Citrix Gateway and OpenVPN Access Server compete in the enterprise networking solutions category. Citrix Gateway stands out for its ease of use and support, while OpenVPN Access Server is recognized for its feature-rich environment.
Features: Citrix Gateway users highlight its seamless integration with Citrix products, reliable performance, and robust support. OpenVPN Access Server is favored for its extensive configurability, customization options, and flexibility in deployment.
Room for Improvement: Citrix Gateway users point out high pricing, initial setup complexity, and the need for more straightforward configuration. OpenVPN Access Server users call for enhanced scalability, better support documentation, and improvements in detailed setup guides.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix Gateway deployment is straightforward with excellent customer service, though initial configuration might be complex. OpenVPN Access Server's flexible deployment is appreciated, but users find its lack of detailed support documentation challenging.
Pricing and ROI: Citrix Gateway has higher initial costs but offers a positive ROI due to consistent performance and support. OpenVPN Access Server is more affordable, providing a solid ROI based on its features and flexibility.
Citrix Gateway secures our environment from potential threats, which can save substantial financial resources, especially in preventing data breaches or ransomware attacks.
While there are multiple support tiers with priority response times of around 30 minutes, there appears to be a limitation in the number of technical teams who can immediately understand and resolve issues.
It was very good, and I would rate it an eight.
I have not dealt with support or customer service, however, the documentation is good, and I would rate it a seven out of ten.
The solution features high availability, supporting both active-passive and active-active deployments to ensure constant product availability.
I believe that the scalability of Citrix Gateway depends on the project's requirements, as it can vary from simple load balancing to extensive Web Application Firewall implementations.
It's not very easy to expand, and it would be beneficial if the process were simpler.
I would give OpenVPN a six out of ten for scalability, as it's usually a single user or single device.
I find Citrix products to be very stable.
At this time it costs 35% more than other solutions.
There is potential for reducing administrative overhead by applying policies dynamically based on context rather than static rules.
It doesn't matter if it's Windows, Apple, Mac, or Linux - they're all very easy.
OpenVPN could improve in centralized management.
I consider Citrix Gateway to be an expensive solution, generally ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 yearly, depending on the model.
My experience with pricing is excellent as the pricing is free.
The product effectively helps me protect the organization's network from potential threats, thereby securing our environment from hackers and ransomware attacks.
Secure SaaS access is particularly valuable as it ensures that SaaS-based applications are delivered securely.
It's easy to scale and easy to implement.
The most valuable features of OpenVPN are its ease of use, client familiarity, end-user familiarity, operating system integration, and price points.
What I appreciate the most about OpenVPN Access Server is that it's very easy to set up.
Citrix Gateway is a customer-managed solution that can be deployed on premises or on any public cloud, such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform. Citrix Gateway provides users with secure access and single sign-on to all the virtual, SaaS and web applications they need to be productive.
OpenVPN Access Server is a comprehensive VPN solution that enables secure remote access and site-to-site connectivity. It uses the open-source OpenVPN protocol with added encryption and authentication for robust security. The web-based admin interface simplifies setup and centralized management of users, devices, and access controls.
OpenVPN Access Server's ease of setup, comprehensive security features, and professional support make it a viable option for businesses looking to facilitate secure remote access and inter-office connectivity. However, potential users should be mindful of the technical requirements for setup and the possibility of network performance issues in specific scenarios.
Based on over 30 independent peer reviews, OpenVPN garners consistently positive feedback for its stability, security, and free open-source licensing. The most common complaints relate to initial setup complexity and occasional connection drops. Despite these drawbacks, most reviewers highly recommend OpenVPN Access Server due to its robust encryption standards, flexible access options, and scalability across organization sizes.
Versatile Installation and Client Support:
User Authentication and Security:
Flexible Access Control and Tunneling Options:
OpenVPN offers professional support for Access Server, with a global team of experts available through an online ticket system. This ensures that users have timely access to assistance when needed.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
