Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cognizant ADPART vs OpenText Silk Central comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cognizant ADPART
Ranking in Test Management Tools
22nd
Ranking in Test Design Automation
1st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Silk Central
Ranking in Test Management Tools
13th
Ranking in Test Design Automation
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
2.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Cognizant ADPART is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Silk Central is 2.4%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Silk Central2.4%
Cognizant ADPART1.5%
Other96.1%
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Cognizant ADPART?
Leave a review
ChrisWilliams1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Test Analyst at Kainga Ora
Reporting efficacy and collaboration improve despite outdated features
I do this for my own benefit, and it has nothing to do with any company views. I work as a permanent employee for a government department. OpenText Silk Central is coming to the end of its support, so we will have to move to something else, but I do not know what the other solution will be. Automation is quite immature at our place. It has only really started, so there is no integration with OpenText Silk Central. I would give it a rating of 7 out of 10; it could be 7.5. It just lacks certain features that would make it a higher grade if it had more modern features.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with OpenText Silk Central?
It can be a bit slow sometimes, and it has not got some of the modern features many of the other competitors have. I am talking about features such as traceability matrix; it is designed more for W...
What is your primary use case for OpenText Silk Central?
I could leave my opinion on some ALM that I have been working with lately. Recently, I have been working with Silk, Azure DevOps, but in the past, I have worked with ALM, QC, and all that kind of s...
What advice do you have for others considering OpenText Silk Central?
I do this for my own benefit, and it has nothing to do with any company views. I work as a permanent employee for a government department. OpenText Silk Central is coming to the end of its support,...
 

Also Known As

ADPART
Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.