Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Huawei Wireless compete in the wireless LAN market, with Cisco Meraki offering superior centralized management and analytics, while Huawei emphasizes affordable pricing and robust performance.
Features: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides excellent cloud management with centralized control, making it easy to set up access points and monitor network usage. Its Layer 7 security features enhance network security and visibility. In contrast, Huawei Wireless focuses on delivering high performance and functionality at a lower cost, including Wi-Fi 6 and smart antenna technology.
Room for Improvement:Cisco Meraki could enhance its support services and expand its feature set for greater customization and compatibility. Additionally, better integration and smoother license management are needed. Huawei Wireless could improve its technical support and appeal to the SMB market while addressing setup and stability issues.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki offers versatile deployment options with good customer service, although technical support can be inconsistent. Huawei Wireless, primarily deployed on-premises, is known for straightforward deployment but may benefit from a stronger support infrastructure.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki is seen as a high-value yet expensive option due to its subscription-based licensing, which impacts ROI perceptions. Huawei Wireless is a budget-friendly alternative, offering significant savings and enhancing ROI by avoiding hefty subscription fees.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
