No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
The compared Cisco and Motorola solutions aren't in the same category. Cisco is ranked #5 in Wireless LAN , with an average rating of 8.8, and holds a 10.2% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Motorola users who would recommend it.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Read 123 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews
  • 14,771 Views
  • 13,294 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Wireless LAN Report (Updated: October 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Wireless LAN
October 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 920,336 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
4.7
Number of Reviews
123
Ranking in other categories
Wireless LAN (5th)
Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL]
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2847906 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2847906
Senior Network at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Wireless management has become efficient with rich client visibility for troubleshooting
In terms of specific challenges with hybrid environments, I face no issues. I assess the operational efficiency of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN in my IT environment as pretty efficient for the most part. I would rate it at approximately 80%. I have had some issues with the dashboard itself and as far as switch management goes, but that is not necessarily on the wireless side of things. The wireless side has been quite good. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN optimizes the experience in a hybrid or distributed enterprise setup. My impression of the end-to-end visibility offered by Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is quite good. I function as an admin. What stood out to make me choose Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that I already leverage many products with Cisco. I have Catalyst switching, ACI infrastructure, and use them for my core and edge routers. I would give this review an overall rating of 8 out of 10.
Read full review
it_user375078 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user375078
Senior Network Engineer/Mobility Specialist at CCSI - Contemporary Computer Services, Inc.
Great for hospitals as the main hospital is usually the hub of many smaller buildings and also the tallest building in the neighborhood.
Motorola has solid RF experience for longer than any other vendor These are great for hospitals as the main hospital is usually the hub of many smaller buildings and also the tallest building in the neighborhood. This is an ideal scenario for P2P or PTMP wireless. The documentation is lacking…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It will allow me to integrate another system very quickly, as we continue expanding for our client."
"The product's most beneficial feature impacting network security is the ability to provide centralized security management."
"There are many valuable features of Cisco Meraki, including the switches, stacking, and layer 3 routing."
"The product's cloud controller is easy to use."
"The big draw is the ease of installation. It's easy to manage, and it's easy to implement."
"I would recommend this solution to others because it's reliable, stable, and easy to implement."
"From a security perspective, this product has several advantages."
"We're able to automate as well as manually control as necessary."
More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros
"The reliability has to do with how often an RF link will go down, and this almost never happens in my experience with Motorola outdoor wireless."
 

Cons

"This is just an option that customers can choose from. There's nothing that special about it."
"These units cost between $800 and $900 per device and on top of that, you have to pay yearly fees for maintenance."
"The Meraki platform needs better on-premises management options."
"I have some problems when I want to connect some users when there are a lot of users and they disconnect."
"We have used technical support for some issues but not many times."
"The price of the product could be cheaper."
"The pricing structure could be improved."
"The technical support for Meraki needs improvements made to the waiting times."
More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons
"The documentation is lacking and they need to work on it. Motorola seems to have less documentation than competitors and less of it readily available online."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten."
"Its price is okay for an enterprise. Its licensing is the most painful. If you hear anything bad about Cisco, it's about that. We're supposed to be one of the resellers but had to come back down to become a user. It's really bizarre."
"We do a three-year or five-year license and support. Its price could be better, but overall, we get competitive prices. A lot of times, Cisco puts itself out of range, especially with Meraki. I've dealt with a lot of business development from Cisco, and they have always been accommodating, especially in dealing with hospitals or government. There is also a right time to buy it. July is when they are eager to sell a lot of things because that is the end of their calendar year."
"Since it's been acquired by Cisco, it's an even higher cost."
"As is always the case, the price could be better, although I do not recall exactly how much this comes out to."
"At this price point, I would not mind seeing a four-way channel, instead of a 3x3 or a 4x4, like they do in the Cisco Aironet system with their other brand. For the same price point in this other Cisco brand, it is a lot cheaper, and you can get a slightly better throughput than you can with these."
"The solution is overpriced and more expensive than Hauwei."
"The platform is highly priced."
More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business69
Midsize Enterprise27
Large Enterprise33
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...
See all answers
Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...
See all answers
How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Compared 36% of the time
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Compared 16% of the time
Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Compared 6% of the time
Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Compared 4% of the time
Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Compared 4% of the time
More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] Logo
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL]
Compared 44% of the time
More Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
October 2026
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reportDownload Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report
Buyer's Guide
Wireless WAN
October 2026
Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] reportDownload Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN
No data available
 

Overview

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides cloud-based management for remote configuration and network monitoring. It simplifies deployment and offers centralized control alongside high visibility.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ideal for managing complex networks and infrastructures without on-site controllers. It features an intuitive dashboard for seamless device integration and robust security, ensuring stable connectivity. Users can easily make network adjustments, track real-time analytics, and set multiple access IDs. While effective, areas needing enhancement include detailed logging, improved security features, more competitive licensing, and better integration with other solutions. Advanced user and support features could also see upgrades, and its dashboard functionality may benefit from improvements. Feedback indicates concerns about coverage, device management, and technical support. Customization, scalability, and compatibility limitations are noted compared to some competing solutions.

What are Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's features?
  • Cloud-Based Management: Enables remote network configuration and monitoring.
  • User-Friendly Dashboard: Offers a seamless interface for managing network activities.
  • Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into network performance.
  • Robust Security: Ensures protection against unauthorized access.
  • Scalability: Supports large infrastructures without on-site controllers.
What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?
  • Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without expert requirements.
  • Centralized Control: Streamlines network management across locations.
  • High Visibility: Enhances understanding of network activities.
  • Reliable Connectivity: Ensures constant and stable network access.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses with simplified management and support.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely used across sectors like education, healthcare, retail, and corporate environments to manage client and guest access, secure networks, and integrate IoT devices. Schools, hospitals, offices, and data centers deploy it for its ease of deployment and centralized management. Resellers and integrators utilize it for networking and security solutions to ensure reliable connectivity in diverse environments.

Cisco
Information not available
Motorola
 

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
Western United States County Water Department
Buyer's Guide
Wireless LAN
October 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN. Updated: October 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.