Citrix Gateway vs Sangfor SSL VPN comparison

Citrix and Sangfor are both solutions in the SSL VPN category. Citrix is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Sangfor is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5. Citrix holds a 11.2% mindshare in SV, compared to Sangfor’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sangfor users who would recommend it.

Citrix Gateway

Read 39 Citrix Gateway reviews

2,138 Views
791 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Sangfor SSL VPN

Read 6 Sangfor SSL VPN reviews

1,025 Views
236 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Citrix Gateway

Sangfor SSL VPN

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Sangfor SSL VPN and Citrix Gateway compete in secure remote access solutions. Citrix Gateway may have the upper hand with its robust feature sets that cater to complex networking needs, while Sangfor SSL VPN remains a budget-friendly and simpler option.

Features: Sangfor SSL VPN offers secure encryption for communications, an intuitive user interface, and efficient integration with other sites using the Sangfor firewall, allowing seamless VPN or VPC connections. Citrix Gateway provides a streamlined experience, scalable configurations for various environments, and advanced security features including MFA and SSL tunneling.

Room for Improvement: Sangfor SSL VPN could enhance its scalability options, offer more customization capabilities, and integrate advanced threat protection features. Citrix Gateway may benefit from simplifying its setup process, reducing configuration complexity, and enhancing its basic user interface to remain competitive in simpler deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sangfor SSL VPN boasts an easy and quick deployment process, great for organizations aiming for rapid setup and supported by comprehensive customer service. Citrix Gateway requires more extensive configuration but is supported by tailored customer service, making it apt for tackling intricate network environments.

Pricing and ROI: Sangfor SSL VPN provides competitive initial setup costs, offering quick ROI with its lower price point and efficient features. Citrix Gateway involves higher upfront costs but offers substantial ROI through extensive functionality and long-term scalability, appealing to enterprises needing feature-rich solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Citrix Gateway vs. Sangfor SSL VPN Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Citrix Gateway vs. Sangfor SSL VPN

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Citrix Gateway

Ranking in SSL VPN

4th

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Universal Access Gateways (1st)

Sangfor SSL VPN

Ranking in SSL VPN

8th

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the SSL VPN category, the mindshare of Citrix Gateway is 11.2%, down from 16.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sangfor SSL VPN is 5.1%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

SSL VPN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Citrix Gateway	11.2%
Sangfor SSL VPN	5.1%
Other	83.7%

SSL VPN

Featured Reviews

Siva Kuppala

Enterprise Architect at Wipro Limited

Strong security and versatile features drive positive experience, but support responsiveness can improve

The main purpose of Citrix Gateway is to enforce the appropriate level of access to the correct user on the proper device under the correct conditions. This is enabled through Citrix Gateway combined with endpoint analysis and optional Citrix analytics for security. Regarding improvements, implementing adaptive access policies on Citrix Gateway could be enhanced, particularly in security posture. Although it enforces real-time contextual access control based on device, user network risk, certain aspects can be improved. Other areas for improvement include BYOD access control and risk-based decision-making. Additionally, there is potential for reducing administrative overhead by applying policies dynamically based on context rather than static rules. Incident response speed is another area that could be enhanced.

Read full review

MuhammadWaqas

IT & Statistical Officer at THQ Hospital Choubara

Easy-to-use platform with an efficient user authentication process

There is an area of improvement related to the configuration of specific numbers required for compatibility with banks in our country. The platform initially had limited numbers available for configuration, which posed a challenge as banks operate on different numbers. To address this, we had to request Sangfor Management to add the required numbers, which they later accommodated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is scalable and can go from a very small deployment to handling 10,000 transactions a second."

"The product enables us to collect logs from the systems."

"The solution is stable."

"The initial setup is simple. Normally with all setups, it's not very complicated. It really depends on the customer."

"Just creating that gateway to the storefront for Citrix is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us."

"Citrix primarily provides secure connectivity. If you need secure remote desktop functionality, it is a viable option."

"It is easy to set up and is stable. It is scalable as well, depending on the model."

"The technical support is very responsive and fast"

More Citrix Gateway pros

"The platform is easy to use."

"Sangfor SSL VPN is a secure and user-friendly solution."

"Sangfor SSL VPN provides secure encryption for communication."

"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of the product is very easy."

"Sangfor SSL VPN has a user-friendly user interface."

"The most valuable feature is our ability to limit access by user, IP address, or MAC address."

Cons

"There could be a faster connection, increased user-friendliness, and more comprehensive dashboards for the platform."

"The load balancing could be improved."

"The initial setup could be made easier."

"It's extremely complicated and it's not intuitive. The solution requires a lot of training to get going on it."

"We have experienced issues relating to multi-factor authentication"

"The initial setup is very complex."

"I consider Citrix Gateway to be an expensive solution, generally ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 yearly, depending on the model."

"It would be nice if they offered easier setups and implementation wizards."

More Citrix Gateway cons

"Sangfor SSL VPN should provide advanced protection against ransomware and better data analysis."

"I think Sangfor can provide a web-based SSL VPN version."

"In redundancy mode, when the firewall goes off, the VPN should be able to connect to the secondary firewall automatically."

"No solution is perfect, so there is room for improvement."

"The technical support team takes around two months to respond to queries. It is very time-consuming."

"The solution's integration with other firewall vendors could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Citrix is quite expensive."

"There are two or three different models, but you can actually have a CapEx where you purchase the unit outright and then there's a yearly maintenance cost on top for years two and three, and four, or you can actually do a subscription purchase through Citrix cloud and you pay on a monthly basis, or you can have a three-year subscription contract as well. I give the solution a six out of ten for its cost."

"It is expensive and requires proper planning with strategy."

"The price could be lower."

"It costs about 4,000 a year."

"I consider Citrix Gateway to be an expensive solution, generally ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 yearly, depending on the model."

"There is a need to make yearly payments for licensing purposes. Also, it is not an expensive one."

"I believe the pricing is comparable to SaaS"

More Citrix Gateway pricing and cost advice

"The product is inexpensive."

"Sangfor SSL VPN is a cheap solution."

"My company has a three-year license for Sangfor SSL VPN."

"The first 30 licenses are free, and you have to purchase the rest if required."

"The pricing is good and the standard license allows for 30 users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SSL VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Gateway?

The price is one aspect, but technically it is complete. Technically, it is really complete.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Citrix Gateway?

It's difficult to say that because Citrix Gateway is changing all the time. It is improving all the time, and I think that it is periodically giving us patches. Anything that I can think to be impr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Citrix Gateway?

I participate in integrator projects over the last year or two. Citrix Gateway is used in both my company and my customer's companies.

See all answers

What do you like most about Sangfor SSL VPN?

The platform is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sangfor SSL VPN?

Sangfor SSL VPN is a cheap solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sangfor SSL VPN?

The solution's integration with other firewall vendors could be improved. Its interoperability matrices and different configurations with other vendor products also need improvements. Our client ha...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenVPN Access Server vs Citrix Gateway

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Citrix Gateway

Compared 10% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Citrix Gateway

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Citrix Gateway

Compared 9% of the time

Ivanti Connect Secure vs Citrix Gateway

Compared 7% of the time

More Citrix Gateway Competitors

OpenVPN Access Server vs Sangfor SSL VPN

Compared 28% of the time

Sangfor EasyConnect vs Sangfor SSL VPN

Compared 14% of the time

SonicWall SMA vs Sangfor SSL VPN

Compared 11% of the time

Hillstone E-Series vs Sangfor SSL VPN

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs Sangfor SSL VPN

Compared 8% of the time

More Sangfor SSL VPN Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Citrix Gateway

January 2026

Download Citrix Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

SSL VPN

January 2026

Download Sangfor SSL VPN product report

Also Known As

Citrix NetScaler Unified Gateway

No data available

Overview

Citrix Gateway is a customer-managed solution that can be deployed on premises or on any public cloud, such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform. Citrix Gateway provides users with secure access and single sign-on to all the virtual, SaaS and web applications they need to be productive.

Citrix

Sangfor SSL VPN provides support for remote user to access the enterprise network from anywhere as long as you are connected to the Internet. Remote access is provided through a Secure Socket Layer (SSL) enabled by a SSL VPN gateway. The SSL VPN gateway allows remote users to establish a secure Virtual Private Network (VPN) tunnel using a web browser. This feature provides a comprehensive solution that allows easy access to a broad range of web resources and web-enabled applications (e.g.: Easy Connect) using native HTTP over SSL (HTTPS) browser support.

Sangfor SSL VPN provides SSL VPN remote-access connectivity from almost any Internet-enabled location using a web browser or a APP that natively support SSL encryption. This feature allows your Company to extend access to its secure enterprise network to any authorized user by providing remote-access connectivity to corporate resources.

Sangfor

Sample Customers

Aeronamic, Avianca, Bechtel Corporation, Betfair UK, Catholic University Leuven (K.U. Leuven), Centene Corporation, Cerner, Charityshare, City of High Point, Clark Builders

Investcorp, Central Bancorp, Griffiths & Armour

Buyer's Guide

Citrix Gateway vs. Sangfor SSL VPN

January 2026

Free Report: Citrix Gateway vs. Sangfor SSL VPN

Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix Gateway vs. Sangfor SSL VPN and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Citrix Gateway vs. Sangfor SSL VPN report.

See our list of best SSL VPN vendors and best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.