OpenText Silk Central vs Zephyr Enterprise comparison

OpenText and SmartBear are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. OpenText is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.0, while SmartBear is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.0. OpenText holds a 2.9% mindshare in TMT, compared to SmartBear’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Central

Read 10 OpenText Silk Central reviews

987 Views
898 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Zephyr Enterprise

Read 9 Zephyr Enterprise reviews

1,590 Views
1,415 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Central

Zephyr Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

OpenText Silk Central and Zephyr Enterprise compete in the test management tools category. Zephyr Enterprise seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability and seamless integration with other testing tools, making it ideal for large-scale deployments.

Features: OpenText Silk Central offers comprehensive test planning, test execution capabilities, and detailed test management and analysis features. Users value its depth and precision. Zephyr Enterprise is known for its agile project management, real-time collaboration capabilities, and adaptability, with seamless integration with popular tools providing a cohesive workflow.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest OpenText Silk Central could benefit from an enhanced reporting feature, more frequent updates, and simplified navigation. Zephyr Enterprise needs an improved learning curve, more intuitive navigation, and enhanced user support to decrease the complexity of its interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Central is praised for its straightforward deployment and strong customer support, making it efficient for teams. Zephyr Enterprise also receives positive feedback for its deployment process but could improve on customer service responsiveness. Both show efficient deployment, though OpenText Silk Central has a slight edge in support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Central is noted for reasonable setup costs, offering value for money. Zephyr Enterprise, despite higher initial investment, offers superior ROI due to extensive features and scalability, suggesting better long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Central vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Central vs. Zephyr Enterprise

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Central

Ranking in Test Management Tools

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

2.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Design Automation (1st)

Zephyr Enterprise

Ranking in Test Management Tools

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Central is 2.9%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zephyr Enterprise is 5.2%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zephyr Enterprise	5.2%
OpenText Silk Central	2.9%
Other	91.9%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

ChrisWilliams1

Senior Test Analyst at Kainga Ora

Reporting efficacy and collaboration improve despite outdated features

I do this for my own benefit, and it has nothing to do with any company views. I work as a permanent employee for a government department. OpenText Silk Central is coming to the end of its support, so we will have to move to something else, but I do not know what the other solution will be. Automation is quite immature at our place. It has only really started, so there is no integration with OpenText Silk Central. I would give it a rating of 7 out of 10; it could be 7.5. It just lacks certain features that would make it a higher grade if it had more modern features.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Integration with tool streamlines test management but needs better exporting options

I use it for test management within Jira This tool boasts an incredibly user-friendly interface that integrates seamlessly with other Jira tools. I particularly appreciate its intuitive features for designing test plans, creating test cases, and executing test cycles. Some areas for improvement,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution adds value because we are able to get the right information at the right time, which helps us to make the right decisions."

"The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."

"If you are an enterprise site that needs a real customizable test and defect management solution, one that is easy to use and with a good level of out-of-the-box functionality and integration options, Silk Central is a good choice."

"It helps us to manage the test cases efficiently, and it also supports integration with Jenkins."

"With the ease of use that Silk Central provides, our teams have a smooth learning curve in test automation."

"The reporting is probably the most valuable feature."

"Issues and Defect Management."

"With SilkCentral, I can have a macro-view of all my tests."

More OpenText Silk Central pros

"We use the solution for test case management."

"It has many features, but the main things that we need are the test cycles and integration with automation because we have automation for the web and mobile applications. We use it for test case management to run the test cases and get the results. At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements. We are able to get the test execution report and the test pass and fail report. This summary is delivered to our management."

"It has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money."

"If anyone is looking for a good, lightweight, flexible and agile test management product, I think they would do very well with Zephyr Enterprise."

"It's very simple to use, which is beneficial, and it has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money."

"It has integration with test automation tools."

"Zephyr Enterprise is a stable solution."

"If anyone is looking for a good, lightweight, flexible and agile test management product, I think they would do very well with Zephyr Enterprise."

More Zephyr Enterprise pros

Cons

"It can be a bit slow sometimes, and it has not got some of the modern features many of the other competitors have."

"At this point, we feel that the customization is bad."

"Adding the test cases and assigning them to particular testers can be improved."

"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."

"Better management of mandatory fields."

"From a test automation perspective, the main feature missing is the ability to schedule executions with only failed tests."

"I have used HPE Quality Center, HPE ALM, JIRA, and Rally. They are much better tools than Silk."

"I think that the portal could be cleaner and faster."

More OpenText Silk Central cons

"We would like support for the agile and behavior-driven development (BDD) approaches."

"The only thing I have missed is an easy way to configure showing the latest execution results of all test cases linked in JIRA (story/epic), thus, receiving the state of a feature."

"We have a lot of automation for our products, and we require a utility for its integration with automation. Currently, we have to write this utility ourselves. It would be great if they can provide such a utility."

"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."

"Creating better default varieties of reporting would make the product much better and more popular."

"We are looking for advanced support with integration to CI tools. This is something which Zephyr does not have today."

"Security needs improvement to protect customer information better."

"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."

More Zephyr Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large."

"DFS is more expensive than Zephyr. DFS is around $32 per person, whereas Zephyr is $10 per person. There is a major difference in the price, which is the main reason why we are trying to shift to Zephyr."

"It costs a couple of thousand dollars for a little more than 125 users, per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with OpenText Silk Central?

It can be a bit slow sometimes, and it has not got some of the modern features many of the other competitors have. I am talking about features such as traceability matrix; it is designed more for W...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OpenText Silk Central?

I could leave my opinion on some ALM that I have been working with lately. Recently, I have been working with Silk, Azure DevOps, but in the past, I have worked with ALM, QC, and all that kind of s...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OpenText Silk Central?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zephyr Enterprise?

Some areas for improvement, include its export capabilities. Exporting test cases, especially those with screenshots or attachments, can be cumbersome, hindering easy sharing and scalability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zephyr Enterprise?

I use it for test management within Jira.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Zephyr Enterprise?

I would recommend it mainly for manual testing and test management. Within Zephyrscale, they also have automated testing, however, I would recommend it only for test management. The overall rating ...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Silk Central

Compared 19% of the time

TestRail vs OpenText Silk Central

Compared 10% of the time

Qualitia Design Studio vs OpenText Silk Central

Compared 9% of the time

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs OpenText Silk Central

Compared 8% of the time

Cognizant ADPART vs OpenText Silk Central

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Silk Central Competitors

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

TestRail vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

More Zephyr Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Central

April 2026

Download OpenText Silk Central product report

Buyer's Guide

Zephyr Enterprise

April 2026

Download Zephyr Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central

SmartBear Zephyr

Overview

OpenText Silk Central streamlines test management processes, catering to a knowledgeable user base seeking efficient, integrated testing environments to enhance software quality.

OpenText Silk Central provides a robust platform for handling complex test management requirements. It improves test execution and management by offering seamless integration with other tools and fostering a collaborative environment for test design, planning, and execution. As an established tool in the software testing industry, OpenText Silk Central effectively supports agile methodologies, allowing teams to manage testing processes continuously and reliably.

What important features does OpenText Silk Central offer?

Test Planning: Facilitates strategic test approach development and scheduling.
Integration: Connects with other tools to unify testing activities.
Collaboration: Encourages teamwork through shared access to test data.
Reports and Analytics: Provides insights with detailed test results and metrics.
Agile Support: Aligns testing processes with agile frameworks for flexible project management.

What benefits should users expect from OpenText Silk Central reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlined testing operations result in enhanced productivity.
Enhanced Collaboration: Unified platform facilitates better team interaction.
Improved Quality: Comprehensive test coverage leads to higher software quality.
Cost Reduction: Optimized processes reduce overall project expenditure.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, implementing OpenText Silk Central helps maintain regulatory compliance through thorough test documentation and audit trails. Its adaptability aids in meeting industry-specific testing standards, providing a reliable framework that ensures the delivery of high-quality software products.

OpenText

Zephyr Enterprise is known for its flexible design, enabling easy linkages and quick updates accessible to everyone. Supporting multiple users, it offers test management solutions for web and mobile testing, integrating smoothly with other Jira tools.

Recognized for its lightweight configuration, Zephyr Enterprise allows for efficient test execution planning and report generation. The interface is intuitive, integrating seamlessly with other Jira tools for effective test plan design and execution. Users, drawn to its automation capabilities, leverage it for both web and mobile testing environments. However, areas such as test case version tracking, report variety, and export processes require improvement. Enhancements in security and test repository management are also noted. Primarily used for diverse test management methodologies, the transition from waterfall to agile frameworks presents challenges, yet integration with automation tools and Jira remains a strong use case.

What are the most important features?

Lightweight Design: Enables easy modifications and accessibility for all users.
Multi-user Support: Facilitates simultaneous user access with a global perspective.
Automation Integration: Essential for both web and mobile testing environments.
Comprehensive Reporting: Generates detailed reports with an emphasis on simplicity.
Jira Integration: Seamless interaction with Jira tools enhances test planning.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Efficient Test Management: Supports agile and waterfall methodologies with ease.
Improved Accessibility: Multiple users can view updates and modifications efficiently.
Cost-effective Integration: Works well with existing automation frameworks, reducing costs.
Streamlined Processes: Simplifies sales and customer verification processes.

In specific industries, Zephyr Enterprise is instrumental for test management in sales and customer verification. While initially tailored for waterfall projects, its adoption in agile frameworks, coupled with Jira and automation tools, supports continuous integration practices. This adaptability makes it a viable option across multiple sectors with cost considerations prompting some to use alternative tools like DFS for specialized projects.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University

Hyundai, Fujitsu, Google, David Jones, Burger King, Ingenico, Websense, Dow Jones, Harris, Saab

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Central vs. Zephyr Enterprise

April 2026

Free Report: OpenText Silk Central vs. Zephyr Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Central vs. Zephyr Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Silk Central vs. Zephyr Enterprise report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.