No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Claroty Platform vs Palo Alto Industrial OT Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claroty Platform
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (9th), Vulnerability Management (23rd), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (2nd)
Palo Alto Industrial OT Sec...
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category, the mindshare of Claroty Platform is 15.7%, down from 25.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Industrial OT Security is 3.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Operational Technology (OT) Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Claroty Platform15.7%
Palo Alto Industrial OT Security3.2%
Other81.1%
Operational Technology (OT) Security
 

Featured Reviews

AP
Senior Consultant at Payatu
Passive scanning excels and support proves invaluable
Regarding the cons of the Claroty Platform, it is not about the deployment, but rather the identification. The Claroty Platform becomes too noisy when it gives numerous CVEs related to vendor match. Sometimes, these CVEs are not actually related to the device in the firmware at the site. The Claroty Platform identifies effectively but sometimes identifies many CVEs which might not be the actual issue in certain scenarios.
Engineerinfosec67 - PeerSpot reviewer
Presale Engineer at Westcon-Comstor
Comprehensive security features with integral network communication view
Real-time monitoring and proactive threat prevention offered by Palo Alto Industrial OT Security is a key feature of the product, which is distinctive since many other security solutions for industrial plant environments are basically able to detect - not protect. They need to be integrated with other security components, making the deployment more complex as more products and solutions need to be integrated. In Palo Alto, we have a single device that does everything. These features contribute to maintaining oversight over my Industrial networks or my customers' networks, and it's very important. It is a way to detect any change in the field, even if changes are made outside the proper control processes. The capability of Palo Alto Industrial OT Security to map network flows and understand asset interdependencies is especially important in complex environments. In smaller environments, which are the most common in my country, the industrial plants usually change very slowly, so this kind of discovery feature is interesting at the beginning but not critical after the first deployments. The positive impact of Palo Alto Industrial OT Security on my organization brings benefits such as a constant view of the intercommunication and connection between different areas of the networks.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's best feature was the UI and the simplicity it offers."
"The main advantage of Claroty, when compared to its competitors, is integrated secure remote access."
"The platform ensures security without imposing significant delays."
"The solution's asset management is really great compared to Dragos or Nozomi."
"Our different execution team is there to handle it, but overall, the product is pretty easy to deploy and integrate with the existing system."
"The platform ensures security without imposing significant delays, boosts productivity, and allows secure remote access to engineers through advanced methods while providing seamless integration with legacy systems and supporting both passive and active reconnaissance."
"Claroty assigns a score based on how well you are doing in the course. If you skip a video, your score decreases, making it essential to watch the content attentively."
"I have had a very good experience with the Claroty Platform."
"Real-time monitoring and proactive threat prevention offered by Palo Alto Industrial OT Security is a key feature of the product, which is distinctive because many other security solutions for industrial plant environments are basically able to detect but not protect."
 

Cons

"More modularity would be helpful for Claroty Platform to improve its competitiveness."
"I think the only issue is that the hardware Claroty uses is expensive."
"There are a few protocols that Claroty doesn't currently support."
"Claroty Platform could improve the pricing to get more acceptability in the market."
"The product could be improved in terms of user interface design."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
"We face issues in the alert investigation area because it does not properly give the alert communication patterns."
"Occasionally, I face a login problem despite entering the correct password."
"The area for improvement in Palo Alto Industrial OT Security is the coverage of the different types of devices that can be connected, which is a common complaint or request from the end user because everyone has something that is different from the others."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is quite expensive."
"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."
"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.
896,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Government
6%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Claroty Platform?
More modularity would be helpful for Claroty Platform to improve its competitiveness.
What is your primary use case for Claroty Platform?
We are a proposal team and normally use these products for our network security solution proposals. We propose it to our customers, mainly in the Singapore region, as our Singapore affiliate is pri...
What advice do you have for others considering Claroty Platform?
Claroty Platform is quite professional, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Industrial OT Security?
The pricing, setup costs, and licensing allow customers to save and reduce costs. The licensing is based not on the number of protected devices. It's based on the type of firewall that is installed...
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Industrial OT Security?
The area for improvement in Palo Alto Industrial OT Security is the coverage of the different types of devices that can be connected, which is a common complaint or request from the end user as eve...
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Industrial OT Security?
I have worked with Palo Alto Industrial OT Security as a presales engineer. I am the distributor. I have a partnership with Palo Alto, and my customers are System Integrators.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, CyberArk and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security. Updated: May 2026.
896,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.