology integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides a straightforward deployment model with strong, responsive support simplifying the implementation process. Cisco Catalyst Center offers a more complex deployment, offset partly by detailed documentation and training resources, focusing on comprehensive training.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers a competitive pricing model with strong return on investment appealing for organizations with budget constraints. Cisco Catalyst Center has a higher setup cost but justifies this expense with enhanced capabilities and long-term benefits for companies investing in Cisco hardware.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Catalyst Center vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Catalyst Center vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Catalyst Center

Ranking in Network Management Applications

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Network Operations...

Ranking in Network Management Applications

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (58th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Management Applications category, the mindshare of Cisco Catalyst Center is 3.8%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 1.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Management Applications Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Catalyst Center	3.8%
OpenText Network Operations Management	1.8%
Other	94.4%

Network Management Applications

Featured Reviews

AadishBahati

Principal Solution Architect at EchoStor

Unified automation has transformed network operations and simplifies multi‑site management

The learning curve is better with Cisco compared to other products. Everyone has a learning curve because everyone is bringing new technologies, new interfaces, and new ways of doing things. The other products have a steeper learning curve. When comparing Cisco with VMware, I am not comparing Cisco with Arista, Juniper, or HP because those are companies which are doing a very basic level of automation. Cisco is doing way more advanced things. In terms of advanced handling and the advanced orchestration and advanced management plane control that Cisco is delivering, the only competitiveness in advancement is VMware NSX. However, it is really complex. Cisco's platforms are much easier to understand and learn compared to VMware.The only disadvantage with Cisco would be their services and licensing, which is a bit complex and a bit too expensive. Because their services are so expensive, companies end up buying Cisco, but they end up not buying Cisco services to do it. When they turn to external partners, not many people outside know the technology as well as Cisco does. People deploy it, but they do not get the right resources to deploy it.

Read full review

AhmedBahgat

Advisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable

The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The benefits and advantages I see in Cisco Catalyst Center that really stand out to me is its ability to access all devices from here."

"The most valuable feature of Cisco Catalyst Center is automation."

"With Cisco Catalyst Center, it is now controlled in one location and I can easily manage them, ensuring they are all up to date with compliance checks and other requirements."

"Cisco Catalyst Center allows me to manage all the fabric SD Access from one location."

"As a customer, the major use case for Cisco Catalyst Center is that it is easy to configure and troubleshoot, which are definitely the advantages of the product."

"There is a lot of documentation for the platform, which is an advantage."

"Customer service has been excellent."

"The solution primarily focuses on visibility into Cisco products and day zero, day one, and day two operations, enabling plug-and-play features, device onboarding, hierarchy definition, and telemetry data collection to offer a comprehensive 360-degree view with basic automation and visibility assurance at its core."

More Cisco Catalyst Center pros

"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."

"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."

"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."

Cons

"I think Cisco Catalyst Center can be improved overall by making the sandbox setups and documentation more straightforward, as it was a little confusing because the DevNet page documentation, controller URL, and sandbox credentials were separate."

"The only limitation is when integrating with other products due to Cisco's proprietary protocols."

"To improve Cisco Catalyst Center, I think the dashboard and UI experience is inferior to what I used previously with Ubiquiti equipment."

"My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that the hardware is probably a good price, but it feels like the license is always too expensive."

"There should be tighter cohesion between the web-based GUI and the command line configuration."

"If they can add a layer of portable hotspots with some licensing flexibility for 20 to 50 users, it would be a great feature."

"There is room for improvement in introducing auto-heal AI capabilities. In the current setup, incidents are always reactionary, and it would be beneficial if Cisco Catalyst Center could proactively handle issues such as bandwidth crunches and packet drops."

"I must be honest: there is nothing to particularly like about Cisco Catalyst Center. Every vendor can do what Cisco does today."

More Cisco Catalyst Center cons

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure."

"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."

"It may need a more customizable UI."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

22%

Comms Service Provider

17%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	21

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Catalyst Center?

We did not purchase Cisco Catalyst Center through the AWS Marketplace as we used the Cisco DevNet always-on sandbox which gave us temporary access to a hosted Catalyst Center environment for testin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Catalyst Center?

I think Cisco Catalyst Center can be improved overall by making the sandbox setups and documentation more straightforward, as it was a little confusing because the DevNet page documentation, contro...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Catalyst Center?

My main use case for Cisco Catalyst Center in the sandbox is to test APIs and integrate network data into the FloodGaurd project, where I tested device inventory, device health, network health, sit...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The price is reasonable based on the agreement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Cisco Catalyst Center

Compared 20% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Cisco Catalyst Center

Compared 20% of the time

Juniper Mist Wired Assurance vs Cisco Catalyst Center

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds Network Topology Mapper vs Cisco Catalyst Center

Compared 6% of the time

More Cisco Catalyst Center Competitors

Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 9% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 7% of the time

ITRS Geneos vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Catalyst Center

October 2026

Download Cisco Catalyst Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

October 2026

OpenText Network Operations Management report

Download OpenText Network Operations Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Network Operations Management

Overview

Cisco Catalyst Center offers a comprehensive platform for network management, providing scalable solutions and advanced analytics for enterprise-level operations.

Focusing on efficient network management, Cisco Catalyst Center effectively addresses dynamic enterprise environments, ensuring operational scalability and actionable insights through its robust feature set. It emphasizes seamless management with an intuitive interface tailored for professional use, facilitating enhanced network visibility and control among IT professionals and service providers.

What are the standout features of Cisco Catalyst Center?

Automated Provisioning: Simplifies and speeds up network configuration processes by automating repetitive tasks.
Advanced Analytics: Provides real-time insights and trends for network optimization and security enhancements.
Policy-Based Configuration: Ensures consistent network settings adherence with centralized policy management.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Offers in-depth visibility into network performance, facilitating quick identification of issues.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlined operations lead to reduced manual input and increased productivity.
Cost Savings: Automation and analytics reduce operational expenses and enhance ROI.
Enhanced Security: Policy enforcement and monitoring provide robust defense against vulnerabilities.
Scalability: Supports growing network infrastructures and evolving enterprise demands.

Cisco Catalyst Center is widely implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and education due to its ability to handle complex network requirements. It addresses specific needs by offering tailored solutions designed to enhance operational efficiency and security, catering to professionals managing large-scale IT ecosystems.

Cisco

OpenText Network Operations Management offers a comprehensive suite of tools designed for efficient network operations and management. It helps organizations streamline their network processes, ensuring enhanced performance and reliability in complex IT environments.

The platform is robust, providing capabilities that align with industry needs for automation and integration. Its powerful analytics and monitoring features enable IT teams to effectively manage network performance, detect anomalies, and ensure uptime. OpenText Network Operations Management supports scalable IT infrastructures, ensuring reliable operations in both cloud and on-premises settings.

What are the key features of OpenText Network Operations Management?

Scalable Monitoring: Provides continuous visibility into network performance across all environments.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks through automated workflows and alerts.
Incident Management: Enables rapid detection and resolution of network issues.
Analytics: Offers insights through advanced analytics tools to optimize operations.

What benefits or ROI can be expected from OpenText Network Operations Management?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlined processes and automation lead to higher productivity.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and reduces maintenance costs.
Improved Reliability: Enhances network uptime and performance.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.

OpenText Network Operations Management is utilized in sectors like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where reliable network performance is crucial. It supports critical operations by ensuring seamless integration and effective management of network resources in these industries.

OpenText

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Catalyst Center vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

November 2026

Free Report: Cisco Catalyst Center vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Catalyst Center vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Catalyst Center vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.

See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.