Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Ivanti are both solutions in the Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) category. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 20, 2026

Cisco Meraki Systems Manager and Ivanti Avalanche are mobile device management solutions with unique strengths. Cisco stands out for its ease of use and comprehensive management from a cloud-based dashboard, while Ivanti offers cost-effective features, especially for remote access and package deployment.

Features: Cisco Meraki Systems Manager boasts a user-friendly dashboard for easy application and security policy deployment. It supports reliable geofencing, device tracking, and remote wiping. Ivanti Avalanche offers powerful remote control and efficient bulk package deployment, ideal for enterprises requiring frequent remote updates over large device numbers.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki needs to enhance scripting capabilities and third-party integration. Its pricing model is considered expensive, and there is a need for better Linux compatibility. Ivanti Avalanche could refine its pricing structure and upgrade its Android management features, while also enhancing automation and AI capabilities for better device behavior insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki's cloud deployment is scalable, facilitating remote management across dispersed locations, supported by reliable technical assistance. Ivanti Avalanche primarily supports on-premises deployment, catering to organizations with this preference but could benefit from a stronger cloud offering. Cisco's customer service is well-regarded, but some critique the local support, whereas Ivanti provides commendable on-site assistance despite limited remote support.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco is perceived as expensive but offers significant value in terms of reliability and flexibility, supporting a centralized management and support structure. Ivanti Avalanche, more moderately priced, delivers essential features without hidden costs, though it could improve affordability. Both solutions present ROI potential, with Cisco noted for reducing operational downtime through efficient remote management.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Featured Reviews

Anumula Hitesh

Senior Business Development Executive at Digitaltrack

Centralized device management has automated onboarding and improves remote security compliance

One thing I feel Microsoft Intune could improve is troubleshooting visibility. In many cases, when a policy or application deployment fails, the error messages are a bit generic. So, admins still spend time checking logs manually or testing on devices one by one. Compared to the simplicity of deployment, troubleshooting sometimes feels less mature. I also think reporting and real-time monitoring could be stronger. The dashboard gives useful information, but in large environments, many teams still depend on additional tools or scripts for deeper reporting and analytics. If I had to focus on one area first, I would probably choose troubleshooting and reporting. Deployment through Microsoft Intune is generally straightforward, but when something fails, identifying the exact root cause can still take more time than expected. Error messages are sometimes too generic, and admins often have to dig through logs, sync status, or multiple portals to understand what actually happened. I think user experience and policy management could also improve further. Microsoft Intune has become much better over the years, but sometimes the admin portal still feels fragmented because certain configurations open in different sections or redirect to older interfaces. For new admins, especially, it can take time to understand where everything is located. Another thing is policy conflict handling. In larger organizations, multiple device policies, compliance rules, and configuration profiles can overlap. When conflicts happen, the visibility is not always very clear, so admins spend time figuring out which policy actually won or caused the issue.

Read full review

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Has simplified hardware issue identification but needs integrated communication options

We have monitoring capabilities and we are monitoring some network tools from Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and troubleshooting as well. I am currently working with version MR 32.1.4. Policy involves connecting mostly through emails, as we don't have any special kind of policy features. If any alert comes, we connect via mail. We don't utilize the geolocation tracking feature. The unified dashboard helps me simplify device management for my team based on the location, as we have configured devices from many different countries. We give the device's name based on the location, allowing us to identify easily in the dashboard. Regarding operational cost savings, it is cost-saving because in other companies, they use different tools for different networks, such as one for Windows, another for Linux, and a different one for VMware. We use all the systems including Windows, Linux, and networking under Cisco, Centreon, and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), which is very cost-efficient. Regarding pricing and licensing of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), I don't have information about that, as we are from the technical department. Details about subscription and quotation come from another department. I rate this solution 8 out of 10.

Read full review

it_user1399731

Chief Technology Officer at Lane Clark & Peacock LLP

Offers scalability and ability to create granular policies

It is a very easy-to-manage and granular policy-based solution. Policies that you can create per device per user behavior are the most valuable feature In future releases, I would like to see more automation or bringing in AI into to understand device behavior. I have been using it for five…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, Microsoft Intune has helped me manage devices more efficiently while maintaining better security and compliance standards across the organization."

"We have not experienced any bugs or glitches with this solution."

"Intune's integration with Microsoft 365 is exceptional."

"Intune's most valuable features are the device, compliance, and configuration policies."

"Intune helps the organization manage access to its internal apps, data, and resources."

"What I like most about Microsoft Intune is that it's agile and easy to deploy, and it covers the maximum number of policies."

"Microsoft Intune not only saves costs by reducing the number of personnel needed but also offers a comprehensive solution for managing laptops, applications, security, individual access, and enrollment."

"The most valuable features are that users can make screenshots, and devices only need the minimal version of iOS."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"The profile settings are valuable features; it is a good solution, good for daily use, and the UI is easy to learn, and the documentation and YouTube channel help us finish most of our engine work."

"The solution is easy to use. However, AirWatch or Workspace might be more powerful because we've encountered issues, such as manually managing Windows updates."

"The features I've found most valuable are the response time and that you can create multiple systems."

"It's extremely competitive and very good for a product in this sphere."

"It has facilitated zero-touch authorization events for our employees and their devices. Furthermore, Meraki Systems Manager plays a vital role in securing our notebooks."

"The UI is easy to learn."

"They can provide detailed information about your devices, including their validity, license status, etc."

"The web portal provides status reporting and ease of configuration."

More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) pros

"Installing the packages remotely and remote control are the most valuable features. There are around 100 pieces or devices, and the only way to send a package to a device is by connecting to the PC and then manually sending the package. By using Avalanche, we can send a package to all devices with one click. It is very stable and easy to use. Their technical support is also very good. We have implemented this solution for our clients, and they are satisfied with this solution. It does what it is meant to do."

"Ivanti Avalanche has reduced the time needed to perform updates on all the devices across our clients' organizations; it's a great time-saver for the client."

"The most valuable features of the Ivanti Avalanche are the remote control and the file transfer."

"The most useful feature of Avalanche is remote control — especially the ability to remotely install packages to many devices all at once. When the client has, for example, 100 devices needing updates, it would take far too long to update each device individually. But with Avalanche, we just connect to all the devices through the PC and send the updates out with one click."

"The solution is easy to work with. I like its stability and flexibility."

"The terminal remediation feature is valuable."

"It is a very easy-to-manage and granular policy-based solution. Policies that you can create per device per user behavior are the most valuable feature."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the remediation and detection modules, which are currently about eighty percent fully functional."

"Intune's areas for improvement revolve around security and certificate management."

"As for technical support from Microsoft, I would rate it a two."

"Since GMS is unavailable in China, we currently rely on device administrator enrollment for managing Android devices there."

"Historically, Group Policy has simplified the management of various items, such as printer and drive mappings and while Intune offers workarounds, it lacks native support for these functionalities. This is an area I believe needs improvement."

"Improvements can be made by allowing server integrations since it is an area where the product currently has shortcomings."

"I think there should be a better tracking of the cell phones used on the Intune."

"The most important thing is reporting. They should improve their reporting. They should give a free hand to users. In SCCM, I can create my own reports. For example, in SCCM, I can create an inventory report for my PC or for all PCs, but in Intune, we don't have an option to create any report. Microsoft claims that Intune is a successor of SCCM, but SCCM is more powerful than Intune. So, they should develop Intune more and make it equivalent to SCCM. Then, their product will be great in the market."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"In my opinion, the equipment availabilities and competitive pricings could be improved."

"Cisco's authorized scripting can be complicated. For example, we sometimes enter the wrong code using this script, and then we had to dictate to find the problem."

"Meraki is limiting our connections."

"The price of the solution could be reduced."

"One area for improvement in Cisco Meraki Systems Manager is the ability for more advanced users to make detailed and non-standard changes."

"The cost of the solution is a bit high."

"Geofency polices are great, but it depends on how the device has the localization services configured."

"I would like the system's compatibility with Google Chrome to be improved."

More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) cons

"The tool's stability could be better."

"There is a lack of flexibility."

"Its price could be improved. It could be cheaper. I would like to see a better approach for Android and an easy way to send packages and manage devices."

"Its price could be improved. It could be cheaper."

"Because our clients are all very satisfied with Ivanti from their side, there is little I can say about room for improvement. However, I think that to stay competitive with other solutions offering a similiar solution, Ivanti could look into making their products more affordable."

"In future releases, I would like to see more automation or bringing in AI into to understand device behavior."

"The solution can improve by adding a kiosk mode option to the devices."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Intune's pricing is competitive. For example, the license of Blackberry's Enterprise Mobility Suite was costly, but Intune is affordable. It is included as an additional feature when you buy security enhancements for your organization. For example, let's say I have fifty users in my organization and all of them are using Microsoft cloud services, like Teams, Office 365, and OneDrive."

"It is expensive. The cost depends on the license that we choose."

"I would rate the price a four out of ten with ten being the most expensive."

"We have the business premium licenses for the solution."

"I liked the tool's pricing until P2 came into effect. I am unsure about the current value versus the cost of the new licensing model."

"Intune is included in the Microsoft 365 licensing package that we have."

"Its price is fair. It's a normal price. It isn't too expensive or too cheap."

"Generally, we get favorable discounts, so it's not too bad. Obviously, we're looking at decreasing those wherever we can to bring value back to the public purse because it's all charity based. It's all publicly funded."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"The cost of installing this solution can be more expensive depending on who is doing the installation. Cisco is very expensive."

"My clients find it a bit expensive compared to other systems."

"My customers at times have issues with the price of the solution. It is expensive, but overall it is worth it. The licensing model cost is based on how many devices you require."

"It's extremely competitive and very good for a product in this sphere."

"This product is reasonably priced."

"Meraki MDM is the cheapest solution we have used."

"The storage is affordable and the system has some price-related issues. Therefore, keeping the price in mind, I would rate it seven out of ten."

"Cisco Meraki Systems Manager is an expensive solution."

More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) pricing and cost advice

"Although the solution is a bit costly in my opinion, for customers who really need this solution, Ivanti Avalanche is worth it."

"Other than the standard licensing fee, there aren't any additional or hidden costs, although I believe Avalanche could be made more affordable in general."

"You will need to purchase licenses for each device."

"It is expensive. Its price could be cheaper."

"The license is based on assets. I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Construction Company

13%

Healthcare Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	195
Midsize Enterprise	64
Large Enterprise	190

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)?

The pricing sits at a mid-level range, around five or six. There are cheaper and more expensive tools available, but ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)?

An area of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) that could be improved is if we could connect directly with the res...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)?

I work with system management in Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) products. Our usual use cases for Cisco Merak...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 13% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Jamf Pro vs Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)

Compared 9% of the time

Sophos Mobile vs Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)

Compared 7% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft 365 Business vs Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)

Compared 5% of the time

SOTI MobiControl vs Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Competitors

SOTI MobiControl vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Aranda Enterprise Mobility Management vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

October 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)

October 2026

Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) report

Download Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

October 2026

Download Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

Meraki MDM

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) enhances enterprise device management with centralized cloud-based control and robust security. Leveraging intuitive dashboards, it enables seamless deployment and management of applications and devices, supporting diverse environments with efficient scalability and minimal downtime.

Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) delivers a cloud-centric approach to managing enterprise networks by offering simplified device and application management. With strong security features such as geofencing, remote erasure, and secure access, it addresses critical needs in security policy enforcement and network monitoring. The system's analytics and extensive reporting capabilities offer insights that refine performance across device-heavy landscapes. Despite its advanced functionalities, areas for improvement include better scripting capabilities, broader compatibility with operating systems like Linux and Chromebooks, and stronger integration with third-party applications. Although pricing is considered high, the manager provides network visibility and control across devices like iPhones, tablets, and computers.

What are the key features of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager?

Cloud Management: Centralized, user-friendly interface for managing devices and applications.
Robust Security: Features like geofencing and secure access maintain network integrity.
Real-Time Analytics: Offers insights to optimize network performance with detailed reports.
Scalability: Supports seamless updates and handles large environments effectively.
Remote Control: Facilitates quick responses with remote wiping and troubleshooting abilities.

What benefits should users consider in Cisco Meraki evaluations?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlined processes for application deployment and device management.
Network Security: Comprehensive security features protect data and infrastructure.
Improved Insights: Access to detailed analytics improves decision-making.
Ultrafast Deployment: Rapid implementation minimizes downtime in dynamic environments.

Cisco Meraki Systems Manager is widely utilized across industries to manage and secure extensive networks. Educational institutions benefit from its mobile device management to ensure compliance and control over student devices. Retail environments leverage its centralized control to handle diverse endpoints, while healthcare providers count on its robust security capabilities to protect sensitive information and maintain network integrity. The manager's broad applicability ensures tailored management and security solutions for varied industry needs.

Cisco

Ivanti Avalanche is a robust management tool favored by organizations for mobile device and file transfer tasks. Its remote installation capabilities and policy-based management make it a reliable choice for efficient operations.

Ivanti Avalanche supports mobile device management and file transfers, especially in sectors like warehousing and logistics. Its stability and management features offer seamless remote control and package installation across devices, ensuring efficiency in environments such as transport and utilities. While users value its performance and technical support, there is interest in features like kiosk mode and broader Android support.

What are Ivanti Avalanche's most valuable features?

Remote Control: Enables remote management of devices, crucial for troubleshooting.
File Transfer: Facilitates efficient data transfer between devices.
Package Installation: Allows for simultaneous installation on multiple devices.
Policy-Based Management: Simplifies device management through customizable policies.
Granular Policies: Offers detailed control per device and user behavior.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Time Efficiency: Streamlines device management processes.
Stability: Provides consistent performance in dynamic environments.
Technical Support: Ensures guidance for optimal usage.
Cost-Effectiveness: A consideration for improving pricing models and expanding features.

Ivanti Avalanche is utilized in industries like warehousing, logistics, transport, and utilities for managing mobile devices, file transfers, and software updates. It supports technologies such as barcode scanners and thermal printers, assisting integrators in deploying solutions efficiently across client environments.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Hafen Hamburg & Empire Riverside Hotel, Eastview Church, Tourism Holdings, Colegio Sagrada Familia Hijas de Jesús, Tommy Bahama's, Canadian School Mexico, Rosebank College

Goya, Gist, TaylorMade

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Kandji, Ivanti and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.