No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CMW Tracker vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CMW Tracker
Ranking in Process Automation
30th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (27th)
Microsoft System Center Orc...
Ranking in Process Automation
33rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of CMW Tracker is 2.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CMW Tracker2.2%
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator1.3%
Other96.5%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.
Dan Campeanu - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Engineer at ProVision
Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location
The initial setup was quite complex. It required careful preparation of installation steps, as many tasks were not automated as expected. Special attention was needed to prepare groups, users, and permissions at each step to ensure a smooth setup process. Please do so accurately to avoid having to start over. Challenges encountered during deployment included issues with installation and configuration and difficulties detecting machines and executing tasks as expected. Some solutions were found through trial and error during installation, while others were discovered through recommendations from other users. Despite these challenges, the deployment and rollout of Orchestrator took approximately one and a half months to ensure proper functionality.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Comindware is great for workflow management; it's user-friendly and trustworthy, and you don't need technical skills to develop, maintain, and update workflows using the intuitive web-based visual workflow builder."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"Our purchasing team's efficiency and the productivity of our operations team have improved since implementing this solution."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"Overall, this is an excellent workflow management tool."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"Comindware Tracker allows non-technical users to build their own workflows and correct them in the course of work, delivers flexibility, and reduces workflow maintenance cost – there’s no more need to engage IT-department, when a head of department realizes that workflow should be adjusted as soon as possible."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
 

Cons

"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"However, if you have a not so common issue, it might take time to get a final solution."
"It lacks workflow samples, which would make it even easier for non-technical users to build their own apps."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Great value for the money."
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"The price is so reasonable."
"This solution has a very lost cost."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
"We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost."
"I give the cost of the solution a five out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
19%
Outsourcing Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Also Known As

Comindware Tracker
MS System Center Orchestrator
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CMW Tracker vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.